Someone missed the memo....
Still answering emails as of the end of last week as the Director of DCJIS.. so if he is no longer employed.. he still has access to the system.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Someone missed the memo....
Still answering emails as of the end of last week as the Director of DCJIS.. so if he is no longer employed.. he still has access to the system.
Is the guy running for elected office or is he opening a private law practice representing gun owners?
If he's running for office - his background, his beliefs, his stance on 2A issues matters a LOT to us.
If he's going into private law practice, he IS going to represent his clients to the best of his ability, and in their best interest, or he isn't going to be doing it long. THAT'S what I expect he'll be doing for gun owners - representing them to the best of his ability (and his background gives him some unique ability, I'm sure), assuming their check clears.
It's business. It's not politics, it's business, plain and simple. I don't care if he's Bloomberg's evil twin brother, I can't imagine an attorney throwing a game for his clients. He's positioned to be very effective in this new endeavor, and this new endeavor is business. Not politics, not trying to get elected NES Homecoming King. Just the almighty peso.
And if he IS very effective at it, THAT is what he'll do for the gun owners at large. He'll stack more matters in the win column for us, client by client, and presumably make lots of money doing it.
Or is NES anti-capitalist?
It would NOT be smart for Jason to appear on NES, he would get drummed off the forum with insults just like 99% of the LEOs that used to be members here.
I'm sure he'll do fine in his new endeavor w/o coming here on his knees and being subjected to a beating as he apologizes for doing his prior job.
I wouldn't recommend that he open an account with his real name... but then, very few of os use our names here.
I'd like for him to come on and post a couple of times anonymously, instead of simply lurking like many here have suspected him of doing.
I wouldn't recommend that he open an account with his real name... but then, very few of os use our names here.
I'd like for him to come on and post a couple of times anonymously, instead of simply lurking like many here have suspected him of doing.
He's probably a green member with 5000 posts.
It would NOT be smart for Jason to appear on NES, he would get drummed off the forum with insults just like 99% of the LEOs that used to be members here.
I'm sure he'll do fine in his new endeavor w/o coming here on his knees and being subjected to a beating as he apologizes for doing his prior job.
ETA: If Jason is to be an effective attorney in the courts - if he is to aggressively defend his clients, then surely he must have the balls to join NES and make his opinions known... If he indeed "comes here on his knees" he should indeed be subjected to a beating, as he is a wussy of the highest order...
ETA: If Jason is to be an effective attorney in the courts - if he is to aggressively defend his clients, then surely he must have the balls to join NES and make his opinions known... If he indeed "comes here on his knees" he should indeed be subjected to a beating, as he is a wussy of the highest order...
ETA: If Jason is to be an effective attorney in the courts - if he is to aggressively defend his clients, then surely he must have the balls to join NES and make his opinions known... If he indeed "comes here on his knees" he should indeed be subjected to a beating, as he is a wussy of the highest order...
[SIZE=+2]Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers of the Supreme Judicial Court[/SIZE] [SIZE=+1] 99 High Street Boston, Ma. 02110[/SIZE] [SIZE=+2]Attorney Status Report[/SIZE] |
|
[SIZE=+2] Jason A. Guida [/SIZE][SIZE=+1] Commonwealth of Massachusetts 617-660-4701 MA Dept. CJIS 200 Arlington Street Chelsea MA 02150 Admitted to the bar on 11/28/06 Current status is Active [/SIZE] | [SIZE=+1]Full office addresses listed for Active, IHC, and 304 status attorneys only.[/SIZE] |
This attorney has certified that he or she does not carry malpractice insurance because the attorney is solely employed either as a government lawyer or by an organizational client (such as a corporation). This attorney has no record of public discipline. | Data as of 10/23/12 |
His opinions have shaped how the MGL's are interpreted and enforced. I say that is a good thing. Maybe you don't like the "clarification" but someone had to do it as they are so obscure and poorly written as many of you have bitched about over and over, now someone says "it means this" and because you didn't want it that way, he is evil. Meh.
Who cares about his opinions? He's not marketing his opinions. He's marketing his legal expertise.
Again, he's not running for office, he's going into business. What do his opinions or convictions have the slightest thing to do with it?
LenS making the comparison of NES as the whip to the whipping post for the poor unfortunate members of the law enforcement community is nothing short of ludicrous....
Mark, this is a case where you don't know what you are talking about. I have had numerous LEOs who WERE on NES tell me that the constant anti-cop posts are what drove them away from here. A couple posted publicly about it, while most just silently picked up and left. Most did NOT get into the mud over "bad cop" issues here but some were just "regular Joe's" on the forum while others contributed good info from the LE side. A couple did get into the mud with the haters (who are actually a small minority, but very vocal here). What I will concede (and have witnessed personally when I was a PO) is that POs (in general) have a very thin skin when it comes to criticism of their own (even if deserved) . . . I understand it but don't agree with it personally. [On the other hand, I quit Masscops over a similar issue after seeing a couple of members there continually bash all Deputy Sheriffs, Fed LEOs and Constables (one in particular hated everyone who wasn't MSP) and their Admin just let them get away with it.]
Mark, if you want examples of what I'm referring to here (NES issues), feel free to PM me, but I don't think it right for me to out specific folks (who quit) publicly here.
Capitalism and morality are not the same thing. Freedom does not imply an absence of culpability. Enforcing immoral and unjust law is a moral failing. Whether doing so is the result of a desire to make money, a necessity of following orders, or indifference to the consequences is immaterial to the nature of the act. One can both be observed to be acting in a manner intended to maximize income while at the same time be criticized for the chosen effort. Many here are forcing a false choice, where one can either be in favor of capitalism or opposed to bureaucratic thuggery. I'll take both, and my contempt for bureaucratic thugs is not going to fade the moment they step into the private sector, whether their efforts might serve my purposes or not.
If he's read this thread (which I'm sure he probably has by now), he's most likely having second thoughts and thinking "if getting involved with the firearms community wasn't such a great idea after all... maybe I should have specialized in divorce, alimony and child custody cases? At least there's a lot less anger".
I think Guida will do a good job. It's a good thing for the gun community to have someone come over from the "dark side". DAs often make great defense attorneys. I'm very interested and hopeful that everything goes well.
Good to have you on board, Jason!