TSUSA did not say FU they first complied then under legal consultant decided MA can't do shit at the moment.I'm not upset at all, I'm just sharing my thoughts, for what it's worth.
I'm okay with them moving, I would too, but I think they should continue to make pistols that are Ma compliant. Not every gun buyer in this state is savvy enough to know the work arounds for getting the pistol you want.
I get that it cost money to go through the MA bullshit process to get on the list, but I hate to see more and more companies giving up on us. Call it "cost of business" for goodwill. At the end of the day, most companies just look at the bottom line, but I'd like to see a stronger sense of community from gun companies.
Take Target Sports for example. They flat out said FU Massachusetts. That's what I'm hoping to see more of, not less.
Don't think there's much to do to get around MA law for sales of new guns through our dealers.
With the thinking of "2a over business decisions" we should boycott all MA dealers for folding on the AGs BS , no?
Cudos to Kahr arms the CEO did not like what he had cod options on a carry pistol 18 or so years ago. Designed one he likes and started making them. I want a Kahr just to fill a made MA sub category of my "collecting"