not new guy
NES Member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2009
- Messages
- 36,178
- Likes
- 54,578
New guy, so you'd like to doubly punish the innocent family left behind too? Perhaps you'll feel better when they all go on welfare since they lost a breadwinner and nobody paid out the life insurance policy?? [NOTE: I am not advocating that if someone plans their suicide and then buys mega life insurance that the company pay off, just that if it happened that they bought life insurance a year or two ago and sudden tragedy sends them to this dark end that the family left behind shouldn't be made to suffer a double loss.]
Off hand I can recall 4 people that I've known who committed suicide, I never had a clue . . .
How is it doubly punishing the family? The suicide is one punishment, everything that follows from the proper recording of it are part of that.
Most life insurance policies have a 2 year window where they won't pay out for suicides, so the odds of being in that window are slim. Instead you sound like you're defending a chief arbitrarily lying to the family, committing what amounts to insurance fraud, and furthering the notion that guns are a threat to everyone who comes into contact with them. Does the family deserve the truth? Does the historical record deserve the truth? Would you rather have the gun death numbers reflect one more fatal accident when they should really show a suicide - something that the person could very well have accomplished by other means?