-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
-
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Website every one should visit--IMPORTANT
- Thread starter blindndead
- Start date
One thing that sucks about this app is it doesn't show L2s and the like.
There are a lot of other sick puppies out there that are not accounted for in this database. (I think you can get info on them at the local PD).
-Mike
There are a lot of other sick puppies out there that are not accounted for in this database. (I think you can get info on them at the local PD).
-Mike
blindndead
NES Member
As a junk cousin of mine just got busted on a 2nd offense statutory rape.
But he says he didnt do it.
I think its a good time to give this thread a little bump to the top.
But he says he didnt do it.
I think its a good time to give this thread a little bump to the top.
as does mine.
J
Jose
All those lists could become useful later on
OH MY!
FYI RI has a database of all court cases that are not sealed/expunged. Sometimes has less specific info than the watchdog site but it shows all crimes. Even the former mayor is on there.
http://courtconnect.courts.ri.gov/pls/ri_adult/ck_public_qry_main.cp_main_idx
If this shouldn't be posted here let me know and I will take it down.
http://courtconnect.courts.ri.gov/pls/ri_adult/ck_public_qry_main.cp_main_idx
If this shouldn't be posted here let me know and I will take it down.
Last edited:
In God We Trust
NES Member
Townsend looks good, only a couple of diddlers, Leominster looks good. Then you hit Fitchburg.....man, oh man, what a shithole.
In God We Trust
NES Member
Sec. 53-21. Injury or risk of injury to, or impairing morals of, children. Sale of children. (a) Any person who (1) wilfully or unlawfully causes or permits any child under the age of sixteen years to be placed in such a situation that the life or limb of such child is endangered, the health of such child is likely to be injured or the morals of such child are likely to be impaired, or does any act likely to impair the health or morals of any such child, or (2) has contact with the intimate parts, as defined in section 53a-65, of a child under the age of sixteen years or subjects a child under sixteen years of age to contact with the intimate parts of such person, in a sexual and indecent manner likely to impair the health or morals of such child, or (3) permanently transfers the legal or physical custody of a child under the age of sixteen years to another person for money or other valuable consideration or acquires or receives the legal or physical custody of a child under the age of sixteen years from another person upon payment of money or other valuable consideration to such other person or a third person, except in connection with an adoption proceeding that complies with the provisions of chapter 803, shall be guilty of a class C felony for a violation of subdivision (1) or (3) of this subsection and a class B felony for a violation of subdivision (2) of this subsection, except that, if the violation is of subdivision (2) of this subsection and the victim of the offense is under thirteen years of age, such person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of which five years of the sentence imposed may not be suspended or reduced by the court.
(b) The act of a parent or agent leaving an infant thirty days or younger with a designated employee pursuant to section 17a-58 shall not constitute a violation of this section.
(1949 Rev., S. 8369; P.A. 95-142, S. 1; P.A. 97-147, S. 1; P.A. 00-207, S. 6; P.A. 02-138, S. 4; P.A. 07-143, S. 4.)
History: P.A. 95-142 designated existing provisions as Subdiv. (1) and amended said Subdiv. to make technical changes, added Subdiv. (2) re contact with the intimate parts of a child or subjecting a child to contact with the intimate parts of the actor, in a sexual and indecent manner likely to impair the health or morals of the child, and specified that a person who commits the proscribed acts "shall be guilty of a class C felony" rather than "shall be fined not more than five hundred dollars or imprisoned not more than ten years or both"; P.A. 97-147 added Subdiv. (3) re permanently transferring, or acquiring or receiving, the legal or physical custody of a child for money or other valuable consideration; P.A. 00-207 designated existing provisions as Subsec. (a) and added new Subsec. (b) re exemption for parent or agent leaving an infant with a designated employee pursuant to Sec. 17a-58; P.A. 02-138 amended Subsec. (a) to change the classification of a violation of Subdiv. (2) from a class C to a class B felony; P.A. 07-143 amended Subsec. (a) to add exception that if violation is of Subdiv. (2) and victim is under 13 years of age, person guilty of violation shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of which 5 years of the sentence imposed may not be suspended or reduced by the court, effective July 1, 2007.
GaryO
NES Member
When my son was in Daycare(2006) one of the male teachers got picked up on a kiddie porn charge. The school and police were very forthcoming and did a good job making sure any of our children werent in the photos. I read in the paper the other day that he is being released and guess where he is moving to......... Franklin.![[angry]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/008.gif "Angry [angry]")
Not very happy about someone who was caught with child porn not even doing 5 years but I will make sure everyone I know in town will know about him
Not very happy about someone who was caught with child porn not even doing 5 years but I will make sure everyone I know in town will know about him
Just make sure your victim is an actual perv, and not some guy that got caught pissing behind a dumpster out back of the KMart in 1983.
You think that these people deserve to be walking? Registered is registered. Done deal.
Anyone with kids, a sister, mom, etc...should have no objection to my previous statement. These people are scum man
I know a kid who had to register because he took a piss in a CVS parking lot when he was drunk and they wouldn't let him use the bathroom in the store. Definitely a first-class stupid decision, but he's hardly a pederast.
Wow must be nice to sit on such a high pedestal. I think what Gringo is saying that, as rare as it may be, is that there are some people who are on that list for stuff that is not a sexual crime, such as getting caught taking a leak in a back alley, or an 18yr old kid getting arrested for having sex with his 17yr old gf. Not every registered person raped a kid or got caught jerkin it in their car next to a playground.
It has nothing to do with a pedestal, it's called sack the f*ck up. These people are scum and if you wanna protect them be my guest with the rest of the moonbats in this state. Level III is shown on those lists. Obviously those are a bit different. You're right, not every one of them is....but the ones that are don't deserve to walk.
I don't mean to freak out, just a subject I'm not too keen on
Kill 'em all. Let Bob sort 'em out.
I got caught pissing behind a dumpster out back of KMart in Brockton in 1983. The cop saw the trickle and said, "Hey, you spilled your beer!". I said, "Nah, I was just takin' a leak.". That was the end of the discussion, fortunately for me.
But you go ahead and just kill everyone on the list. Because ... it's the right thing to do.
blindndead
NES Member
Thank You Martlet.
yeah
Last edited:
Could you point me to that profile? Give me a name to search for.
No. I'm not your homework buddy. But there's plenty of registered offenders out there and it took me a minute to find it.
Let's just keep it simple and kill them all.
I figured as much. You won't give me a name because there isn't a single person on that list with only the charge you listed.
The difference between you and I? I don't try to fake my information to seem right. It would lessen my credibility.
