Age Confirmation for Firearms Website

[June4th]

I've noticed that all gun websites have this 'Yes, I'm 18+' button I have to click for a while, and today, I clicked 'No, I'm under 18', and it brought me to the bill sponsored by Rubio:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/2938/text

I know I'm being rhetorical here, but these a-holes really need to just stay the F out than coming up with these useless laws for 'our safety'.

 

[peterk123]

Just wait another year. I think before long all your personal info will be linked to your cell phone number and you will have to enter your number to visit pretty much any website. And of course, you will get a confirmation text so you can't skirt the system.

Price of convenience and an oppressive government.

 

[Roadglide]

I know I'm being rhetorical here, but these a-holes really need to just stay the F out than coming up with these useless laws for 'our safety'.

Good luck with that. I passed a house with a sign on the front lawn that said “Gun laws save lives.” How much more brainwashed can you get

 

[CMEBoston]

Just wait another year. I think before long all your personal info will be linked to your cell phone number and you will have to enter your number to visit pretty much any website. And of course, you will get a confirmation text so you can't skirt the system.

Price of convenience and an oppressive government.

Except there’s nothing convenient about any of it

 

[Dennis in MA]

Section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (21)(C), by striking ``with the principal
objective of livelihood and profit'' and inserting ``to
predominantly earn a profit'';

Wait, what???? I thought Marco Polo was our friend. LOL

It's the 2022 SAFER act. Also hence how the ATF is going to attack us on firearms transfers. Because "for a profit" is a motive and it is vaguely defined by Congress. Is one firearm earning a profit? Seven? Twenty? It's almost like Congress was directed to be as vague as possible.

 

[walter62]

of course it was vague. the law is whatever it needs to be in that moment.

 

[MGnoob]

The bummer is on my green card. It says for collection/investment or something like that.

It’s hardly an investment if it doesn’t outpace the rate of inflation..

The whole confirm your 18th thing is stupid. It’s just like the porn websites which I don’t think even ask anymore.

 

[KMM696]

Wait, what???? I thought Marco Polo was our friend. LOL

It's the 2022 SAFER act. Also hence how the ATF is going to attack us on firearms transfers. Because "for a profit" is a motive and it is vaguely defined by Congress. Is one firearm earning a profit? Seven? Twenty? It's almost like Congress was directed to be as vague as possible.

"We're going to leave this as vague as possible, so when our customers constituents call us to complain we'll blame the ATF for overzealous regulation, tell you we didn't put that in the law so it's not our fault but there's nothing we can do, and tell the anti-gun crowd that we deliberately wrote it that way so the ATF can be overzealous - maximizing our future vote return."
-Congress

 

[Taipan01]

I was told by somebody here but I won't mention the persons name directly but it contains a green, lumpy looking vegetables abbreviated name that the same thing happens on all the porn sites now. Strange.