That it does, my friend.Sucks getting old.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
That it does, my friend.Sucks getting old.
What is the trigger like?
I've read a number of write ups saying it's a great gun but doing a trigger upgrade is recommended.
- I have a sig p365xl with a factory rds and I put an m-carbo trigger spring in and took a pound off the trigger break.
- I also have a kimber mako r7 with a factory ct rds and that has a nice 4.5 lb factory trigger break already. I tend to shoot that one better than the sig, and so carry it more.
How would you compare the 365 Macro trigger to a Glock trigger?The 365 Macro that I shot had a better trigger since you don't have to load up the striker.
How would you compare the 365 Macro trigger to a Glock trigger?
I think most of my bad shooting is caused by my grip, but I think short overtravel helps a lot.
For me I think the big issue is tightening my grip as I pull the trigger, which encourages low left.
The OP can go do his research. I won't post every measurement. The goal is to show him what is out there and give him a rough idea.This is like a chick posting a photo on Instagram. Hides how fat the g26 is (comparably).
It’s about sequence — grip then pull.You can't tighten your grip if it's already at max.
The big dimensional difference is that the canik is almost half again as wide and also just bulkier all around. Even though the length/height is similar, the sc looks comparatively huge side by side.This interests me. Everyone I know that owns one raves about their Canik, especially the trigger.
Almost identical dimensions to the 365 XL
Yes feel much better& I can add the tungsten weightsAnyone laid hands on the Wilson Combat wcp365 yet?
You should consider cleaning that keyboard.Sig 238 all day.
Board chow?You ahould consider cleaning that keyboard.
I think width is the key dimension.The big dimensional difference is that the canik is almost half again as wide and also just bulkier all around. Even though the length/height is similar, the sc looks comparatively huge side by side.
Your 19 has eyes on the back of its head.I think width is the key dimension.
365 macro v M&P9c v G19 iv
View attachment 747009
For me the 9c is uncarriable and unshootable after handling the 365
Too wide, too heavy, grip too short
View attachment 747010
CounterweightsYour 19 has eyes on the back of its head.
Just because?
wish.com switch.Counterweights
you are right!You ahould consider cleaning that keyboard.
Haha this came to me like that, I started a thread here a few years back to figure it out. I think they are for one of those pocket carry clips that will get your balls blown off.Your 19 has eyes on the back of its head.
Just because?
googly eyes it is!Haha this came to me like that, I started a thread here a few years back to figure it out. I think they are for one of those pocket carry clips that will get your balls blown off.
My goal this year is to pass the 25 yard B8 test using a P365x variant, I’ve got some work to do, things are unraveling at 15 yards.I doubt I will be getting into a 25 yard shootout.
At 25 yards, most people can barely hit a target with a full size handgun while standing in a relaxed environment with no one shooting back.