I have mixed feelings about his presentation, although I think we all agree with his sentiment.
I heard him speak at the rally on the state capitol in CT last year right after they passed the gun ban (PA 13-3).
He was pretty effective at whipping up the troops. I like the part about never initiating violence, but meeting violence with violence if necessary.
I think he is less effective at persuading someone who may be neutral because they have chosen to remain ignorant.
He's a bit too "gun nutty" for that role.
Most Americans have never thought about resisting tyranny. If you get right up in their face with it, they get frightened and shut you out.
You can't preach. You have to ask questions and help them get to their own conclusion.
I remember when the OK City bombing happened. My first reaction was "OH my god. he's anti government. he must be anti-American". - I was young. forgive me. I'm not condoning what McVeigh did. Its indefensible. But I'm defending his sentiments. Besides, I've dealt with those people at the OK federal building. They are REALLY nice people. If you are going to blow up a federal building, do it in NY or NJ. I mean comeon. You blew up the FAA aircraft registry. What could you possibly have against them? But I digress.
So there you go. The pro-gun cops silently chuckled when they read his email. The moderate cops, chuckled, then ran his name to see if the guy had any warrants. The anti-cops probably already knew who he was and it didn't change anything.