joeendris
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2011
- Messages
- 4,144
- Likes
- 789
He's terrible, but was worth supporting at the time. Now, I wouldn't walk across the street to vote for the guy.
Brown or Warren. Which dingbat, er...moonbat, do you want?
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
He's terrible, but was worth supporting at the time. Now, I wouldn't walk across the street to vote for the guy.
Brown or Warren. Which dingbat, er...moonbat, do you want?
Got an AID told him he lost my vote, my family's vote, my gun clubs vote and probably all the gun owners in Mass. Im voting third party or a bullet. I wouldnt vote for either now. Now the AID was flustered and said their phones have been ringing off the hook. So here we go Call and Email as much as possible and see what he does.
Its kinda fun blasting his office! (202) 224-4543
I disagree only with your last line. I think that more people have left this state for financial reasons than for gun law reasons. Here, inside the echo chamber, it's easy to think that guns are the biggest issue around. While it's a big issue for US, it's not a big issue for most other people. Outside of NES, I only know of a few people who had guns and gun laws enter into their calculus when deciding to move out of state. One moved because of taxes, housing prices, other cost of living factors, and finally guns. I don't know that he's bought one gun since moving the New Hampshire. The additional commuting costs are more than offset by other savings he realizes up there.
If I were able to move I would, and guns would certainly be a factor. Other stupid laws in this state, a stupid tax structure, value for my housing dollar, and other factors would be larger factors.
I think if you ask around, you'll find that a lot of people left for non gun reasons.
isn't that what the courts are for?
Brown or Warren. Which dingbat, er...moonbat, do you want?
I disagree only with your last line. I think that more people have left this state for financial reasons than for gun law reasons. Here, inside the echo chamber, it's easy to think that guns are the biggest issue around. While it's a big issue for US, it's not a big issue for most other people. Outside of NES, I only know of a few people who had guns and gun laws enter into their calculus when deciding to move out of state. One moved because of taxes, housing prices, other cost of living factors, and finally guns. I don't know that he's bought one gun since moving the New Hampshire. The additional commuting costs are more than offset by other savings he realizes up there.
If I were able to move I would, and guns would certainly be a factor. Other stupid laws in this state, a stupid tax structure, value for my housing dollar, and other factors would be larger factors.
I think if you ask around, you'll find that a lot of people left for non gun reasons.
I don't think there will be a big difference, unfortunately.
Worse then Ted or just as bad? I have no doubts she is the polar opposite of what I believe yet I'll still vote for her. Rinos need to be tossed no matter how distasteful the alternative is.You obviously don't know much about Elizabeth Warren.
No, I will never buy in the PRM, nor will I ever give up my guns. I plan on leaving this cesspool within a year. If that includes me leaving my job, so be it. This state is a cancer.People will give up their guns, because their houses are under water. Yet people here still buy homes in MA...
Worse then Ted or just as bad? I have no doubts she is the polar opposite of what I believe yet I'll still vote for her. Rinos need to be tossed no matter how distasteful the alternative is.
Partial victories need to be taken when they're available. Remember all those years with entrenched Ted? How many times might someone else voted differently on a critical issue?
If we all do this, why should Scott Brown (or anyone else) do anything but pay the most minimal lip service to conservatism?
I want to preface this by saying I'm not trying to start an argument, because I know this is a touchy subject. I'm looking for information, not a flame war.
Anybody have info on what state has the most lax concealed carry requirements? I'm all for a person's right to protection, but there are some people who probably shouldn't be allowed to carry (I'm thinking ex convicts, people with severe psychological issues, etc). Perhaps in some states they can get a license easily, thus leading states like MA to feel the need to "protect" themselves from states with particularly lax requirements. I don't really know the facts, which is why I'm asking.
Maybe the better way to go about this would be to have a country-wide CCW license, so there's no issue with one state being more lax than another?
You obviously don't know much about Elizabeth Warren.
His facebook page is priceless, you get to put a name to the face for all the anti gun moonbats you hear about
https://www.facebook.com/senatorscottbrown?sk=wall&filter=12
Thank you for standing up for MA. I’m glad you sided with our mayors and cops when it came to deciding who can carry concealed and loaded guns in MA.
So more of the citizen's money being spent to uphold a right that the govt. is not supposed to infringe upon and in the mean time some of those citizens will be sitting in a jail cell till their case is heard?isn't that what the courts are for?
His facebook page is priceless, you get to put a name to the face for all the anti gun moonbats you hear about
https://www.facebook.com/senatorscottbrown?sk=wall&filter=12
You guys that would vote for Warren over Brown in the election are just morons and/or gluttons for continued Nanny-state beat-downs. She would vote the opposite way of your ideals EVERY single time.
-JR
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk
Putting the merits of the bill aside, you guys that would vote for Warren over Brown in the election are just morons and/or gluttons for continued Nanny-state beat-downs. She would vote the opposite way of your ideals EVERY single time.
-JR
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk
This.HR 822 is totally irrelevant in any case. Even if by some miracle the bill passed both houses, the President won't sign it.
So more of the citizen's money being spent to uphold a right that the govt. is not supposed to infringe upon and in the mean time some of those citizens will be sitting in a jail cell till their case is heard?