So that's what I'm asking: for legal purposes - what is considered to be your "house" (maybe that's not the correct legal term - but "house" is the word being used in this thread).
Say I have three buildings on my property - and one of them is my "house" (the building with bedrooms in it) , one is a 2 car garage - and one is a barn. All of them are physically disconnected from each other.
I would imagine that the actual "house" (again - the one with the bedrooms in it , I.E. , the building we actually live in) - would always be safely considered to be safe from warrantless searches - because I can't think of any instance I have ever heard of where the actual building you live in (again - the "house") - could be considered to be anything else but a "house".
But what about the barn - and the garage?
Again - this is a theoretical question - but if I'm out in the yard - I see the black Suburbans coming into the driveway - but they don't see me - which building should I go for? Do I HAVE TO BE in the "house" to be considered safe from a warrantless search - or is any building on the property on equal legal terms with the "house" ??
I know you said " In this context, your house would be whereever a warrant would be required for police entry. " - but I'm not sure what buildings would be considered to be "whereever a warrant would be required for police entry".
Obviously the police don't require a warrant to simply step onto my property - or I would not have to worry about sticking my head out the door - or stepping out the door onto my front stoop.
Where is the dividing line?
What about underground bunkers? (kidding - sort of
)