Whiskeywon
NES Member
For heaven's sake can somebody stop this madness. I understand the point that some people want the security in knowing their firearm is some resemblance of legal (yes, I know edict not actual law). But there have been a few times now that I have seen where people are labeling firearms that the assault weapons ban have no forbearance beyond being feature compliant with the law. As in not a named firearm. So why some people are labeling things like a PTR rifle, SKS or Scar (I've seen all three now) as pre-healey and attempting to charge a premium is beginning to melt my brain more than already dealing with a world where a "pre-healey" named ban firearm is a thing. Not really a rant, just curious are there gun owning residents of Massachusetts that believe all semi-autos were defacto banned by Healey reinterpretation of the named firearm component of the AWB.