Harry Christopher
NES Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2023
- Messages
- 385
- Likes
- 1,517
Federal punch is making a compelling case for 22 being for sd
There appears to be an opinion.......... in the .22 is useful for self-defense community......... that if this caliber is chosen for that usage, one would be well advised to consider the round's penetration capability as well as its functionality capabilities as the pre-eminent considerations factors when it may be used against human targets.
The CCI Mini-Mag has so far built an excellent track record for reliable functioning especially for users of semi-autos such as the Ruger Mark 4 series. In the SW 63 the functionality is a bit more forgiving due to the very nature of the revolver genre itself.
I have not had an opportunity to try the new Punch in our 63s or Mark 4s, so I have no first had experience with how it works in the real world in guns that we own.
A very real consideration that bares thinking about is just how loud a full-size caliber......such as the .357 Mag that is our house gun......would sound in the confines of a normal size home pursuant to loss of hearing for both people and animals in the house at the time of discharge. Losing your ability to hear what is going on around you during a "repel boarders" situation inside the structure would not necessarily be helpful in that set of circumstances.
As you know the Republic is one of 8 that do not permit citizen ownership of suppressors. In an interior situation the use of a suppressor equipped handgun would I think be a very real positive relative to maintaining the hearing ability of all on the premises at the time of the incident.
Despite my best efforts.......I was unable to find in the original 4420 proposal any mention of correcting the suppressor ban any time soon.........which I suspect is just an "oversight" on the part of the bill's authors..........
Last edited: