fencer
NES Member
No - CSX is short for "compact sux"Why did they name it after a railroad?
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
No - CSX is short for "compact sux"Why did they name it after a railroad?
Ugly, short, black with a big butt?Looks like a girl I knew. Yuck.
Yes. You are the only one.Am I the only one who was hoping for a 9mm moon-clipped Single Action wheelgun...???
View attachment 558160
Good point. This silly railroad gun thang certainly isn't the gun for me, but neither was the "EZ" and they're selling them like hotcakes.They’re trying to blend 1911 trigger with benefits of a polymer frame. I personally have zero interest. However S&W has sold a shit ton of EZ whatever and shields so this might get them an extra sale to all the pistol noobs from 2020.
The Hudson H9 did it better even if it had that stupid brick of a jawline. I swear the Hudson design with a CZ style frame over slide would kick ass.They’re trying to blend 1911 trigger with benefits of a polymer frame. I personally have zero interest. However S&W has sold a shit ton of EZ whatever and shields so this might get them an extra sale to all the pistol noobs from 2020.
S&W did apply for the CSX trademark for firearms, so it's real.photoshopped fake?
The Hudson H9 did it better even if it had that stupid brick of a jawline. ...
So should they change the name of the Shield to the Guilford?
The ConRail series of concealed carry guns.. only the Shields never had accessory rails.So should they change the name of the Shield to the Guilford?
Yeah, too many WTFs to make sense.photoshopped fake?
Why single action?
I know why ... because SW s*cks balls.
Bunch of p*ssies at SW. When are they going to come up with a new cartridge bigger than their 500? ... Or maybe a 454.
It has been almost 20 years since the 500 was introduced, and it is not even the biggest, the 500 Linebaugh is.
Instead they create some POS single action compact gun for a saturated market that didnt ask for a single action. This sh*t will only sell because SW will flood dealers with it, there will be 20 in every store and a bunch of noobs will buy it.
If it’s real, and it has a hammer, the trigger should be decent!Why single action?
I know why ... because SW s*cks balls.
Bunch of p*ssies at SW. When are they going to come up with a new cartridge bigger than their 500? ... Or maybe a 454.
It has been almost 20 years since the 500 was introduced, and it is not even the biggest, the 500 Linebaugh is.
Instead they create some POS single action compact gun for a saturated market that didnt ask for a single action. This sh*t will only sell because SW will flood dealers with it, there will be 20 in every store and a bunch of noobs will buy it.
99% of striker pistols are, I know not ‘technically’ but in essence ‘single action’ as in no restrike (I know there is/are strikers with second strike but it’s not the norm), have to rack slide to make it ready to fire.Why single action?
I know why ... because SW s*cks balls.
Bunch of p*ssies at SW. When are they going to come up with a new cartridge bigger than their 500? ... Or maybe a 454.
It has been almost 20 years since the 500 was introduced, and it is not even the biggest, the 500 Linebaugh is.
Instead they create some POS single action compact gun for a saturated market that didnt ask for a single action. This sh*t will only sell because SW will flood dealers with it, there will be 20 in every store and a bunch of noobs will buy it.
That's fine on a striker. But this POS has a hammer. Another thing that can get caught on sh*t.99% of striker pistols are, I know not ‘technically’ but in essence ‘single action’ as in no restrike (I know there is/are strikers with second strike but it’s not the norm), have to rack slide to make it ready to fire.
Well maybe people shouldn’t be wearing shirts.....or shitsThat's fine on a striker. But this POS has a hammer. Another thing that can get caught on sh*t.
Doesn’t per se make a glock single action. Hell the striker is only even partially cocked at rest. Other striker guns, differ, though.99% of striker pistols are, I know not ‘technically’ but in essence ‘single action’ as in no restrike (I know there is/are strikers with second strike but it’s not the norm), have to rack slide to make it ready to fire.
I know they’re not technically single action, but with the exception of a safety and/or decocker, other than trigger pull, what’s the difference? Pull trigger, no bang, empty chamber or not, the firing pin doesn’t fall again until after the slide is racked again.Doesn’t per se make a glock single action. Hell the striker is only even partially cocked at rest. Other striker guns, differ, though.
On a single action gun lowering/decocking the hammer/striker requires manually cocking the hammer/striker again without being able to pull the trigger longer/harder to actuate two actions (cock & fire) the gun in a single pull of the trigger (double action). Single action guns have much shorter and finer triggers which theoretically gives them better accuracy from the activation of the trigger resulting in less likelihood of yawing/pitching of the firearm at the expense of safety due to ease of activating the trigger inadvertently.I know they’re not technically single action, but with the exception of a safety and/or decocker, other than trigger pull, what’s the difference? Pull trigger, no bang, empty chamber or not, the firing pin doesn’t fall again until after the slide is racked again.
You didn’t hear what I was sayingOn a single action gun lowering/decocking the hammer/striker requires manually cocking the hammer/striker again without being able to pull the trigger longer/harder to actuate two actions (cock & fire) the gun in a single pull of the trigger (double action). Single action guns have much shorter and finer triggers which theoretically gives them better accuracy from the activation of the trigger resulting in less likelihood of yawing/pitching of the firearm at the expense of safety due to ease of activating the trigger inadvertently.
He said "other than trigger pull" what's the difference. Then you proceeded to tell him all about trigger pull.On a single action gun lowering/decocking the hammer/striker requires manually cocking the hammer/striker again without being able to pull the trigger longer/harder to actuate two actions (cock & fire) the gun in a single pull of the trigger (double action). Single action guns have much shorter and finer triggers which theoretically gives them better accuracy from the activation of the trigger resulting in less likelihood of yawing/pitching of the firearm at the expense of safety due to ease of activating the trigger inadvertently.
He missed where you said "other than trigger pull" apparently. Reading comprehension......its not his thing.You didn’t hear what I was saying
I’d die from laughter.It's going to be funny if CSX has their identity trademarked and S&W's lawyers f***ed up their due diligence.