1. If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

  2. Dismiss Notice

Hopkinton chief pulls 3 officers' LTCs

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by JJ4, Apr 2, 2019.

  1. Bob P

    Bob P NES Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2008
    Messages:
    11,001
    Likes Received:
    2,657
    Location:
    Texas
    $100 this was retaliation for their milking a comp claim.
     
    Palladin, drgrant and M1911 like this.

  2. falcon123

    falcon123 NES Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2013
    Messages:
    5,849
    Likes Received:
    1,590
    Location:
    Central Mass
    Have you been following the State police overtime scandal? They got a slap on the wrist and a couple of them even got their jobs back due to some bullshit union excuse.
     
  3. falcon123

    falcon123 NES Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2013
    Messages:
    5,849
    Likes Received:
    1,590
    Location:
    Central Mass
    Wasn't there a locaql cop that went to prison for doing that recently?
     
  4. Asaltweapon

    Asaltweapon NES Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2008
    Messages:
    11,492
    Likes Received:
    4,283
    Location:
    Northern Mass
    The overtime must have been killing his budget making him look bad.
     
    Bob P likes this.
  5. AntiHippie

    AntiHippie

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2010
    Messages:
    4,924
    Likes Received:
    1,346
    So someone who is not a mental health professional should be able to decide someone’s PTSD diagnosis warrants invalidating their Constitutional rights? Just, f*** America, hand it all over to the government who knows better than us how to dispense small doses of liberty at their discretion?

    Go back to Bernie, Communist scum.
     
    CoastieRon likes this.
  6. Talon3

    Talon3 NES Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2006
    Messages:
    442
    Likes Received:
    81
    Location:
    Inside the State
    the chief was hired from NJ should explain a lot.
    First outside chief in over 50 years.
     
  7. millbilly

    millbilly NES Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    843
    Likes Received:
    500
    Location:
    Marstons Mills
    A doctor's note is NOT the end all be all.
     
  8. AHM

    AHM NES Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2013
    Messages:
    5,343
    Likes Received:
    2,661
    People who actually play stupid games(*)
    don't get to pick their stupid prizes.

    Was it the best approach when the IRS went after (Al) Capone?

    (*) I have no idea what the real story is with the Hopkinton Three.
    But were multiple laws to be at issue,
    there isn't necessarily a strict pecking order of which gets focus first.
     
  9. JJ4

    JJ4 NES Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2013
    Messages:
    2,750
    Likes Received:
    1,142
    Location:
    South Central MA
  10. TayNinh_66

    TayNinh_66

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    1,128
    Likes Received:
    329
    Location:
    East Boston
  11. Reptile

    Reptile NES Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,276
    Likes Received:
    3,501
    "The cause of the officers’ injuries, which occurred on July 24, 2017, is not being released."

    I don't know what these officers saw or did but it must have been horrific if all three are claiming PTSD and can no longer work.

    Attorney Kathleen Reagan specializes in Second Amendment issues. Also a leading expert on horses if anyone is interested.

    Kathleen Reagan, Esq. – Biography

    The bar should be pretty high to have a person to lose their LTC if they have never been committed.
     
  12. AHM

    AHM NES Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2013
    Messages:
    5,343
    Likes Received:
    2,661
    Don't forget,

    In a breakfast of bacon and eggs,
    the chicken is involved -
    but the pig is committed.​

    (Uncommonly, no subtext intended in this instance of the above quote)
     
    whalerman69, Choctaw and Reptile like this.
  13. Bonesinium

    Bonesinium NES Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    14,247
    Likes Received:
    6,704
    Location:
    Southern NH
    This whole thing is utterly ironic. If police didn't have this sort of discretion to issue and revoke LTC's, this wouldn't be an issue. But police want that discretion. And now that it's police themselves being adversely effected by this police discretion it's now a problem. Well, that's a shame.
     
    KVX and 42! like this.
  14. drgrant

    drgrant Moderator NES Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Messages:
    66,000
    Likes Received:
    21,940
    A friend of mine had some issues recently and a minor criminal case took almost a year to resolve because of it, looking back I am thinking the opposition's attorney kept trying to stall everything to try to get my friend to roll, too bad his attorney was another friend of ours, so that "make the target broke" thing didn't work.
     
    AHM likes this.
  15. AHM

    AHM NES Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2013
    Messages:
    5,343
    Likes Received:
    2,661
    Uh, would that be "a district attorney"?
    Or was someone (illegally?) reenacting a Rumpole episode here?
     
  16. drgrant

    drgrant Moderator NES Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Messages:
    66,000
    Likes Received:
    21,940
    In this case we should be specific, police chiefs want the discretion because of a bunch of tyrants on MCOPA. Rank and file cops on average probably don't give two shits about the licensing system one way or the other. A good third or more of the police chiefs in MA were never even real cops, just desk jockeys with a CJ degree and a bunch of fancy sounding public-health-policy like bullshit on their resume. A lot of the blow-ins in this state are disgusting. And those guys probably run MCOPA like a cabal of clem suspenders fudds ruining the local gun club. Same mentality/BS.

    Well the ADA played games, but the broad bringing the accusation against him had her own attorney too, and those two basically were doing some kind of a circle jerk to try to
    screw him by dragging it out. It was totally absurd. Judge must have continued it like 9000 times. "Oh this person isn't here, oh well, continued" blah blah, etc. What a
    farce.

    -Mike
     
    Boston4567, cams, JJ4 and 2 others like this.
  17. AHM

    AHM NES Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2013
    Messages:
    5,343
    Likes Received:
    2,661
    (Just like a house buyer can theoretically
    hire a buyer's real estate agent,
    but precious few people ever do),
    I can imagine a criminal complainant bringing
    a lawyer into a case to look out for their interests
    (and "advise" the DA; they must love that).

    I wonder if that's rare enough that
    it's nature's way of telling the defendant
    that they're really getting scrod.
     
  18. drgrant

    drgrant Moderator NES Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Messages:
    66,000
    Likes Received:
    21,940
    I think the broads attorney was an ambulance chaser and he was only there because he thought even a minor win for her would have set up a civil case for him.

    -Mike
     
    AHM likes this.
  19. SERE

    SERE NES Life Member NES Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2010
    Messages:
    4,885
    Likes Received:
    3,145
    Location:
    North of Boston
    I haven't found anything from yesterday, yet.

    Did find this. No idea about who he or his channel are:

     
    AHM likes this.
  20. MisterHappy

    MisterHappy NES Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    19,929
    Likes Received:
    4,622
    Location:
    On the 16 yard line, shootin' for the Lewis!
    MsHappy was part of a criminal complaint years ago, when a guy pulled her, and three other ladies over, while impersonating a Police Officer.

    At about the third continuance due to the defendant's council's request, the DA complained to the Judge, as three or 4 (depending on which time it was) prosecution witnesses had to take time off.

    "What do they do?" said the Judge.

    DA:"Engineer. Engineer. Nurse. Probation Officer."

    Judge: "We got to trial. Now." [laugh]
     
    amm5061, drgrant and AHM like this.
  21. 42!

    42! NES Life Member NES Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2010
    Messages:
    5,543
    Likes Received:
    2,684
    The problem with this whole discussion is we don't have all the information, and we never will. There are medical reports that the Chief has seen (this was mentioned previously), and depending on what they say the Chief is either protecting the public or persecuting the officers.

    One of the participants in the video SERE posted even mentioned that this determination should be based on an evaluation, none of the participants seen to know that those evaluation did exist, but of course we, and they, will never see them because of the private nature of the information, and rightly so.

    So it ends up in court, and the judge will see the reports and hear the Chief's reasoning, and make a decision.

    I think the courts make lots of bad decisions but I really don't see a better way of handling this given the need to protect privacy. As Chief, what would you do if you were handed an evaluation that said guns in their hands represents a significant danger (that's basically the Chief's position)? Someone who has access to the reports needs to either overrule the Chief, or not.

    And I know it's difficult, but this isn't about PTSD yes or no. It's about those 3 specific officers and the reports that have been done. Like most of life PTSD isn't a yes/no, black/white, 0/1 thing. There are a range of reactions, some little more than an annoyance, and others life destroying.
     
    AHM and Rat187 like this.
  22. Rat187

    Rat187 NES Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2016
    Messages:
    1,354
    Likes Received:
    796
    Location:
    Feminist Caliphate of Massachusetts.
    Boss Hogg....lol 'The donut was this big....'
    [​IMG][/QUOTE]
     
    Squib308 likes this.
  23. AHM

    AHM NES Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2013
    Messages:
    5,343
    Likes Received:
    2,661
    Very frustrating how most of the video participants on the Hopkinton topic
    don't reason about the situation using rules that would apply the same to non-police.

    One guy is all, "after the end of last week's episode
    and we finished discussing how to red flag people
    and confiscate their guns, I suddenly realized -
    'what if someone red flags a cop?'".

    Oh really.

    And "Cody Ann" takes it as a given that
    of course no one should lose gun rights
    absent a diagnosis by a medical professional -
    even though the Brady Act can create an FPP
    by the mere existence of a record of involuntary confinement -
    not necessarily because they've got a professional diagnosis.

    A maddening fundamental gap in the narrative is whether
    the three cops are Hopkinton residents with vanilla Hopkinton LTC's issued at the Chief's sole discretion;
    or were "carrying on the badge" (I forget - where is that in MGL - if it really does exist?);
    or have other town's LTCs and the Chief has chosen to pull the Prohibited Person Insanity alarm.

    Because if (if) the cops' LTCs are contingent on the Chief's ongoing feelz that they are "suitable",
    then why all the concern that they get to mount a complex argument about their mental health?

    How many NESers think they're going to follow precisely the same "LTC appeals process"
    open to all Mass. licensees?

    The risk isn't that we won't know the evidence and arguments because of HIPAA confidentiality.

    The risk is that tangential concerns like HIPAA and employee/employer privacy
    will be used as an excuse to conduct the hearings
    in a manner unavailable to The Little People.

    Because no matter who wins, and even if no rulings have precedential weight,
    no one involved on either side will want regular people making the same arguments.


    Well, in theory.
    I wonder if the defendants have been smart enough to hire any of NES's
    celebrated firearms attorneys to assist...
     
  24. 42!

    42! NES Life Member NES Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2010
    Messages:
    5,543
    Likes Received:
    2,684
    No real gap here. An LTC can be issued where you live or work, either way the issuing Chief can revoke for suitability. And while technically it's not just "sole discretion", by statute it public safety, the courts enforce broad discretion, either way if it's challenged the chief will have to give some kind of excuse.

    Carrying on the badge is a perversion of a vague statute that deals with issuing equipment, it does not get you an LTC. It's basically a wink and a nod kind of thing.

    I think it was said (not sure) that it was the medical reports on which the chief based his determination, so that's what they will argue against.

    Of course they will get special treatment, but they will try to make it look normal.

    I'm not so sure about this. Remember that the CoP isn't entitled to medical reports of normal LTC holders, so this is unlikely to come up and the liberal courts aren't likely to let a medical report improperly obtained to be used. But if you are stupid enough to give the chief a negative medical report, thus giving up your HIPAA guaranteed privacy, then sure it will be used.

    But how else do you suggest the protect the officer's privacy and still give them a process of appeal. I expect a lot of closed doors and redacted documents.

    Forgot this;
    An order of involuntary confinement (not sure this is the right term) isn't going to come without some due process, and that will include more than one professional diagnosis.
     
    AHM likes this.
  25. MGnoob

    MGnoob NES Life Member NES Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2014
    Messages:
    3,078
    Likes Received:
    934
    Everyone involved is probably an a**h***... that said it says “shall not be infringed” not “shall not be infringed, unless your an a**h***.”

    I doubt there is a legitimate reason to pull their LTCs..... I never really thought about these red flag laws meaning somone outside of the chief issueong your license getting final say in pulling your license..... but I guess any department can just pull your license? That doesn’t seem right or go with the narrative that your local CLEO know you well enough to violate your right without first committing a crime and being convicted...
    LTCs and red flag laws are not consistent with the constitution.... sorry people are dangerous but until they commit a crime or make a credible threat(which is a crime) they have rights they were born with..
     
    xjma99 and Cap'n Mike like this.
  26. AHM

    AHM NES Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2013
    Messages:
    5,343
    Likes Received:
    2,661
    (Live or own a business; right?)

    While that Suffolk County appeals court's ruling in Phipps v. The Commish that
    ... for a finding of unsuitability to not be arbitrary and capricious,
    the finding must "bear a reasonable nexus to public safety".​
    seems like a bolt from the blue, but it's not even binding in Hopkinton.

    So "some kind of excuse" seems pretty easy to whip up...


    I guess I should at least research it on NES, thanks.

    I confess my eyes glazethed over and I didn't even try to re-read the 140+ replies
    to see if there was even a consistent-sounding news report about such matters.
    (You know how the MSM fabricates whatever they can't manage to just get wrong).

    There's "trying to make it look normal",
    and there's "providing no useful information whatsoever".

    A disappointed lawyer for the 3 police might try and make a stink in the papers if they lose,
    but until/unless they rule out an appeal they might still have nothing substantive to say.

    The flip side is that people aren't entitled to LTCs,
    and Mass. chiefs have made plenty of outrageous demands of applicants.

    In some sense it'd be silly for me to make a long argument that HIPAA
    will be used as an excuse to cloak the reasoning of the outcome.
    It will, or it won't.
    I'm just expressing my concern in advance - laying down a marker.

    Yes; I'm confident that existing processes exist to protect privacy,
    and the court would have no problem figuring out how to employ them.

    But they may prove a handy excuse to keep a ruling unnecessarily opaque.

    I never doubted the need for due process,
    but you're on to something -
    a "72-hour hold" doesn't count:

    Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
    Legal Regulation of Restoration of Firearms Rights After Mental Health Prohibition
    ...
    In 1997, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF) issued regulations defining terms used in the federal legislation including "committed to a mental institution." The agency specified that this ... did not include a person ... held involuntarily in a mental institution on an emergency or temporary detention.​
     
    Last edited: May 29, 2019
    JJ4 likes this.
  27. ridleyman

    ridleyman NES Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012
    Messages:
    2,085
    Likes Received:
    692
    This is a great example of how precarious our rights our. Any POS, of which there are many, can pull our LTC and confiscate our guns on any whim, whether due to a neighbor's made up tale or personal prejudice. This state sucks, as do many more. This is just another liberal way to gut the Bill of Rights for their ultimate power grab somewhere down the road.
     
    Cap'n Mike and Palladin like this.
  28. MGnoob

    MGnoob NES Life Member NES Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2014
    Messages:
    3,078
    Likes Received:
    934
    I don’t like the hard truth...... wish I had a win, win!
     
  29. MGnoob

    MGnoob NES Life Member NES Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2014
    Messages:
    3,078
    Likes Received:
    934
    Ya the state sucks ...... just bow to your overloads!
     
  30. CCW

    CCW

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2013
    Messages:
    870
    Likes Received:
    398
    A cop seems like a dick head? Here's my shocked face: :eek:
     

Share This Page