• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Friend is losing his LTC

Yup. You should lose your right to own guns. Let me know when you want to surrender them to me.

Also, please post a pic of your wife, and I'll let you know if you have to surrender her as well.

You can keep the kids.

[laugh2] that is the funniest post in this thread! Thanks for adding some levity to all of the bickering![rofl]
 
This thread is very telling. It's definitely not the same NES that I joined 6+ years ago. Creeping statism. 16 pages in and no one has been able to establish a victim in this case, other than the dude who crashed and ended up getting hemmed up. Amazing. My list of useless people, gun owners and not, grows daily. Thanks to the mods in this one for keeping it open, and civil.
 
If it is for a 209A, you are correct the federal Lautenberg prohibition REQUIRES said PD to confiscate them.
There is a slight difference between the state and federal prohibition.

The state prohibition kicks in as soon as the 209A issued. The federal prohibition kicks in when the subject either appears in court before a judge, or has the opportunity to do so.
 
If frogs had wings, they wouldn't bump their asses on the ground when they hopped. Hypotheticals do not matter. Again, who was hurt here? NOBODY....if someone was hurt, you nail the responsible person's ass to the wall(possibly literally), as both a punishment and an example. Recidivism rates would be greatly reduced IMO, and the example set would be pretty powerful. Don't prosecute pre-crime, prosecute actual crime and follow up with real consequences.




Then we'd have to ban cars, of course. If it only saves one life.

Red said this......on "that 70's show".......****ing love that guy!!!!!!!!!!!![rofl]
 
If frogs had wings, they wouldn't bump their asses on the ground when they hopped. Hypotheticals do not matter. Again, who was hurt here? NOBODY....if someone was hurt, you nail the responsible person's ass to the wall(possibly literally), as both a punishment and an example. Recidivism rates would be greatly reduced IMO, and the example set would be pretty powerful. Don't prosecute pre-crime, prosecute actual crime and follow up with real consequences.



Then we'd have to ban cars, of course. If it only saves one life.

This is a true example of "with true freedom comes real responsibility". Nobody should need the .gov.....or any mother ****er.......to tell them what is beyond their ability.......but if you **** it up and cause ACTUAL damage to another person.........nail em! That is true freedom and real responsibility and I think youd see DD related crasher fall more than with the current draconian BS!!!!!!!!!!
 
This thread is very telling. It's definitely not the same NES that I joined 6+ years ago. Creeping statism. 16 pages in and no one has been able to establish a victim in this case, other than the dude who crashed and ended up getting hemmed up. Amazing. My list of useless people, gun owners and not, grows daily. Thanks to the mods in this one for keeping it open, and civil.

I'm with you! No victim at all........the OPs buddy should have been able to call a tow truck on his own and be on his way. You should have heard the asshattery with my post about key in the ignition = operating a vehicle! Had about a dozen guys on here that support that BS........sorry......sleeping in a car while intoxicated is not OPERATING WHILE INTOXICED! But there are NESers that support that. [rolleyes]
 
I'm with you! No victim at all........the OPs buddy should have been able to call a tow truck on his own and be on his way. You should have heard the asshattery with my post about key in the ignition = operating a vehicle! Had about a dozen guys on here that support that BS........sorry......sleeping in a car while intoxicated is not OPERATING WHILE INTOXICED! But there are NESers that support that. [rolleyes]


You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to whacko again.


I hear ya. Knowing you've had too much to drink, choosing not to operate a vehicle, preferring not to become hypothermic while sleeping it off....might as well execute them on the spot.
 
If you were the President, would you want the Secret Service having 2 beers at lunch before providing security?

Not saying it should be illegal, but your "right to protect my family" argument angle is pretty weak if you're out drinking while "protecting them."

If I were the President, I would make a POINT of having lunch beers with my Secret Service detail as often as possible. I'd want them thinking "dude, don't let this guy get killed, the VP would NEVER buy us beers at lunch when we don't have important stuff to do." And my wife and my staff would think "oh, he's just doing that as a token of good leadership and respect for the people protecting him, not because it's an awesome excuse to drink beer at lunch WHILE being the leader of the free world!"

I would be a fun President. Beer summits wouldn't be a PR stunt, they'd be a no cameras or press allowed, turn in the keys to Air Force One, nobody leaves Camp David until these kegs are empty and everyone is cool and all this red meat has been grilled and eaten kind of deal. Disputed territory between Israel/Palestine? Foosball, doubles, 2 out of 3. Kidnap the head terrorist in Durkastan, drag him along, get him hooked on bacon, good beer, fine steaks and scotch, Skoal, and internet porn, and release him back to Durkastan a few weeks later to tell everyone how wrong they were and how America is the most awesome magical place in the world, and if they don't believe him start running because he's getting bombs dropped on his face if he doesn't convince them all.

Every election, Americans would be allowed to vote for the LOWEST performing elected official - winner gets summarily fired and deported from the United States, never allowed to return, his retirement forfeited and transferred to charity.

And along with that - beginning of fiscal year, no budget is passed - elections will be held that October 15th for EVERY house and senate seat.
 
I hear ya. Knowing you've had too much to drink, choosing not to operate a vehicle, preferring not to become hypothermic while sleeping it off....might as well execute them on the spot.

[rofl]My brother would approve!
 
This makes so much sense its amazing! again alwaysbeclosing.........tell me who the victim of this aweful "crime" is?
Wacko, you misread my post and neg repped me because you think I don't understand legal process or freedom. Unfortunately, you believe I'm arguing for illegitimate policing when I'm just talking about the immorality of drunk driving and the stupidity of being stupid.

If you decide to read instead of skim, you'll see I never made a single comment about the gun charges. These are illegitimate on their own.

Here's my position on the victims - I'd appreciate if you send your thoughts on official NES letterhead.

Because there was no evidence of a legitimate crime, the identity of the real victim depends on your view of the cop as either:
a) a freedum-hatin' JBT, like all cops (victim = everyone's trampled rights...likely the extent of your thinking)
b) a glorious hero who didn't nail him, but put a paper trail on and disarmed the town idiot (victims = the folks OPs buddy kills next time he's out driving drunk)
c) a bureaucratic tool of torts lawyers who determine what's right and wrong (victims = nobody with a good lawyer and everybody else)
d) all of the above

I'm going with "d"
 
.....I'm just talking about the immorality of drunk driving and the stupidity of being stupid.

You missed the point.

Also, we've had probably a dozen "immorality of drunk driving" threads here over the past few years. They all suck and they all end badly. Let's not turn this one into one of those.
 
with my post about key in the ignition = operating a vehicle! Had about a dozen guys on here that support that BS........sorry......sleeping in a car while intoxicated is not OPERATING WHILE INTOXICED! [rolleyes]

Pardon my ignorance but you can get arrested for being responsible and choosing not to drive?

Second question: if the keys are in your pocket can you still get jammed up?
 
I'm glad I come into these threads.... it reminds me of what I horrible person I am, and that I should lose my rights

Last night, My wife, children and I went out for dinner. A cute little place around the corner from my home ( http://www.cjsparrow.com/ great burgers by the way, and everything is scratch cooked unlike so many chains) and I had 2 beers. I drank 1 before dinner and 1 during dinner (my wife had a pumpkin martini, my kids had a water and a sprite). I then drove home. The entire process of leaving my home, driving to the restaurant, eating and driving home took just over an hour.

According to many here I should be punished. I was carrying my 3913, so some here think I should lose my right to own guns.

It's mind-blowing to me that so many here, on this gun forum, think that my right to protect my family ends because I had a drink with dinner at a restaurant



When are you going again so I can drop a dime?
 
Pardon my ignorance but you can get arrested for being responsible and choosing not to drive?

Second question: if the keys are in your pocket can you still get jammed up?

Funny you ask. YES!

Ask my brother.......posted here before but cliff note version:

Got a bottle on the way to go fishing
drank some vodka while fishing in his canoe (not illegal)
finished fishing
pulled onto shore
said to self.....**** this I'm going to sleep for awhile rather than take a chance on a dwi
left $1000 canoe on ground (important as this is part of his defense)
gets in truck and starts it to run heat (it was early spring and still cold)
falls asleep
cop knocks on window
rolls down window
cop smells booze
cuffed and stuffed for OUI

Yes in most states you can be arrested for operating under the influence just because the key is in the ignition.........and its BS. And yes there are NESers that think being drunk while sleeping in a truck with the key in the ignition while NOT driving should be an arrestable offense........I'll leave it at that.
 
Last edited:
Impaired is defined for OUI- not for possessing a gun. This would leave the law open to interpretation. WAS THIS GUN AN AMT BACKUP in .45 cal??????????????????????????????
A local shop sold one of mine to a guy and failed to report it- then it looked like it was mine- had to go get proof of the sale!!!!!
 
You missed the point.

Also, we've had probably a dozen "immorality of drunk driving" threads here over the past few years. They all suck and they all end badly. Let's not turn this one into one of those.
Errr...okay, so with morality and accountability off the table, then talking about "proof" and "evidence" presumes a crime, and all crimes have tangible victims, and nobody's really suffered here, so there's no crime, so no harm, no foul...I think got it.

Seriously, is that the point here? If not, I'm hopelessly lost...
 
To back up whacko, I had a buddy on my boat get jammed up for the same thing. He was at subvets, a local watering hole for submarine vets much like a VFW, anyway, closing time came and he questioned driving. He climbed in the back seat so it was obvious he wasn't trying to drive, and started/warmed the truck up. Same thing, cop comes up and arrests him because the key was in the ignition. Took him thousands and thousands to beat it. Sofa king wee todd did
 
Errr...okay, so with morality and accountability off the table, then talking about "proof" and "evidence" presumes a crime, and all crimes have tangible victims, and nobody's really suffered here, so there's no crime, so no harm, no foul...I think got it.

Seriously, is that the point here? If not, I'm hopelessly lost...
You truly do not understand the mind freeing, cost saving, freedom supporting experience of being a libertarian do you? [grin]
 
I don't see how any gun owner could not have sympathy for this guy given what information is currently available.

Because so many people in this state don't actually believe in freedom anymore. It is like they HAVE to have big brother running their lives because they can't make their own decisions and have their own opinions. It is f***ing pathetic.
 
Many years ago I had the occasional habit of sleeping a bender off in the back of my pickup. Cop bangs on my cap to wake me up and gives me a hassle. He then tries to get me to go in the cab and get my registration.
Told him sorry wasn't driving, not going anywhere near the wheel and can I go pass out at a buddies within stumbling distance.
I'm certain he was trying for a dui as I was closer to fatal than sober and would have needed a good 8 hours to be legal.
Being responsible sometimes isn't enough to keep you out of trouble with the state's revenue recovery team
 
Funny you ask. YES!

Ask my brother.......posted here before but cliff note version:

Got a bottle on the way to go fishing
drank some vodka while fishing in his canoe (not illegal)
finished fishing
pulled onto shore
said to self.....**** this I'm going to sleep for awhile rather than take a chance on a dwi
left $1000 canoe on ground (important as this is part of his defense)
gets in truck and starts it to run heat (it was early spring and still cold)
falls asleep
cop knocks on window
rolls down window
cop smells booze
cuffed and stuffed for OUI

Yes in most states you can be arrested for operating under the influence just because the key is in the ignition.........and its BS. And yes there are NESers that think being drunk while sleeping in a truck with the key in the ignition while NOT driving should be an arrestable offense........I'll leave it at that.
So if I'm at a house party and go out to put up my Windows if it rains I can get cuffed?

Lmao. Seems pretty ridiculous.
 
Many years ago I had the occasional habit of sleeping a bender off in the back of my pickup. Cop bangs on my cap to wake me up and gives me a hassle. He then tries to get me to go in the cab and get my registration.
Told him sorry wasn't driving, not going anywhere near the wheel and can I go pass out at a buddies within stumbling distance.
I'm certain he was trying for a dui as I was closer to fatal than sober and would have needed a good 8 hours to be legal.
Being responsible sometimes isn't enough to keep you out of trouble with the state's revenue recovery team

See what I'm saying people........what business did the officer even have to ask Pastera for his registration in the first ****ing place. Was he suspected of "sleeping in a truck bed"? Jesus Christ the freedom being squashed by this crap is so mind numbingly simple for me to see it hurts my head to wonder why some people here don't see it.
 
So if I'm at a house party and go out to put up my Windows if it rains I can get cuffed?

Lmao. Seems pretty ridiculous.

Dude.....similar story was Actually posted here before. Guy gets drunk at a bar........CALLS A CAB.........cab gets there and drunk guy remembers he left something in his car........goes to his car to get something out of it.....all while a cop was watching and he pinched him the second he got in the front seat! Cabbie even tried to talk the cop out of it!

I'll see if I can dig it up.

Darksideblues42 posted this:

I know someone who had a couple too many after a wedding, so he called a cab.

Officer showed up, asked what the deal was, he said he was just waiting on the cab.

The cab driver showed up, blocked him in to his parking space, friend used his key fob to pop his trunk to grab his gym bag for a change of clothes, but also ended up unlocking his doors and putting his windows down.

He sits with the driver's door open and his feet still on the ground, puts the key in, turns the car to "run" without starting it, puts the windows up....

Officer friendly sees this transpire and as friend is locking his car, he detained under suspicion of OUI. Passes field tests, blows a .082 and is arrested.

Cabbie testified at his trial and confirmed his version of events....Judge dismissed case, but we all know it could have just as easily gone the other way.....

Key in ignition should not equal "operating" if there is compelling evidence as to your intent...
 
Last edited:
See what I'm saying people........what business did the officer even have to ask Pastera for his registration in the first ****ing place. Was he suspected of "sleeping in a truck bed"? Jesus Christ the freedom being squashed by this crap is so mind numbingly simple for me to see it hurts my head to wonder why some people here don't see it.
If he was concerned about safety, he would have called a bus for me to get me treated for alcohol poisoning.

Not a cop bashing, just recognizing that for a lot of officers the public good is not priority one.
 
Back
Top Bottom