walter62
NES Member
Maybe we can help them by explaining what the word 'redacted' means?
There was a clear loss of understanding there.
There was a clear loss of understanding there.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Is it Dominatrixes or Dominatrices???? It's Index and Indices. Inquiring minds wanna know so the dominatrixes/ces won't kick my ass as much if I get it wrong. LOLYou had me dominatrixes….
Yep. New England is the BASTION of NIMBY's. They ran nukulur power out of the region. The whole gas line bullspit in NH. "You can't do that!" Gimme a break. My current house - Shell gas line runs thru the back of it. Closed, but maintained. My NEW house will have a MAIN TRUNK running through it. ZOMG!!!! THEGASSSSS!!!!!!! It plays like a 1980's "buy oil heat, we don't a'splode" commercial.Considering the fights everyone puts over a single pot shop, especially near schools, etc., they absolutely would. Because they're all authoritarian, puritanical NIMBYs. Even the ones that support liberalized MJ laws want it on the other side of town; or better still, in the next town.
The pot shop is down the road on 110 in Ayer. I have no idea if they have one in Littleton but they do have a few liquor serving establishments within half a mile including package stores.
The Karen's do need their wine and booze close by.
I didnt think one room could be filled with so many scared Karens...
Not a lawyer but does this cross the line for slander? Even if it doesn't I would attempt to sue them if I had the money. Just for the sake of doing it.
Nah. It has no detrimental effect on him. It's pretty accurate, anyway.
Besides, if it's in print, it's libel. Not slander, though slander is a cooler-sounding word.
which is surprising, since 90% of Fark is liberalThis story made the front page of Fark, the comments are 90% positive:
80 gun dealers in one old mill? Outrageous to blue-state villagers. Most convenient shopping ever for their police, located right down the street
80 gun dealers in one old mill? Outrageous to blue-state villagers. Most convenient shopping ever for their police, located right down the streetwww.fark.com
If you advertise a gun for sale for more than you paid for it with the intent to make a profit, you need an FFL. There's no need to "prove" research, writing, or any other nonsense. Buy a gun, put it on Gunbroker for more than you paid for it, and you need an FFL. Whether you sell it or not, you've proved intent. It's not complicated.
I don't want to kiss you, would be my retort. Take that how ever you want to.
Interesting that it wasn't called a cache of gun shops, or an arsenal....
True, but I think EC was talking about meeting the requirement for an FFL to be engaged in commercial operations. I.e., you can turn around to the ATF and say you're engaged in it with that intent with such a simple transaction, even if that doesn't trigger the average Joe to HAVE to get one.This is not true. See the ATF publication here, making a profit is one criterion but not the sole criterion for determining if you need an FFL.
My previous house lot had a gas main (6" high pressure steel) running through it. There were plans for an upgrade to 12" (not sure if that started as planned), and a legal fight regarding the license/easement. Opponents who did not want to see their yard dug up claimed the easement for one pipeline meant Eversource would have to remove the existing pipeline to do the upgrade.My current house - Shell gas line runs thru the back of it. Closed, but maintained. My NEW house will have a MAIN
Such a funny document wherein they have to give a bunch of examples because they don't want to set a "bright line" or have any hard and fast rules.This is not true. See the ATF publication here, making a profit is one criterion but not the sole criterion for determining if you need an FFL.
When the Wethersfield problem happened in Natick (development with buried leaking oil tanks hitting homeowners with blank-check state certified cleanup jobs running over $100k), it was a missed opportunity for the natural gas industry to run ads "we don't expose you to an unlimited hazmat financial risk".It plays like a 1980's "buy oil heat, we don't a'splode" commercial.
I say we import a s-ton of Texans into the town and teach these people what property rights are.
I can't recall the name of the dude who did that but they found out about it as a result of a FOIA request and the guy who requested it was part of an anti gun group in NY I believe.Agreed and understood. My point was there was that there is an exception that does not require the intent to make a profit selling guns in order to hold an FFL.
It is interesting that a crackdown on the interstate transfer without FFL provision created a pathway to an FFL for otherwise ineligible persons.I can't recall the name of the dude who did that but they found out about it as a result of a FOIA request and the guy who requested it was part of an anti gun group in NY I believe.
Its funny how that works sometimes lolIt is interesting that a crackdown on the interstate transfer without FFL provision created a pathway to an FFL for otherwise ineligible persons.
they are looking to see if you are "engaged in the business" and not building a personal collection. Seeking to sell for a profit is an aspect but there are other ways to be engaged in the business but not making profit off the dealing in firearms.True, but I think EC was talking about meeting the requirement for an FFL to be engaged in commercial operations. I.e., you can turn around to the ATF and say you're engaged in it with that intent with such a simple transaction, even if that doesn't trigger the average Joe to HAVE to get one.
I do see how you can read his statement as you did, but it was more a rebuttal to the whole issue about justifying it to ATF.
Victims of fake news have legal rights under defamation law. Just sayingEven the Globe knows the AG BS isn't the law. But they are promoting it's enforcement anyway. That doesn't sound legal.
You are not supposed to buy the FFL to "enhance a personal collection". However, you can bring in whatever you want and log it into your dealer inventory and use it if you want. After a year you can do what you want with the stuff. Jack.they are looking to see if you are "engaged in the business" and not building a personal collection. Seeking to sell for a profit is an aspect but there are other ways to be engaged in the business but not making profit off the dealing in firearms.
It is interesting that a crackdown on the interstate transfer without FFL provision created a pathway to an FFL for otherwise ineligible persons.
And if they weren’t good for fcuking there would be a bounty on them.
This is not true. See the ATF publication here, making a profit is one criterion but not the sole criterion for determining if you need an FFL.
they are looking to see if you are "engaged in the business" and not building a personal collection. Seeking to sell for a profit is an aspect but there are other ways to be engaged in the business but not making profit off the dealing in firearms.