Serious question, the Infection Fatality Rate turned out to look exponential with age of infected person:
You're basically proposing the "let 'er rip" public health strategy, e.g., don't do anything different, it's more cost than benefit to take any preventive measures.
What kind of infection fatality rate curve would cause you to take different measures? If it were 2% in your age group? 5%? 10%
Just curious where you set the threshold. And remember, it's not just a personal decision, with communicable diseases, unless you think Typhoid Mary
was a libertarian hero.