Knob Creek
NES Member
What a bunch of Libtards. A bunch of small groups beating the same drum. When I spoke I specifically said that although I belong to the NRA and to GOAL they provided me no talking points to repeat unlike other groups.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Make no mistake; it is scripted. The anti gun groups have been working on these for a month, and have disseminated this amongst one another.
Yes, they have all repeated it verbatim.
What a bunch of Libtards. A bunch of small groups beating the same drum....
one thing i took out of this is,
the women are frightened.
and the vocal ones - the ones who have no idea how guns function,and never saw one up close are trying to ban all guns as the answer,
and the rest of the women are signing up for ltc's and going for training.
we need women spokspersons, they will carry more weight,right or wrong, that's how I see it.
The panel, ... were really interested in comments you could make on specific bills. ...
One Gun a month: ...
Seven Round Magazine: ...
Insurance for guns: Compared it to having insurance to use your First Amendment Rights in case you libel someone.
Ammunition and Gun Tax: Suggested like most taxes it affects those who can afford it least.
Class B license: Agreed they should be discontinued.
FID for Pepper Spray: Agreed it should be discontinued.
Seemed very interested when I said my firearms classes were running 60-70% women.
one thing i took out of this is,
the women are frightened.
... the women are signing up for ltc's and going for training.
we need women spokespersons, they will carry more weight,right or wrong, that's how I see it.
You have a excellent point there. The panel did seem interested in my women students. We need women at the next meeting ...
One Gun a month: ... We need a solid couple arguments against this
Seven Round Magazine: ... We need a solid couple arguments against this
Insurance for guns: Compared it to having insurance to use your First Amendment Rights in case you libel someone. Good one!
Ammunition and Gun Tax: Suggested like most taxes it affects those who can afford it least. Unlike most taxes, this one could be life threatening!
Class B license: Agreed they should be discontinued. Who agreed? You, or the committee?
FID for Pepper Spray: Agreed it should be discontinued. Who agreed? You, or the committee?
Seemed very interested when I said my firearms classes were running 60-70% women. They are probably trying to figure out a way to ban women from these classes.
What I learned is that Massachusetts firearm laws are fraught with conflicts and vagueness. A licensed gun owner faces a lot of uncertainty and potential legal jeopardy. Here are just two examples:
As a resident of Canton, the Chief of Police has a policy that first-time applicants will only be issued Class B restricted license, but may be upgraded to Class-A unrestricted sometime later; the neighboring town Sharon, as a general practice, never issues Class-A unrestricted to anyone; another neighbor Stoughton, typically issue Class-A unrestricted. The discretionary licensing gives police chiefs wholesale level power to deny people in a town the right to keep and bear arms, that is just wrong.
I am a sales professional and I have many customers in higher education and healthcare industry. Sometimes my plan changes while I am out in the middle of the day and I have to show up at a hospital in the afternoon. I have to ask myself: is it a regular hospital or teaching hospital? If it’s a teaching hospital, I cannot carry and have two options other than dropping my gun at home first:
#1 unload my gun and put it in a locked container then in the car trunk. If someone sees my gun during this process and call the cop, I’ll be deemed unsuited and lose my license;
#2, if my gun locked in trunk is stolen, my chief could still deem me unsuitable because a car trunk is not secure enough in a public parking garage.
In either case, if I lose my license, I lose all my guns. Many here are collectors with collections worth tens of thousands of dollars. This is the jeopardy we face every day. Gun owners like me bend over backwards to make sure we stay compliant with the law. I wonder how many gang bangers and determined mass murders think about these laws before they commit their crimes?
First time I walked by the Federal court in the waterfront, I was awed by the quote by John Adams: ‘The dignity and stability of government in all its branches, the morals of the people and every blessing of society, depends so much upon an upright and skillful administration of justice.
The case law history has shown that the convoluted gun laws in Massachusetts have done little to prevent violent crimes, but have been quite effective in prosecuting lawful gun owners on technicalities. There is nothing upright and skillful about the gun laws in Massachusetts. The proposed new bills by Rep Linsky and many others will make legal gun ownership in Massachusetts more perilous, without addressing any of the underlying issues of gun violence.
Quote from rabbi: (paraphrasing as accurate as possible)
Then one whack job gets up and spouts nothing but ignorance and F's it up for everyone...
One Gun a month: ... We need a solid couple arguments against this
My tranny blew out in the dad Mobile on the way up today so some info from the fellas who ho would be awsome I will be going to the one in Worcester!
You have a excellent point there. The panel did seem interested in my women students. We need women at the next meeting to counteract the GAG (Grandmothers against Guns) and the other women Rabbi's and Episcopal ministers that droned on about the assigned talking points.
There's one in every crowd.
Dare I ask what was said, or is it one of those things I'm better off nor knowing about?
A gentleman with a giant of a voice (boy, he didn't need the microphone), and somehow linked gun rights with legalizing prostitution. Were we in a liberterian convention, yeah, bring it on, but today wasn't the occasion.
Murder rate in MA has doubled since 1997 but is down about 40% for the US over the same period. Most of the country sees gun rights improve during those years and an improvement in murder rate. MA is the perfect test case for failed gun control since the 1998 legislation.
If there's any reason to suspect a license holder is involved in multiple firearms purchases for illegal street sales, the issuing authority can deny or revoke that license.
"What I learned is that Massachusetts firearm laws are fraught with conflicts and vagueness. A licensed gun owner faces a lot of uncertainty and potential legal jeopardy."
Yep. Even some of the pro-gun folks quoted 'Massachusetts has one of nation's toughest gun laws' as some sort of badge of honor, I just wanted to say on the record, that 'the existing laws are F'd up, let's not make'em F'd up even more'.
There was a 28-yr-old mom of two boys who testified before me. She told me her NES handle but I didn't hear clearly with someone else talking. She was excellent, and kudos to the two young boys who patiently and politely sat hours through the session!
Beretta92FS - The storage laws would be for particular long guns only, basically the most common and popular rifles owned today - the AR platforms... along with a select group of other "scary" looking arms.
The idea is that these particularly dangerous weapons (used in less that 2% of all firearm deaths), will no longer be able to be used in crimes. This one to me is absolutely a reaction to Newtown. At the Franklin meeting a very well studied and spoken Prof. Leverentez stated - "Responding based on rare events and fears can create policies that are really problematic". Both Professors stated similar findings in there combined decades of research.
It was also stated in the Franklin meeting that no one hunts with these type of weapons, nor is a good choice for self defense. Nevermind if those OPINIONS are even correct... why is that decision up to anyone besides you and how you deem to protect you and yours?
You all make valid points. You should go to the hearings and have your voices heard.
*thanks mlaboss for the Professors quote above - I knew you had quoted it in a different thread.
Linsky was promoting these at the forum in Bedford Monday night. I'd agree that the goal is to have more people hear from the gun control folks.
Linsky introduces himself by stating his credentials as a former prosecutor who prosecuted (I forget how many) homicide cases, and stating that seeing a dead child sticks with you, hence his 35 year effort to pass laws that will cut down on senseless deaths.
As it was reiterated to us repeatedly by grannies and friends of jorge, it is not our right but a privilege that has been bestowed to us.