The problem is not that the courses are good or bad; properly delivered or done poorly.
The problem is not that courses are required
The problem is that too many people have no mentor, no experienced shooter to show them the ropes, and are left to the vageries of instructors that may or may not have the students' best interests at heart.
I got my LTC long enough ago that there was no course required, but my dad had taught me. My kids will take, or have taken (one is an Apprentice Instructor in BP and HFS) the course to meet the requirements. But the majority of the knowledge that they have will not have come from the course, but from me, and from other shooters that "have done it" and have passed along the info.
What's the solutiuon? Damned if I know, short of requiring a mandatory school course, led by "real" shooters, involving real shooting. Ideally, we'd all be letting all our non-shooting friends know that we're happy to teach them, and they take us up on the offer.
In the real (Mass) world, I guess that we who hold the Certs., and teach, do it right, and self-police our ranks.
This past weekend, I helped in my Club's BP course, and one student said that he'd taken several different courses (!) - I believe him, as he had a very nice target - and that we'd given out a lot more info than others he'd taken. I asked if he was a reporter or a spy
, and he said, "No, I just believe in training." While I appreciated his positive review.....we were teaching the Official Party-Approved Course....what were the namelss others teaching?