JayMcB
NES Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2011
- Messages
- 22,397
- Likes
- 109,433
They do in MA
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
They do in MA
You can add bare hands and feet to the list too!
ggboy
You have no real rights in any one-party Dim-controlled state. Especially one with a protected class tyrant for an AG.You have rights in MA?
Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut responded to last week’s Las Vegas massacre by issuing a statement in which he claimed: “Already this year there have been more mass shootings than days in the year.” That was last Monday, the 275th day of 2017. Can Mr. Murphy possibly be right?
Certainly not by the ordinary definition of “mass shootings,” which includes attacks such as the one in Las Vegas this month, at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Fla., in 2016, and at Colorado’s Columbine High School in 1999. Of late such infamous crimes have hit the national news several times a year—nowhere near a daily basis. Gun-control advocates like Mr. Murphy seek to alarm the public by exaggerating the scale of the problem.
Rosenthal is such a ****bag.
Is there any new NEWS on what linsky thing is, like does it have a bill number so i can call and oppose it?
Tell us something we don't know. LOL
Ditto. I checked Linsky's webpage. Just a HD#. No hard links to a bill yet.
I hate to say it, but we are going to lose bumpfire in MA. And we are going to have them registered federally. It's a foregone notion at this point. This idiot in LV didn't have A bump-fire stock. He had BUNCHES of them.
Will it help the nation?? No.
Does that matter??? Not to the guys and gals that want to pass this to get re-elected by the moronic masses.
We are going to lose this battle. I hope we preserve the pre-ban mags. Short of that, we are vastly outnumbered.
Aren't bump-fire stocks by their nature of being 'adjustable', as in moving back and forth already banned in MA?
Aren't bump-fire stocks by their nature of being 'adjustable', as in moving back and forth already banned in MA?
Tell us something we don't know. LOL
Ditto. I checked Linsky's webpage. Just a HD#. No hard links to a bill yet.
I hate to say it, but we are going to lose bumpfire in MA. And we are going to have them registered federally. It's a foregone notion at this point. This idiot in LV didn't have A bump-fire stock. He had BUNCHES of them.
Will it help the nation?? No.
Does that matter??? Not to the guys and gals that want to pass this to get re-elected by the moronic masses.
We are going to lose this battle. I hope we preserve the pre-ban mags. Short of that, we are vastly outnumbered.
Tell us something we don't know. LOL
Ditto. I checked Linsky's webpage. Just a HD#. No hard links to a bill yet.
Thanks for that. I missed the doc, and wondered why this has been hidden on the states website.
So, if i were to substitute a factory trigger with an adjustable trigger, or a trigger that provides less over-travel and or a shorter reset; in theory i just modified a firearm to shoot faster, an am now in violation.
That terminology is so wide and vague - typical poorly written firearm law.
There's a lot to read here. Where do we stand on the pre-ban mag portion of this nonsense?
You get a felony, and you get a felony, and you get a felony, and we all get a felony.
We all go out and buy 30 of them and throw them in our safes and pray.
Pass it - and we buy Pmags - why pay the premium for ‘prebans’ - of course I’m already there.
You do not understand the definition of the term.Ex post facto.
Where's GOAL? Telegram article says bipartisan support for this bill.
You do not understand the definition of the term.
Ex post facto would be "You are in violation if you possessed a useful mag before the law was passed", not "you are in violation if you continue to possess it".
You do not understand the definition of the term.
Ex post facto would be "You are in violation if you possessed a useful mag before the law was passed", not "you are in violation if you continue to possess it".
Sort of what Healy did with ARs...
She "sort of" did it by not prosecuting people who bought them post MA ban but pre Healy ban.Sort of what Healy did with ARs...
But wait... That is a thing they do...She "sort of" did it by not prosecuting people who bought them post MA ban but pre Healy ban.
Ex post facto is telling a minor that his criminal record will not be used against him as an adult if he takes the plea deal, and then changing the law later so that the record is unsealed and retroactively used as an LTC disqualifier.