Fatal Shooting in Worcester by Westborough LTC holder UPDATE: Guilty of Involuntary Manslaughter! 4-7 Year Sentence with 77 Days Credit.

[SFC13557]

Hmm, still no ID of the deceased individual?

 

[Tartakovsky]

Hmm, still no ID of the deceased individual?

Scumbag. Guaranteed. Police are trying the shooter in the court of public opinion first then in a real court he goes. Less sympathy for the “victim” if he’s a piece of shit felon with a record. No other reason to withhold the name of the “victim”.

 

[SFC13557]

Scumbag. Guaranteed. Police are trying the shooter in the court of public opinion first then in a real court he goes. Less sympathy for the “victim” if he’s a piece of shit felon with a record. No other reason to withhold the name of the “victim”.

Very strange, are they going to wait for the shooter's arraignment? I can't ever remember a shooting where the Cops are hiding the victim's identity.
Where is the press?

 

[Tartakovsky]

Very strange, are they going to wait for the shooter's arraignment? I can't ever remember a shooting where the Cops are hiding the victim's identity.
Where is the press?

Very strange indeed. But its MA afterall. Can’t have vigilantes running around protecting themselves from scumbags afterall.

 

[Rob Boudrie]

Very strange, are they going to wait for the shooter's arraignment? I can't ever remember a shooting where the Cops are hiding the victim's identity.
Where is the press?

Some of these town rags consider reading press releases journalism. When Framingham withheld Offier Duncan's name in the Eurie Stamps shooting the Middlesex News rolled with it - no editor chomping on a seegar yelling "I want that name, verifiable to journalistic standards, by press time tomorrow". The local paper's idea of "investigative journalism" is finding out when the community Christmas tree lighting will take place.

 

[Rob Boudrie]

If you look at the profile of the shooter - LTC holder, no history or criminal record, totally disarmed by the PD after the shooting, etc. there is no way this is what one would consider a "dangerous person" to have out on the streets. It's a use of questionable judgment, with no indication this person would be the type to go out and procure an illegal gun so he could engage in more questionable allegedly defensive shootings.

But, a month long delay for a "dangerousness hearing" to impose immediate pre-conviction punishment; impair his ability to work with his attorney on a defense; and sending a clear message that allegedly poor judgement by the otherwise law abiding will be hit harder with the hammer than intentional crime.

 

[KilgoreTrout]

my wife didn't grow up in new england and she knows to never stop near worcester, not even for gas.

i don't have a punisher skull with the thin blue line on my f150, but i'm pretty sure the "civil rights violations" are massatwoshits politicians out of touch of reality and upset at what it means for police to do their job in a diverse, inclusive city

Ah, sweet “I didn’t read it but I’ll share my ignorant opinion on the very matter because it fits my agenda” man.

Maybe look into the investigation, mate. It’s ugly. Preying on human beings.

 

[fencer]

If the victim was a member of a politically protected class, the shooter will be arrested. Even if the shoot was textbook.

In Massachusetts? The victim's identity is irrelevant. You are going to be arrested, charged and most likely indicted.
You could wake up in the middle of the night, with an assailant standing over your bed with a knife, and you will be arrested, if you shoot them.

 

[Tartakovsky]

In Massachusetts? The victim's identity is irrelevant. You are going to be arrested, charged and most likely indicted.
You could wake up in the middle of the night, with an assailant standing over your bed with a knife, and you will be arrested, if you shoot them.

GTFO of MA

 

[DJBrad]

GTFO of MA

I’m aiming to!

 

[Coyote33]

... No other reason to withhold the name of the “victim”.

... are they going to wait for the shooter's arraignment? I can't ever remember a shooting where the Cops are hiding the victim's identity. ...

In Massachusetts? The victim's identity is irrelevant.

Samuel Peckham is the victim's name. It was in the very first post here.

 

[free]

Hmm, still no ID of the deceased individual?

I think his name is John Smith.

 

[fencer]

Samuel Peckham is the victim's name. It was in the very first post here.

I am aware of that. You took it out of context. Reference the post I was replying to.

 

[Coyote33]

I am aware of that. You took it out of context. Reference the post I was replying to.

So, you are saying the victim is going to be arrested, charged and most likely indicted?

 

[DJBrad]

I think his name is John Smith.

I think it’s Vger

 

[HorizontalHunter]

I think it’s Vger

 

[Tartakovsky]

Samuel Peckham is the victim's name. It was in the very first post here.

I don’t mean the victim to us. I meant the victim to the state. The state considers the dead guy and most likely the aggressor, the victim.

 

[SFC13557]

Samuel Peckham is the victim's name. It was in the very first post here.

Peckham is the shooter according to post and article. I asked for the deceased name.

 

[free]

Peckham is the shooter according to post and article. I asked for the deceased name.

Which is John Smith, 31.

 

[heck ya beaches]

Ah, sweet “I didn’t read it but I’ll share my ignorant opinion on the very matter because it fits my agenda” man.

Maybe look into the investigation, mate. It’s ugly. Preying on human beings.

thanks for this, mr "it's her turn"

 

[Coyote33]

I don’t mean the victim to us. I meant the victim to the state. The state considers the dead guy and most likely the aggressor, the victim.

Wait, isn't the aggressor the guy who broke in the window, the one who got dead?

 

[headednorth]

Wait, isn't the aggressor the guy who broke in the window, the one who got dead?

I havent read anything that says for sure who broke the window or how. Its likely the other guy broke the window and the driver fired after that but possible (although not likely imo) the driver fired through the window for some reason

 

[42!]

I havent read anything that says for sure who broke the window or how. Its likely the other guy broke the window and the driver fired after that but possible (although not likely imo) the driver fired through the window for some reason

from the article "Peckham told investigators the other man broke a window of his car,"

What many have assumed, but is not stated, is where Peckham was when the window was broken. Was he in the car, or standing somewhere outside of the car.

 

[HARRYM]

Tough to follow all of this. I have read this all again and I'm still not really sure if the victim was even in a car. But, I could have missed it.

 

[DJBrad]

This aussie is showing great restraint. I would have gassed it brrrrrrrrrap!


View: https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cmb7CU2scxF/?igshid=MDJmNzVkMjY=

 

[drgrant]

This aussie is showing great restraint. I would have gassed it brrrrrrrrrap!


View: https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cmb7CU2scxF/?igshid=MDJmNzVkMjY=

the boomerang…..

at least it wasnt a dirigidoo? lol

 

[heck ya beaches]

This aussie is showing great restraint. I would have gassed it brrrrrrrrrap!


View: https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cmb7CU2scxF/?igshid=MDJmNzVkMjY=

did you know that australia loves meth and steroids? just a fun fact

 

[DJBrad]

did you know that australia loves meth and steroids? just a fun fact

I love fun facts. Thank you.

Did you know it’s legal for Japanese to have relations with 13 year olds? That’s the age of consent. Don’t let a few NES’rs read this fun fact!

 

[DJBrad]

So I have been searching the orbituaries for Worcester funeral homes and I didn’t find anything on the victim but I did get surprised to see an old high school acquaintance had passed

 

[heck ya beaches]

I love fun facts. Thank you.

Did you know it’s legal for Japanese to have relations with 13 year olds? That’s the age of consent. Don’t let a few NES’rs read this fun fact!

wow, that's a fun fact. did you know that germany thinks 14 year olds can consent? it's almost like america should have dropped more nukes in ww2 and then had open borders with russia