e-FA10. It's officially a mess!

It would cost FRB next to nothing to contract hire a competent* programmer to revise the scanning system to modern standards. Then they could simply tell people to print their own forms again, scan them as they come in and then shred the paper. Heck, if they asked the Comp Sci dept at MIT they'd probably get the coding for free.

Compare that to the cost of having carbonless forms printed and distributed.


You're right, having reasonable OCR software (or be wiling to sanity check them by hand) would be great! However, that doesn't make the problem go away. The state needs to provide paper forms to anyone who wants them, to police stations, and to gun shops (for individual use, not the shop's, that's covered elsewhere.)

Why? Because being able to download a PDF and print it on a reasonable printer isn't available to everyone. You shouldn't need to have a computer and a printer and internet access to sell a gun. It's not even about economics, I know a lot of tech-savvy people with iPhones and wireless in their house and FiOS so they can swap porn with Bittorrent at 21st century speeds, but they don't have printers. You shouldn't have to buy a printer to sell a gun, either.
 
I'm wondering which is more likely to succeed: convincing the legislature to do away with the reporting requirements, or convincing them to force the FRB to provide paper forms?
 
I'm wondering which is more likely to succeed: convincing the legislature to do away with the reporting requirements, or convincing them to force the FRB to provide paper forms?

Follow the money. Which one costs more? That is what they will want to choose.

Really, when it comes down to budget crunching time, this is where we need to push them.

They are holding sessions now:
Good news, bad news on the menu at Billerica legislative breakfast forum



2. “Are we providing the desired public services?”
 
You're right, having reasonable OCR software (or be wiling to sanity check them by hand) would be great! However, that doesn't make the problem go away. The state needs to provide paper forms to anyone who wants them, to police stations, and to gun shops (for individual use, not the shop's, that's covered elsewhere.)

Why? Because being able to download a PDF and print it on a reasonable printer isn't available to everyone. You shouldn't need to have a computer and a printer and internet access to sell a gun. It's not even about economics, I know a lot of tech-savvy people with iPhones and wireless in their house and FiOS so they can swap porn with Bittorrent at 21st century speeds, but they don't have printers. You shouldn't have to buy a printer to sell a gun, either.

Providing a PDF electronically and printouts of it on paper satisfies both needs.

So, of course, does abolishing the registration in the first place.

Before someone reminds me it isn't really registration, I used the term deliberately. It is what it is.
 
Didn't the NRA shoot down something at the federal level, requiring all records to be destroyed? We need that here, and sooner rather than later. I think I read that this Jason guy has left. So, who is in charge there now? THIS IS THE PERFECT TIME TO TRY TO GET THIS WHOLE SHEBANG DEFUNDED AND SHUT DOWN.
 
Providing a PDF electronically and printouts of it on paper satisfies both needs.

Yes. So does providing providing paper forms and having the eFA10. The problem is that they're *not* providing printouts.

But fundamentally, they have to provide the paper forms. If they don't, failing to provide paper forms and requiring people to have a computer, internet access, and a printer to print the form is no different than failing to provide paper forms and requiring people to have a computer, internet access, and use the eFA10. That's what I was getting at.

One huge advantage of the printable PDF is that we could go to the local police station and they could print some for us like they were doing for a while. That would be a step in the right direction.

So, of course, does abolishing the registration in the first place.

Absolutely. No question. Cost savings for the state, more liberty/freedom for citizens, and no effect whatsoever on public safety.
 
Providing a PDF electronically and printouts of it on paper satisfies both needs.

Yes. So does providing providing paper forms and having the eFA10. The problem is that they're *not* providing printouts.

But fundamentally, they have to provide the paper forms. If they don't, failing to provide paper forms and requiring people to have a computer, internet access, and a printer to print the form is no different than failing to provide paper forms and requiring people to have a computer, internet access, and use the eFA10. That's what I was getting at.

I agree that the (only) eFA10 constructively deprives the poor of their 2A rights. Also people that "just aren't technical" or are illiterate (yes, we still have them and they still have rights). It requires you to invite people into your home or go into theirs or conduct a transfer in the lobby of Starbucks or the local Public Library.

The current carbonless form is just fine by if if they would just DISTRIBUTE them. The advantage to the PDF form is that it doesn't require some little Napoleon to dole out the precious forms. You email the form to the PD (or they download it) and they print it. Or you do if you *do* have a computer and a printer.

The FRBies claim has been that the existing scanning system uses antiquated equipment and software that can't tolerate any variance in the form (supposedly due to the variance in people's printers).
 
Don't know about epic..... but the system worked fine today and earlier this evening... did 2 EFA-10's today..

Worked ok for me yesterday but there was a moment of apprehension when I tried to print out the form and the computer froze up. Eventually it came back and I was able to print the document. Not sure what I would have done if the GD thing didn't print as I didn't write down the transaction number.
 
Worked ok for me yesterday but there was a moment of apprehension when I tried to print out the form and the computer froze up. Eventually it came back and I was able to print the document. Not sure what I would have done if the GD thing didn't print as I didn't write down the transaction number.

Wow, that's a rock solid system there. I bet a paper form wouldn't have had that potential problem.

- - - Updated - - -

Don't know about epic..... but the system worked fine today and earlier this evening... did 2 EFA-10's today..

You really have no understanding of the issues.
 
Worked ok for me yesterday but there was a moment of apprehension when I tried to print out the form and the computer froze up. Eventually it came back and I was able to print the document. Not sure what I would have done if the GD thing didn't print as I didn't write down the transaction number.

That "freeze" was the state sucking up the contents of your PC for later investigation, once they found out you own guns.

(I can't believe I have to say it, but I'm kidding.)
 
Didn't the NRA shoot down something at the federal level, requiring all records to be destroyed? We need that here, and sooner rather than later. I think I read that this Jason guy has left. So, who is in charge there now? THIS IS THE PERFECT TIME TO TRY TO GET THIS WHOLE SHEBANG DEFUNDED AND SHUT DOWN.

Applies only at the federal level. ATF is not allowed to capture or computerize retail gun sale data. Thats why when there is a crime, they go to the manufacturer who looks up the sn and tells them the distribuor who looks up the sn and tells them the dealer, who looks up the sn and provides a copy of the 4473 and shows their A&D book if requested. Its a manual system.

It works perfectly. They can track a gun used in a crime, but its enough of a hassle so they can't go on fishing trips and they can't try to aggregate data and mine it or use it for statistics.
 
It works perfectly. They can track a gun used in a crime, but its enough of a hassle so they can't go on fishing trips and they can't try to aggregate data and mine it or use it for statistics.
Well, they do go on fishing trips and have been on one at least since Obama has been in office. They have been caught with their hands in the cookie jar multiple times collecting bound books (copies) from dealers for no reason at all.

It isn't a perfect system because there is no enforcement on the requirement that they not keep data and purge any data that they do get (from FFL's shutting or shut down for instance) that is not related to a crime.
 
I am in the process of running and finishing a group buy. When that is all finished and wrapped up, I will be working on this.
Keep me up to date. PM, if possible, as I'm not really online very much any more.

I don't want to undermine any current courses of action via GOAL or Comm2A, so if this can be written and preferably "blessed" by the aforementioned organizations, I'd be happy to pass it along to my rep as well. Durant is usually pretty reasonable, I've had several conversations with him over the past couple of years in which he recognizes and remembers me, and his staff has been responsive to me in the past.

Edit: I say I don't want to undermine because I had previously offered to make the old PDF FA-10 available, and was told that it was not the way to go, and not a good time for it. If there's something in the works to deal with this, depending on what "something" is, it might be best to let it play out.
 
Last edited:
Well, they do go on fishing trips and have been on one at least since Obama has been in office. They have been caught with their hands in the cookie jar multiple times collecting bound books (copies) from dealers for no reason at all.

It isn't a perfect system because there is no enforcement on the requirement that they not keep data and purge any data that they do get (from FFL's shutting or shut down for instance) that is not related to a crime.

fortunately southern and western members of congress do a decent job of oversight on this. For many of their constituents, this is a big issue.
You only need to go on youtube and watch some of the ads for southern and western elected office. Half of them have a gun in their hand while they are talking to the camera.
 
had another successful EFA-10 transaction today.. did it for a couple of friends.. works fine for me, had a little battle trying to punch in 3.5" for the barrel cause you can't use a decimal point, otherwise today was perfect... Yesterday had a hitch and couldn't get past the first page ,,, my wife gave me the wrong pin number.. once I got home and punched in the right pin.. it was bing bang and boom... that dam system is terrible.... what are they thinking.... making me use the correct pin... [rofl]
 
had another successful EFA-10 transaction today.. did it for a couple of friends.. works fine for me, had a little battle trying to punch in 3.5" for the barrel cause you can't use a decimal point, otherwise today was perfect... Yesterday had a hitch and couldn't get past the first page ,,, my wife gave me the wrong pin number.. once I got home and punched in the right pin.. it was bing bang and boom... that dam system is terrible.... what are they thinking.... making me use the correct pin... [rofl]

You seem to kindof be missing the whole point. Nobody is really saying that the eFA10 never works. The problems go more to the fact that firearms ownership is a right and the eFA10 is conditioning us to consider it to be more of a right. Its all been covered already. But here are a few things off the top of my head

1) if the systems down - you can't buy a gun.
2) facilitates computerization of records
3) you must do your transaction at a location with a computer and a printer. you can't do a transaction at a safe "neutral" location. like your gun club.
4) you are entering your info into a poorly architected web based app for it to be slung across the Internets.
5) you are making things easier for the people who are depriving us of our rights in the first place.

So the question is simply "Why?"

Don

p.s. doing my part, I picked up 3 from my local PD today.
 
I agree with most of what you say, except that this is 2012, it's not the wild west 1875. There is no getting around it, everyone has to go through the process one way or the other. if it is easier, less complicated and time consuming for me to do it online vs the manual paperwork, is my choice. I am not advocating eliminating the paper method, doing it online does not eliminate the paper. No matter what we do as a group or individually, this area is going to take it's course. That's the way I see it. I did not miss the point, just don't agree with the way some are going about it.

1) if the systems down - you can't buy a gun.

We have paperwork for that, not to mention that already happens in the federal program when buying through an FFL. Seems to me that occurred at the marlboro gun show last year..

2) facilitates computerization of records

It's already there and if it isn't it will be, I have no problem with that

3) you must do your transaction at a location with a computer and a printer. you can't do a transaction at a safe "neutral" location. like your gun club.

sure you can, paperwork is still available, and if someone has trouble getting paperwork, that is the fight that needs to be fought, not the EFA-10

4) you are entering your info into a poorly architected web based app for it to be slung across the Internets.

so what else is new, if it isn't up to standard, fight that fiight

5) you are making things easier for the people who are depriving us of our rights in the first place.

no, I am not, I have had no problem buying guns... again, one way or another the paperwork has to be done.
 
Last edited:
I agree with most of what you say, except that this is 2012, it's not the wild west 1875. There is no getting around it, everyone has to go through the process one way or the other.

No, they don't. There's no registration or transaction recording in nearly every other state, and that's just fine. There is zero legitimate reason to register transactions *at all*.


if it is easier, less complicated and time consuming for me to do it online vs the manual paperwork, is my choice.

I'm a computer geek, and work with computers all day, I even have a laptop with wireless and an iPad and even a printer at my house, so I'm comfortable using computers and the interweb for stuff, but I can't imagine it being easier to use any computer form than the paper one.


I am not advocating eliminating the paper method, doing it online does not eliminate the paper.

I don't understand how you can think that. The department responsible for printing and distributing the paper forms has said explicitly that they want us to use the electronic one and not the paper ones, and they've made it really difficult to get the paper ones. Every time you use the eFA10 it's one more data point they can use to eliminate paper ones entirely.


No matter what we do as a group or individually, this area is going to take it's course. That's the way I see it. I did not miss the point, just don't agree with the way some are going about it.

What do you think "it" is, or "this area"? That's a serious question. Do you not believe we have any power to resist? Do you think that owning a gun is a right, or a privilege? If you think it's a right, do you think it's reasonable for the state to make it difficult for you to exercise that right?


1) if the systems down - you can't buy a gun.

We have paperwork for that,

No, we don't. The state has been systematically eliminating availability of the paper forms. When you can't get paper forms, you can't legally buy or sell a gun.


not to mention that already happens in the federal program when buying through an FFL. Seems to me that occurred at the marlboro gun show last year..

We're not talking about FFLs, or any Federal regulation You don't have to tell the Feds *anything* when you buy or sell a gun privately. Also, FFLs are subject to different rules than we are.


2) facilitates computerization of records

It's already there and if it isn't it will be, I have no problem with that

You should. You're an idiot if you don't have a problem with it. Records like that are what makes governments think they can get away with confiscating guns. Pretty much every anti-gun advocate knows that you have to force registration before you can confiscate.


3) you must do your transaction at a location with a computer and a printer. you can't do a transaction at a safe "neutral" location. like your gun club.

sure you can, paperwork is still available, and if someone has trouble getting paperwork, that is the fight that needs to be fought, not the EFA-10

You really don't understand how this works. As more people use the eFA10, they print fewer and few paper forms, and make them more and more difficult. You seem ignorant of the fact that there are people involved, people who have an agenda. That agenda is "make everything as difficult as possible for gun owners"

The fact that you say, "still available" means you do, on some level, understand the problem; even if you're unwilling to admit it or say it out loud. You didn't say paper FA10s are "readily available", or "easily available", you said, "still available" Why is that? I challenge you to go down to your local PD and pick up a few paper FA10s. Take a picture of them in front of ... I dunno, a couple of your guns or something.


4) you are entering your info into a poorly architected web based app for it to be slung across the Internets.

so what else is new, if it isn't up to standard, fight that fiight

??!?!?! What do you think refusing to use the eFA10 is all about? That's *exactly* what we're suggesting!

5) you are making things easier for the people who are depriving us of our rights in the first place.

no, I am not, I have had no problem buying guns... again, one way or another the paperwork has to be done.

First of all, you're not having trouble buying guns *now*. But *RIGHT NOW* isn't the issue. The issue is that the state has systematically made it more and more difficult to legally sell or buy a gun. In the old days, (not even that long ago) even in MA you could just buy guns without paperwork. Now you're a felon if you sell more than 4 in a calendar year, you have to register each transaction with an increasingly cumbersome process, and if you screw *that* up, you're also a felon. Secondly, THE PAPERWORK DOES NOT NEED TO BE DONE. There is *zero* public safety reason for any of that crap. The only reason we have to do any paperwork *AT ALL*, is because the state wants to make it difficult for us to buy and sell guns.

When people like you say things like "it has to be done", that's what they want, they want us to get used to more and more restrictions, more and more hassle, so when it's impossible to sell or buy a gun in a private sale we say shit like, "what's the problem? Just go to a dealer for the transfer! I did two yesterday!"

You seem to believe that the state has our interests at heart. They don't; not even one tiny little bit. They violate their own rules to make it hard for us, the people running the systems DO NOT LIKE GUN OWNERS! They want to eliminate private gun ownership in MA. They are *not* good people doing their job the best they can.

Forget the fact that it's still possible, and look at the trend: everything they do is to make it more difficult for gun owners. They're not going to stop until we're all de-facto felons.
 
Ok, thanks for your OPINION of what I think... too bad most of what you said about my comments were expanded into something I didn't say.
 
Ok, thanks for your OPINION of what I think... too bad most of what you said about my comments were expanded into something I didn't say.

Everything *you* said was opinion. His post was an analysis in light of facts you omitted.

You are of course entitled to your opinions, just as we are entitled to our firearms.

It is the deliberate State harassment of gun owners that most of us object to ...

Sent from my chimney using smoke signals.
 
Everything *you* said was opinion. His post was an analysis in light of facts you omitted.

that's not a true statement

You are of course entitled to your opinions, just as we are entitled to our firearms.

absolutely

It is the deliberate State harassment of gun owners that most of us object to ...

as I whole hearted object to as well

Sent from my chimney using smoke signals.

Lots of opinions here, too bad those that are so verbal about whats wrong aren't doing much to fix it, cept post about others actions. I'm all in to support fixing what's wrong, just don't believe EFA-10's are the problem. You wanna fight the registering of guns, I'll fight it with you. But until then, whether I register online or with a piece of paper does not make a hill of beans difference, at the moment we have to register them somehow. If it matters that much to you all... get rid of your computors, cause that's the real problem....
 
I'm just doing my best to p*** off as many people as I possibly can on the subject.

The harder it hurts, the harder it is for the State to do this again ...

Sent from my chimney using smoke signals.
 
turbo38 - you seem to be missing one other point. The state's intent is to ELIMINATE the paper FA10. You keep referencing "you have the paper".

If the State was a customer focused corporation, I would agree that it would be in their best interest to provide paper and electronic means.
Even if the state was the state of FL, which is very pro gun.

If you call the FL DEP for a non-resident permit app, they will happily send you as many packets as you like in about 3 days. And they provide an electronic means to get the app.
For FL, its about convenience.

For MA its not about convenience. Once all the paper FA10 forms are gone, they have got us by the short curleys. Or so they think.
 
Back
Top Bottom