That would be my third optionLook for cover and lay down grazing fire
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
That would be my third optionLook for cover and lay down grazing fire
Short answer for me: Yes.
I can't run around making the argument that a good guy with a gun stops a bad guy with a gun, without planning on some level to approach it just like that if something bad happened. On or off duty. I can make up 100 scenarios where I probably wouldn't do anything because of how the incident was unfolding, but my default answer is 'try to stop the killing'. Then after that, try to stop the dying.
Sometimes, even minimal returned fire is enough to induce suicide or scare an attacker. They expect to be doing the shooting, not getting shot at.
You're the only one to address the elephant in the room. We all talk about good guys with guns and soft targets but the vast majority of the good guys appear to be headed to the exits at the first sign of trouble. Bra-freakin-vo, gents. Let those ladies and their children fend for themselves, so long as you and your's are safe. .
...hope you like the taste of cat food
So, i am supposed to feel sorry for the same people who are actively trying to take my guns away, invalidate the 2nd amendment, take away my high capacity magazines so i might have a chance against an active shooter???
The short answer is... Yes.
Also, I'd venture to say that the 30 second response time in Dayton is the exception, not the rule.
Not a clear cut yes. You could argue both ways.
Lets say you shot some perp, then his family sues you for wrongful death, and some loony massachusetts jury awards them a 5 million dollar payout...at your expense?
a police officer would be somewhat indemnified from such a lawsuit....but you or I...we would be on our own
So, i am supposed to feel sorry for the same people who are actively trying to take my guns away, invalidate the 2nd amendment, take away my high capacity magazines so i might have a chance against an active shooter???
Here in MA, we would be five to one more likely to have the people you saved want YOU to be arrested for taking "the law into your own hands".
i agree, if you can get the drop on the guy, get an honest three or so shots off before he knew what hit him...then that is a definitely different story. the odds are more in your favor, and there is also a risk of trying to run away out the back door of him seeing and shooting you, or an accomplice waiting at the back door for you unseen.
Here's my problem: I hear shooting and the ensuing screaming. I duck for cover, then I see the perp right in front of me shooting. I take him out only to find that I just killed the good guy with the gun who was shooting at the real perp.
well, i too do not believe in the "no win" scenarioOne must beat the Kobayashi Maru...
There is an excellent class at Mass Firearms in Holliston called "Judgmental Tactics". It is taught by Robert MacQuarrie (SWAT) from the Franklin Police Department. He advised students caught in an active shooter situation to keep a concealed handgun concealed (unless/until it is absolutely necessary to draw), because based on what he has seen as a law enforcement instructor there is a good chance that anybody holding a gun who isn't a cop is going to get shot by responding officers.
Link to class:
Judgmental Tactics | Firearms School near South Shore
The class uses shoot/no shoot video simulation and a laser-pistol, so you have to process information and make decisions in real time. The scenarios include muggings, kidnappings, carjackings, various robberies as both victim and as eyewitness, witness to deadly assaults. The experience is a real eye-opener for most people--it certainly was for me. Mass Firearms discounts the class 50% on their Black Friday sales. Well worth the effort to attend.
Just to stir the pot...
What floor is the child on? Can the child talk, old enough to follow commands? Are there others to help?Burning building,child hanging out of window,what do you do?
Again, communication is key. Direct someone to call 911. Salt water in the lungs is dangerous and warrants a drs care.Young woman caught in an apparent riptide,what do you do?
This one is different. Something with a thought process is attacking. I would do anything and everything I could.Elderly man being mauled by a large dog,what do you do?
My first thought was " Nah.. Imma grab the biggest wide screen in da sto. Use dat chit for cover and git my white trash ass outta there"
Then I thought, no, I have that Roland kids cell number.. I am gonna call his ass. " Hey Clover kid... it's fencer.. I am at the Walmart and some dude with a mini gun is tearing the place up! Come quick! No, I am not at the ammo case... I am at the plus sized lingerie..don't judge me. It's purely a comfort thing"
And then Stu comes tactical rolling into view.. and pew pew. Double taps the angry shooter in the forehead.
Truth is, I really would have a hard time watching innocent people get shot. And although I tell myself I wouldn't, have posted that I wouldn't and you shouldn't, I just would hate looking at myself in the mirror everyday if had to live with knowing I could have prevented a death.
As Dr. Grant says, it all depends on the circumstances.
There is a huge difference between running towards the sound of gunfire, and watching people getting shot right in front of you. And admittedly, I am sure all of us have some split second ranking system they would apply. Mother with three kids? Engage. Fat kid with a man bun and a Bernie Tshirt?
I think that all of us are smart enough to know we probably shouldn't, but even those that have posted " Nope, no way. Ain't happening", would have a hard time watching the local high school girls softball team be killed.
Let's hope none of us ever finds out what we would do.