seanc
NES Member
This is probably a stupid question.. but here it goes anyway.
Assuming this guy had a valid "FOR LIFE" fid.
Assuming all the guns (ammo/ mags/ etc) were purchased in state legally.
Assuming that the guns never left his residence when the FIDs "expired".
Doesn't the state have to prove that this guy was officially notified that they had essentially canceled his "for life" issued license?
Isn't this basically ex post facto law? Even in mass .
Under heller and all doesn't he have the right to keep arms, in his own home, never taking them out?
Assuming this guy had a valid "FOR LIFE" fid.
Assuming all the guns (ammo/ mags/ etc) were purchased in state legally.
Assuming that the guns never left his residence when the FIDs "expired".
Doesn't the state have to prove that this guy was officially notified that they had essentially canceled his "for life" issued license?
Isn't this basically ex post facto law? Even in mass .
Under heller and all doesn't he have the right to keep arms, in his own home, never taking them out?