• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Sheriff encourages citizens "to arm themselves and protect themselves" from home invaders

NHCraigT

NES Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
11,622
Likes
18,431
Location
Southern NH
Feedback: 2 / 0 / 0

During a press conference in April 2022, Santa Rosa County Sheriff Bob Johnson said, "If someone is breaking into your house, you're more than welcome to shoot. We prefer you to do that, actually."...

... "I said [at the press conference] if you shoot accurately, and you kill the guy, you save taxpayers money. And I also said that if somebody gets killed during a home invasion, the odds of them re-offending are zero. And we like those odds, which we do," he told Fox News Digital....

.... Since he made the remarks, he claims there has not been a single home invasion.
"And it's kind of ironic that, since that press conference, we haven't had any home invasions, and it's been over a year, so it's kind of odd," he said....

... "You don't have to retreat. You don't have to give them warning. You don't have to go barricade yourself in a room. You can shoot and kill them. And in the state of Florida, that's perfectly legal," he said. "And in these other states where they don't have that, people are afraid to own guns, and they're afraid to protect themselves. That's why you have the crime rate in New York, in California."...

"After my press conference, I was getting death threats by the hundreds every day. And, I had another interviewer ask me, ‘Are you worried about that?’ And I said, 'No, because all the death threats are coming from states where you can't buy a gun anyway, so I really don't care," he told Fox News Digital....
 
"After my press conference, I was getting death threats by the hundreds every day. And, I had another interviewer ask me, ‘Are you worried about that?’ And I said, 'No, because all the death threats are coming from states where you can't buy a gun anyway, so I really don't care," he told Fox News Digital....

And I agree with the sheriff 10,000 percent.

A strong castle doctrine is the key to public safety.

I don't have to wait for a home invader to gain entry into my home, The mere attempt to forcibly enter my home is sufficient legal reason to use deadly force to stop the invasion.

Kentucky Law.

503.055 Use of defensive force regarding dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle --Exceptions.(1) A person is presumed to have held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another when using defensive force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another if:

(a) The person against whom the defensive force was used was in the process of unlawfully and forcibly entering or had unlawfully and forcibly entered a dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle, or if that person had removed or was attempting to remove another against that person's will from the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle; and

(b) The person who uses defensive force knew or had reason to believe that an unlawful and forcible entry or unlawful and forcible act was occurring or had occurred.
(2) The presumption set forth in subsection (1) of this section does not apply if
a) The person against whom the defensive force is used has the right to be in or is a lawful resident of the dwelling, residence, or vehicle, such as an owner, lessee, or titleholder, and there is not an injunction for protection from domestic violence or a written pretrial supervision order of no contact against that person;
(b) The person sought to be removed is a child or grandchild, or is otherwise in the lawful custody or under the lawful guardianship of the person against whom the defensive force is used;

(c) The person who uses defensive force is engaged in an unlawful activity or is using the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle to further an unlawful activity; or(d) The person against whom the defensive force is used is a peace officer, as defined in KRS 446.010, who enters or attempts to enter a dwelling, residence, or vehicle in the performance of his or her official duties, and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law or the person using force knew or reasonably should have known that the person entering or attempting to enter was a peace officer.

(3) A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force, if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a felony involving the use of force.

(4) A person who unlawfully and by force enters or attempts to enter a person's dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle is presumed to be doing so with the intent to commit an unlawful act involving force or violence. Effective: July 12, 2006History: Created 2006 Ky. Acts ch. 192, sec. 2, effective July 12, 2006
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately, that didn’t work out too well for a certain airport executive from Arkansas.
That's because he was raided by a 20 man team of combat kitted up government agents. That kind of skews the odds against a guy being awakened from a sleep in his own bedroom at 0600 in complete darkness.....FOR A SEARCH WARRANT.....NOT an arrest warrant.
This was a deliberately conducted dramatic raid that could easily and legally been conducted without Malinowski's presence.

The ATF knew this and made the choice of maximum endangerment of all involved, including their own agents.
 
That's because he was raided by a 20 man team of combat kitted up government agents. That kind of skews the odds against a guy being awakened from a sleep in his own bedroom at 0600 in complete darkness.....FOR A SEARCH WARRANT.....NOT an arrest warrant.
This was a deliberately conducted dramatic raid that could easily and legally been conducted without Malinowski's presence.

The ATF knew this and made the choice of maximum endangerment of all involved, including their own agents.
I guess I should’ve added lol or /dark humor or something because I agree with everything you said.
 
Back
Top Bottom