Charlie Baker on 2A

I think everyone on this forum thinks that the gubernatorial candidates give a shit about 2a.
news flash: they don't.

Coakley thinks you are all evil.
baker is indifferent.
 
I think everyone on this forum thinks that the gubernatorial candidates give a shit about 2a.
news flash: they don't.

Coakley thinks you are all evil.
baker is indifferent.

Umm. No. They both suck on 2a issues. There is no vote here. This has been explained many times in this thread. If you are voting on 2a alone leave it blank and end up with Marsha.

If you are voting for multiple reasons like the economy, spending, union hackerism, etc. then we are better off with baker. Imho.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Umm. No. They both suck on 2a issues. There is no vote here. This has been explained many times in this thread. If you are voting on 2a alone leave it blank and end up with Marsha.

If you are voting for multiple reasons like the economy, spending, union hackerism, etc. then we are better off with baker. Imho.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think that is my point. If you only vote on 2a issues the differences are minimal. Although I would rate Marcia as evil.
point is not to be a single issue voter.
 
I want to thank all the NES members who came out to support my candidate. I want to thank all the NES members who actively supported other 2A Statewide candidates. I want to Thank Mike S and the GOAL BoD for supporting Pro 2a candidates.

If I could, I would thank the donors from NES.

And for the majority of NES members who could find time to ridicule on the internet; the process, or the candidates, but didn't do anything more than that, I say:

**** YOU

Yup as I said earlier in this thread. You said the 2A vote would not matter.



Baker, CharlieGOP539,76548%
Coakley, MarthaDem527,38747%
Falchuk, EvanUni36,4403%
Lively, ScottInd9,3491%
McCormick, JeffInd7,9111%


- - - Updated - - -

Plus

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Massachusetts - 1172 of 2173 Precincts Reporting - 54%[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]We just passed 50% and welcome to the world according to Martha.[/FONT]
 
59% now in....SMH

Coakley, MarthaDem578,07448%
Baker, CharlieGOP572,87547%
Falchuk, EvanUni39,0813%
Lively, ScottInd10,3531%
McCormick, JeffInd8,4831%
 
Coakley, MarthaDem642,95348%
Baker, CharlieGOP641,08448%
Falchuk, EvanUni44,1593%
Lively, ScottInd11,5781%
McCormick, JeffInd9,6221%
 
If it does end up being Coakley AND Healey then kiss what little remains of your rights away for a long, long time.
 
70%

We are screwed



Coakley, MarthaDem694,85248%
Baker, CharlieGOP685,32347%
Falchuk, EvanUni47,7853%
Lively, ScottInd12,7171%
McCormick, JeffInd10,4081%
 
So much for all of those polls that showed Baker up the past couple of weeks. I guess they didn't account for all of the illegals and dead people that made it to the polls.

This state is such a $#%*in' joke.
 
Coakley, MarthaDem754,34648%
Baker, CharlieGOP753,01248%
Falchuk, EvanUni52,2943%
Lively, ScottInd13,9711%
McCormick, JeffInd11,5511%
 
Back
Top Bottom