ranger4-7
Army Veteran
My father loves his AR-15, but I'm not sure you would want one in a bug-out scenario. Remember how back in the Vietnam War soldiers were having issues with the M-16 and keeping it clean?? What would happen is that the gun would need to be cleaned quite often and run "wet". When soldiers would drop them in the sand, mud, dirt, etc they would jam up. In a bug-out scenario, you may not have a proper cleaning kit or one at all. For this reason, I would have to go with an AK variant. They run in any and all situations and conditions. 30 rounds of 7.62x39mm is great in a self-defense scenario, and much like the AR-15's, you can carry several magazines containing hundreds of rounds. If time would allow me, I would also grab an AR-7 survival rifle, and a pump action shotgun (preferably a Benelli) Having a .22LR can be great for hunting small game, and so can a shotgun. You have to keep all these in mind, but I would grab an AK-47 Variant.
The initial issues with the M16 were less related to design flaws and more about the propellant that was used in the round. That coupled with messaging to the troops that rifle "never" needed to be cleaned, lead to the jamming issues. Once the propellant was changed and troops trained, the M16 assumed its role as one of the most effective, longest serving, most widely used man killers in the history of modern firearms. Take a look and see how many of the world’s elite military forces are NOT using an M16 variant.
The AK is a great rifle as well, but in a bug out scenario weight is going to be a major factor. So, I want the most number of bangs per pound. A loaded 30 round AK mag weighs almost twice as much as an AR mag (about 2 pounds vs. 1 pound).
Bottom line is that either would be a great choice. But perpetuating un-truths about the reliability of the AR platform is not necessary.
- Chris