If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
,Walsh is a political hack, who was already sanctioned for other issues when he was a rep. previously and they still re-elected him, What's that tell us, He''ll never sign anything that doesn't benefit him directly. Lea Cole made the right career move.Sucks cause Peabody had a pro2A rep but she quit to go back to full time nursing. Her Dem replacement will never sign this.
My rep and senator signed it. Still Baker is a bigger problem than them. He is a moderate D and is looking at the national stage IMHO.
Where's Rodrigues name, after his aide told me how much he agrees with me. I'll be calling back monday.
Looks like 58 signatures. Not too shabby.
My local state rep has a supposedly A rating from GOAL but his name is not on it. Maybe he needs to go then.
GOAL Rating | Candidate | Party | Incumbent |
D- | Maura Healey | D | Yes |
I see many Reps and Senators praising the AG on her twitter page and standing with her. I don't see any of the names on that letter posting to the contrary on the AG's twitter page....
Some of those signatures are from anti's too I believe.
I have a sneaking suspicion he's more upset at being usurped than the 2A issue... Perhaps when he's old enough to drink coffee, we can take invite him out for a cup and see where his head is at.
Curious, are some of these missing signatories possibly due to the fact they might not have been there yesterday? I'd hate to come down on them, when they weren't there to physically sign it.
Dear Legislators,
I wrote to you the other day regarding Attorney General Healey's illegal overreach and usurpation of power from you and your fellow legislators. I haven't heard back from any of you and I wanted to follow up and express my concern that I did not see your signatures on the letter sent to Ms Healey (see attached).
The letter was drafted and signed by 58 members on both sides of the aisle, some who do not even support the Second Amendment. To me that shows that they're willing to look past the "guns are bad" component and address the real issue of an executive illegally rewriting law on a whim. I would expect anyone who has sworn an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts would publicly condemn her breach of the separation of powers between the Executive and Legislative branches. While I understand firearm ownership might not be important to you, the Rule of Law should be. The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
I was at the rally yesterday in front of the State House with a few thousand fellow patriots-turned-felons where we listened to members of the State Senate and House of Representatives publicly condemn her actions. One of the slogans that should resonate with anyone and everyone was "If they can do this to us, they can do it to you". Unless the Ms Healey has found it within her powers to re-interpret Article IX of the Massachusetts Constitution, I'll be casting my vote this November, as I do every November, for candidates who support freedom and the Rule of Law.
Yours Truly,
ToddDubya
I continue to be very satisfied with my Representative in the state house.
View attachment 172969
Kind of disappointing to not see Pacheco's signature on there...especially considering he's rated A+ by GOAL.
Not happy that Paul Tucker didn't sign. As a former police chief he know damn well that these gun are not the issue.