bfm
NES Member
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
These are minimum standards for LEO "smart" guns, unrelated to civilian sales.
They thought of that too.So I can invent an RF disruptor that will lock the cops' guns? Smart thinking there.
the government identified intentional or unintentional “electromagnetic interference” as a possible threat, so the device must be equipped with a countermeasure. If it uses batteries, they can be re-chargeable but shall be replaceable. Lastly, if the device malfunctions, it should default to a state that allows the pistol to fire and be easy for the operator to reset or disengage.
The DOJ’s National Institute of Justice developed the specifications, which include recommendations for how smart guns should be able to be unlocked and a default state that would allow guns to fire if the technology malfunctioned, engadget reported.
If it can be hacked I'll pass thanks though. That and an emp renders them useless
not just counting failure-to-fire, what if it catches fire?
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/toys-r-us-pulls-tonka-truck-after-it-apparently-burst-n686441
Then why even bother?Note the inclusion of requirements that in the face of jamming or other failure, gun defaults to "fail hot":
Guidelines for purchases by Federal agencies, probably to defuse the argument "if smart guns are so great, how come LEO refuses to carry them?"Then why even bother?Note the inclusion of requirements that in the face of jamming or other failure, gun defaults to "fail hot":
Guidelines for purchases by Federal agencies, probably to defuse the argument "if smart guns are so great, how come LEO refuses to carry them?"
Don't worry the government will shut your gun off when it deems necessary. Anyone that thinks differently is fcking stupid.
Never, ever ever will I tolerate a smart gun in my house. We prefer simple tools.
Don't worry the government will shut your gun off when it deems necessary. Anyone that thinks differently is fcking stupid.
I don't see where the Armatix IP1 has a back door kill switch. Just because the option is covered in the patent filing doesn't mean it is implemented.The creator of the technology came right out and admitted to a back door kill switch.
If the issue were crackheads stealing guns and immediately going out and shooting up their dealer, they would have a point, but average "time-to-crime" on stolen and straw purchase guns is measured in years.Let me get this straight, if I buy a "smart gun" does that mean I will never commit a crime with it? So a "Smart gun" stops crime? Who makes this bullshit logic? I sincerely hope no gun manufacturer is even trying to develop such a thing. If one does I will never buy a thing they make, "smart gun" or not.
That would be only for government issued guns of course. Naturally they would want the government to be able to jam every legal civilian gun.so if the 'smart' gun can't contact the token/wristband/watch, it is 'malfunctioning, and should fail hot? What's the point of the tech then? Just use it without the token.
Disable? or enable?So, you say you want a smart gun? $15 worth of magnets can disable a $1,500 "smart"gun
https://www.wired.com/story/smart-gun-fire-magnets/