Here's my exchange with my rep. I live in Fitchburg. Stephen DiNatale. His initial response confused me as it looked like he was happy with the new bill, but he meant the way things already were, which is tough enough. MY ORIGINAL LETTER IS AT THE BOTTOM.
This last line was HIS last response to me as I offered to help in any way I can. I'm in dire straits financially but I can help people to write letters, etc.
Thank you Brian. I will keep that in mind. Regards Steve
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:
[email protected] [
[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 3:26 PM
To: DiNatale, Stephen - Rep. (HOU)
Subject: Re: RE: RE: Govenor Patrick's anti-gun bill
Yes Steve,
thanks, that does clarify your position and I am pleased. Feel free to let me know what I can do to help you should you need it regarding this bill.
Brian
Please don't breed or buy while homeless animals die.
On 01/18/13, DiNatale, Stephen - Rep. (HOU)<
[email protected]> wrote:
Brian I may not have been clear I stated that I believe the Commonwealth has reached that balance with EXISTING LAWS, I do not wish to add to what is currently on the books. Again I do not I repeat do not agree with the Govenor's proposal. Hope this clarifies my position. Best wishes Steve
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:
[email protected] [
[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 2:12 PM
To: DiNatale, Stephen - Rep. (HOU)
Subject: Re: RE: Govenor Patrick's anti-gun bill
Hi Steve,
I respectfully disagree on the point of limiting magazines to 7 rds. when everything was fine at 10.
And you are also OK with forcting us to buy liability insurance to own something already rightfully guaranteed to us by the 2nd Amendment?
I'm willing to bet that if you look at the demographic, most if not all licensed citizens, are working, tax paying people who are getting crushed just to survive in this state. Never mind having a hobby or trying to protect yourself.
I also don't agree with one gun per month limitations to purchase.
I'm sorry you feel this way.
Brian
Please don't breed or buy while homeless animals die.
On 01/18/13, DiNatale, Stephen - Rep. (HOU)<
[email protected]> wrote:
Mr. Lawrence thank you for taking the time to contact me. You are a Fitchburg resident and as such I am your representative. I don't wish to belabor the point so I will be very brief, I too have concerns with the Govenor's proposal. I believe the Commonwealth has struck the proper balance between public safety and the rights of law abiding citizens. Best wishes Steve
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Brian Lawrence [
[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 8:07 PM
To: DiNatale, Stephen - Rep. (HOU)
Subject: Govenor Patrick's anti-gun bill
Hi Stephen,
I’m one of your many lawfully licensed constituents here in Fitchburg who is asking you to NOT support some of sections of the Govenor’s anti-gun bill.
In particular, the 7 rd limit on magazines vs. 10 which President Obama is OK with! And we are already doing that anyway.! Also one gun a month???? You’re just hurting industry / jobs and US!
And also to have to buy insurance for using my 2nd Amendment rights?
I am a law abiding, voting, tax paying citizen and I find it ridiculous that AGAIN the lawful licensed permit holders are under attack.
We in Massachusetts have already BEEN abiding by a magazine capacity ban for many years. Enough is enough.
Because some insane kid commits murder, everyone must be punished?
I see Massachusetts years ago, bragging about the toughest gun laws in the Country with a mandatory year in jail if you’re caught unlicensed with one, yet NO ONE EVER GOES TO JAIL. I know, my brother has served as Law Enforcement for over FORTY YEARS in Fitchburg and I think he saw ONE guy go to jail.
I’ve seen the blotter for our town and people are caught with guns and released on right after they’re cited?????? Most never do time.
The offender should be arraigned in court after capture and if found guilty, go directly to jail for the one year AT LEAST for a first time offender. Not go home!
I’m ok with background checks of course, etc. And keeping guns out of the hands of those that shouldn’t touch them in particular to mental health problems. I’m also disappointed no one ever focused on the fact that Adam Lanza was taking a controversial and powerful anti-psychotic drug for mental illness that had been know to not only be ineffective, but to actually exacerbate the very problems / symptoms it was supposed to treat? Ie; Aggression, tantrums, etc.?
The licensed gun owners are your biggest advocates for enforcing the already tough laws that are never utilized to appropriate offenders. WE SUPPORT YOU!
Would you also be kind enough to provide me with EVERYONE else ( REPS ) that cover my district that I can write or call regarding this very important matter?
Thank you,