Sorry, open transport is clearly illegal, I just looked it up
Open transport is illegal, MAGL malegislature.gov
(That's about booze. Handguns are fine. Long guns are not.)
another completely unjust law
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Sorry, open transport is clearly illegal, I just looked it up
Open transport is illegal, MAGL malegislature.gov
(That's about booze. Handguns are fine. Long guns are not.)
I try searching the forums for my answers but sometimes you can't muddle through it all.
I'm always up for a good open carry debate as evidently there are still many who think it is illegal
If you enjoy reading the same rehashed crap over and over again, by all means, go for it.
By the OP's own admission, after using the search function, he received so much info that he couldn't even get through it all. What could possibly be added at this point?
Where's the joy in that?Look professional and no one will even notice. They will feel safe around you.
What?I personally luv the advantages of concealed carry. I don’t need to walk around with my piece showing everyone. I will say though I luv crossing the border up north and putting on my FDE FNX tactical for everyone to see..lol.
I personally luv the advantages of concealed carry. I don’t need to walk around with my piece showing everyone. I will say though I luv crossing the border up north and putting on my FDE FNX tactical for everyone to see..lol.
The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari<Piero Piccioni - Traffic Boom; w. scene from "The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari.">
The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari
P. S. I might have made that last part up.
Precisely. And u my friend have Sarcasm nailed...What?
So you love hiding it and not showing it, but you love showing it?
Did he ask you to touch his monkey?One of his co-workers was a guy, who looked like Deiter. And danced like him, too.
Firearms Record Bureau v. SimkinSince this thread has been posted didn't we have a court victory that was something to the effect of a firearms owner does not have the responsibility to the panic caused by the presence of a firearm? I.E. If some whack job catches a peek of your fo'tay while you're bending over to lift a box of clays into your carriage at Cabelas and freaks the f*** out to a point where police are called you're not responsible for the ensuing panic?