I'm pretty sure he was a Vietnamese NLF assassin.And the person hes shooting is a north korean soldier dressed in civilian clothing during war time.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
I'm pretty sure he was a Vietnamese NLF assassin.And the person hes shooting is a north korean soldier dressed in civilian clothing during war time.
If one side starts killing politicians then the other side does the same. Then we have a civil war. Remember how our last civil war went? The estimates for the number of dead range from 600k to almost 900k, with hundreds of thousands more wounded. This was at a time when the US population was 31M, so 1/10th of our current population. More soldiers died during the US civil war than in all of our wars since then combined.'if you kill your enemies they win'
Lol bro. Im sure voting will fix this.
If one side starts killing politicians then the other side does the same. Then we have a civil war. Remember how our last civil war went? The estimates for the number of dead range from 600k to almost 900k, with hundreds of thousands more wounded. This was at a time when the US population was 31M, so 1/10th of our current population. More soldiers died during the US civil war than in all of our wars since then combined.
Yeah, that’s a great plan.
And the person hes shooting is a north korean soldier dressed in civilian clothing during war time.
OK. So what are you waiting for? Why haven’t you shot politicians that you think are commies?I'm blown away that you think it's possible to fight a commie government with voting and democratic process.
Also, the only sides are party members vs The People. Left vs Right is just The Big Lie. If all the politicians were slaughtered on both sides, I would call that a good start.
If one side starts killing politicians then the other side does the same. Then we have a civil war. Remember how our last civil war went? The estimates for the number of dead range from 600k to almost 900k, with hundreds of thousands more wounded. This was at a time when the US population was 31M, so 1/10th of our current population. More soldiers died during the US civil war than in all of our wars since then combined.
Yeah, that’s a great plan.
View attachment 796070
We most definitely WILL become Beirut AND Sarajevo, X1000. Nobody is expecting to rise as "kings", but you can rest assured there's going to be a lot of scores settled at the most animalistic level and 90% of it will be fully justified.
You can have my turn banging that squaw thank you very much.f*** her too, thats all.
OK. So what are you waiting for? Why haven’t you shot politicians that you think are commies?
Furthermore, if it becomes open season on politicians, the killings won’t end there. It will be open season on ANYONE. Welcome to the North American version of Somalia.
The dustup of the 1860s was NOT a civil war, it was a thwarted independence.View attachment 796070
We most definitely WILL become Beirut AND Sarajevo, X1000. Nobody is expecting to rise as "kings", but you can rest assured there's going to be a lot of scores settled at the most animalistic level and 90% of it will be fully justified.
90% of the people doing the killing on both sides will believe they are justified. 90% of the victims will believe it was not justified. Most of the population will just want the horror to stop.View attachment 796070
We most definitely WILL become Beirut AND Sarajevo, X1000. Nobody is expecting to rise as "kings", but you can rest assured there's going to be a lot of scores settled at the most animalistic level and 90% of it will be fully justified.
90% of the people doing the killing on both sides will believe they are justified. 90% of the victims will believe it was not justified. Most of the population will just want the horror to stop.
So you think Civil War 2 will somehow be civilized? That only the “correct” people will be killed?Ahhh yes. The false choice. Either i tolerate communism or were somalia.
Nice.
The Russo-Ukraine war isn’t a civil war. It was an invasion by Russia. Two different things.Now tell me about your support of Ukraine in the context of the above statement.
Correct. And it will escalate - maybe slowly then quickly, maybe just quickly. Eventually food/water/electricity for the cities will be attacked, and that's when Quickly.Civil War has already started. People are already being killed in cities over beliefs. It will spill over and spread. The issue right now is only one side is fighting because the conservatives like those in this thread dont understand the war has already started
theres just not a lot of shooting because conservatives are rolling over and capitulating. Lawlessness already exists with protestors and politicians being arrested and jailed for false charges.
You guys arguing about a civil war starting in the future need to wake up. As an example
the civil war that lead to the creation of this country started years before 1776.
Incorrect. A substantial portion of Ukraine's population is ethnically Russian. "Ethnically" matters TONS in a goodly chunk of the world, including there.The Russo-Ukraine war isn’t a civil war. It was an invasion by Russia. Two different things.
The Russo-Ukraine war isn’t a civil war. It was an invasion by Russia. Two different things.
What I wrote was indeed correct. The Russo Ukrainian war is not a Civil War. It is not one state fighting again itself. It is one state, Russia, invading an independent state, Ukraine.Incorrect. A substantial portion of Ukraine's population is ethnically Russian. "Ethnically" matters TONS in a goodly chunk of the world, including there.
It's a LOT more complex than a mere invasion. And as will be the case with our coming civil war, there are (and have been) outside influences, as well - the role of the United States is not insubstantial, for example.What I wrote was indeed correct. The Russo Ukrainian war is not a Civil War. It is not one state fighting again itself. It is one state, Russia, invading an independent state, Ukraine.
Yes, a substantial portion are native Russian speakers. But the vast major the Ukrainian citizens, including those who are ethnic Russians, don’t support the Russian invasion.
But the 90% being killed is OK because you support it, amiright?
On the US side, the war has started. Behave and prepare accordingly because black swans shift Overton windows very fast in these types of environments.
I agree. This is on the same tier for me as the sovereign citizens tropes.Governor Lujan Grisham says her duty to uphold her oath to the constitution is "not absolute"
Really? REALLY? It is the MOST ABSOLUTE DUTY REQUIRED OF YOU TO HOLD YOUR OFFICE!!!!
Where on earth do these people get these complete bullshit notions from?
If a sworn oath has no absolute duty to be upheld, then the entirety of government and governance means nothing and there is no authority connected to the office.
These people like Grisham who adopt such a mindset are insane and unfit to be in any position of power or authority over anyone.
The IDEAL case is a divorce - preferably of the velvet variety. That won't happen: the Establishment won't let it.There is NOT going to be a civil war like Syria. What may happen is another succession. The Democrats take a super majority in the federal government. Then begin imposing their policies on everyone. A group of states say they've had enough and the next thing you know America is split in 2 or 3 different nations. To me this seems far more plausible yet still a long way off.
I say Democrats BTW not because I vote Republican but because they're the ones who could pull it off. Maneuvers like making DC and PR states, SCOTUS packing, mail in voting, eliminating the Electoral College and of course voter base importation. These are all things they've advocated for. I'm sure the Republican party would pull it off if they could but they can't. Most of the losers in the Republican party are probably just controlled opposition at this point anyway.
Governor Lujan Grisham says her duty to uphold her oath to the constitution is "not absolute"
Really? REALLY? It is the MOST ABSOLUTE DUTY REQUIRED OF YOU TO HOLD YOUR OFFICE!!!!
Where on earth do these people get these complete bullshit notions from?
If a sworn oath has no absolute duty to be upheld, then the entirety of government and governance means nothing and there is no authority connected to the office.
These people like Grisham who adopt such a mindset are insane and unfit to be in any position of power or authority over anyone.
Those who have the guns winWhat goes around comes around. If we allow extra-judicial killings of people who violate the constitution in this way, then we would also have extrajudicial killings of people who entered the Capital Building on Jan 6th — because whoever is in charge would defend their extrajudicial killings.
I despise what the NM Governor has done (and I despise her as well). But extrajudicial killing never ends well.
It's usually what happens when all other remedies to tyranny have run their course and failed.What goes around comes around. If we allow extra-judicial killings of people who violate the constitution in this way, then we would also have extrajudicial killings of people who entered the Capital Building on Jan 6th — because whoever is in charge would defend their extrajudicial killings.
I despise what the NM Governor has done (and I despise her as well). But extrajudicial killing never ends well.
“Combined”?…..that’s kinda a loose stat, no?..If one side starts killing politicians then the other side does the same. Then we have a civil war. Remember how our last civil war went? The estimates for the number of dead range from 600k to almost 900k, with hundreds of thousands more wounded. This was at a time when the US population was 31M, so 1/10th of our current population. More soldiers died during the US civil war than in all of our wars since then combined.
Yeah, that’s a great plan.