I might do that, thanks for the tip. And thanks for the confirmation on what I can and can't do.
Two last questions. I am under the impression that in Mass an FID is shall issue whereas an LTC is may issue. First, is that correct? And Second, assuming that it is correct, does it make any sense to apply for both so as to ensure that 60 days out I am not sitting in possession of a number of Firearms that I am not legally allowed to have if my LTC gets rejected? There is no valid reason for my LTC to get rejected, but I tend to be cautious by nature and always like to have a backup plan.
Thanks again.
As of 1/1/15, FID is now discretionary too . . . they do have an extra hoop to jump thru before they deny however, but most of us who track this stuff believe that the MA marsupial judges will go along with any chief who can articulate any "suitability" reason.
FID will not allow you to possess (legally) ANY ARs, handguns, large cap mags (pre-ban of course) or any large cap long guns. IMNSHO it is totally useless to possess unless one is <21 yo (min age for LTC).
Next, the criteria for issuance of a LTC is the same as for an FID nowadays, so no advantage to spending twice the money for no benefit.
Nobody will prosecute someone for >60 days if they got all their paperwork into the PD prior to the 60 days. Any delay at that point is because of a PD dragging their feet and even a MA marsupial judge is not going to look kindly at that sort of "sting" operation!
Finally, even the worst town in MA (and Harvard having the best club in MA in the town is hardly a bad town for LTCs) does NOT deny applicants "just because the law says they can". Even the worst towns will issue a LTC, but they do it with restrictions so that you can't carry but you certainly can own any conventional gun. If you have absolutely no record, please stop worrying and just move forward.