If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
All you statists complaining about this guy. Baiting a response by committing no crime is not grounds for disowning this guy as a gun owner. If you don't agree with him, hold your tongue.
Sounds simple enough.
Yeah, well, about that... You don't have the right to free speach here. It's a private website, and the admin and mods lay down the rules.Or use my 1st amendment right to free speech?
All you statists complaining about this guy. Baiting a response by committing no crime is not grounds for disowning this guy as a gun owner. If you don't agree with him, hold your tongue.
Sounds simple enough.
Yeah, well, about that... You don't have the right to free speach here. It's a private website, and the admin and mods lay down the rules.
The only thing wrong with this is that they are at the low ready.
You do realize this is Vancouver WA, not Canada, right? 2A still applies within the boundaries of the US. These aren't Canadian mounties, but city of Vancouver WA PD.That dude actually thought, for real, that the city of Vancouver would be gun-friendly?
Meh. Fat(er) guy isn't low ready. Not at all. Other guy is more like low retard.The only thing wrong with this is that they are at the low ready.
Fatboy's hand is away from the trigger, I'd label him threat number two.nhpoke
Would you consider walking around in public with a handgun at low ready to be brandishing? Or any worse than holding a rifle at low ready?
nhpoke
Would you consider walking around in public with a handgun at low ready to be brandishing? Or any worse than holding a rifle at low ready?
nhpoke
Would you consider walking around in public with a handgun at low ready to be brandishing? Or any worse than holding a rifle at low ready?
That doesn't change his rights, but it sure doesn't help our cause.
Why oh WHY…..does it have to be MEXICANS????And no one here is advocating going around shooting guns in the air like a bunch of Mexican banditos until people get used to it. Legally OCing is no threat to anyone else.
Actually, trespassing was the only real charge there, when he walked into the parking lot you could hear the cop say "they don't want you here," the displaying of a fire arm in a threatening manner??? I seriously question that, by unloading his rifle and magazine on the ground, the cops made the the guy reload his magazine and the rifle in front of them, I tried to figure out if he pulled the charging handle but i couldn't tell with all the shite going on in the video. maybe thats how they got that charge on him.(ignoring the entire video except the very end) how is that not entrapment? Guy tries to leave and go home, he is told to stop and turn around. Tries to walk another way and speak to an Officer, told to walk away. Faces back in the direction he has to go home, again trying to speak to a public servant....annnd then he's arrested. Undoubtedly they arrested him for "tresspassing" as that's the only conceivable charge the JBTs could have fabricated if they did not deem arrest was appropriate after the initial contact. That ending had my blood boiling. I hope this guy has a fat lawsuit coming his way
Trespass is not in itself criminal.
For it to be criminal, the property needs to be posted, or you need to have been told to leave by the person controlling the property, either the owner or the person who rents from the owner. A police officer can not lawfully tell you to get off private property unless he is acting under the direction of the person who controls the property.