-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
-
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Milford father, son face gun, ammo charges
- Thread starter Rick Roma
- Start date
No different than SWAT-ing via phone or internet. Miley Cyrus, Justin Beiber, Ashton Kutcher... even the rich and famous get their homes searched for hours when a 12 year old kid decides to play a prank and call the cops saying there's a man with a gun in the house.
http://ktla.com/2012/12/18/arrest-made-in-series-of-celebrity-swatting-cases/
That's ok, just continue to support those who are obviously out to get people who just want to exercise their 2nd amendment rights.
s4mt3k
NES Member
How were they charged with Possession of a large cap weapon if it says they had LTCs? Because it had features in violation of MA AWB?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
George D
NES Member
I think that would be why. I think we can all agree that news reporters know jack about firearms. If the AR is post ban in a pre-ban configuration, they probably grabbed it and couldn't find a specific law to cite.
wow dude![[rolleyes]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/042.gif "Roll Eyes [rolleyes]")
Many would agree that people who are actively against the natural right to bear arms should be outed, humiliated, and fired from public service. Why would you post the picture if you didn't want people to know that a cop inappropriately posted pictures related to a case?
Mass-diver
NES Member
Glad to see it was p-mags.
Any law banning standard capacity magazines (robbing the citizen of the ability to defend himself in his own home) is unconstitutional. The AR 15 is one of most common use weapons in the US, crippling the weapon by banning the magazine it was designed to use (and chooing a completely arbitrary "acceptable" capacity) is beyond absurd. Hopefully this wil be a nice test case.
Any law banning standard capacity magazines (robbing the citizen of the ability to defend himself in his own home) is unconstitutional. The AR 15 is one of most common use weapons in the US, crippling the weapon by banning the magazine it was designed to use (and chooing a completely arbitrary "acceptable" capacity) is beyond absurd. Hopefully this wil be a nice test case.
flintoid
Banned
I don't see what's wrong with "outing" the LEO:
1. He posted that to brag about how he almost "got killed by a big scary gun!"
2. He posted evidence to an impeding trial
3. He is a dipshit for putting evidence on a public profile
4. He is a attention whore trying to impress his lady friends about how tough he is apprehending citizens who commit non-violent crimes.
F that guy. I'd love to see his FB profile so I could harass his big, tough ass.
1. He posted that to brag about how he almost "got killed by a big scary gun!"
2. He posted evidence to an impeding trial
3. He is a dipshit for putting evidence on a public profile
4. He is a attention whore trying to impress his lady friends about how tough he is apprehending citizens who commit non-violent crimes.
F that guy. I'd love to see his FB profile so I could harass his big, tough ass.
Understood. I do feel that it also shows that the picture was arranged to hit all the "omg a weapons cache!" buttons of the antis.
Mass-diver
NES Member
+1. Buy what you want, **** the nonsense.
Yup, I see nothing wrong with posting a picture that was already leaked. With that picture out there, it will most likely save these poor guys from any legal trouble.
flintoid
Banned
still doesn't make this LEO any less of a douchebag.
He was posting bullshit on his facebook profile thinking that it'd make panties wet. By doing this he is propagating that AR-15's and 30 round mags are "scary and evil." This was his intent- to display them in such a way so that he could get some girl on the other side of the internet to bat her eye lashes and get moist over how this big badass LEO just avoided the brink of death and that she would spread eagle for him this Friday night after he douches out in front of her at the local bar.
This LEO is a nutsack. And he's further propagating the notion/idea that AR's are something that the everyday citizen should fear. I hope he gets AIDS from the skank he "impressed."
+1..
NEVER TALK TO THE POLICE! They are not interrogating errr..... "interviewing" you to help you establish your innocence. Always invoke your 5th amendment rights. Don't talk unless you have an attorney present. I know you're innocent and just want to espouse your honorable intentions. Remember - anything you say CAN and WILL be used against you. Even innocent mistakes in your conversation/recollection can have a disastrous impact on your future freedom! Many an innocent man sit in jail right now because they spoke to the police when they should have taken the 5th and called a lawyer...
God bless the 5th amendment.
SteelShooter
NES Member
The Channel 7 news at 4 just had a [STRIKE=----]clip[/STRIKE] magazineon this. The video showed the police displaying the evidence for the 7 news camera.
FIFY
Infinite Jester
Navy Veteran
Is the 5th one of the ones we have left? I get confused sometimes which ones we have and which ones they ignore.
And another point, at no time will anything you said in the interview be used FOR your defense. There's some pretty interesting stories of police recording the interview, taking notes off the recording and then wiping the recording. Nothing you say without a lawyer will help you.
SteelShooter
NES Member
I think we should all be on guard for more of these types of things happening and keep each other informed when they do. Not that it is a conspiracy but just the sheeple are becoming more skeered at the evil black killy things and may feel more emboldened to make a phone call. Depending on what city you are in it could be a big deal.
Ammo meant to be fed into high cap killy assault weapons, also known as Martha's nightmare.
Maybe it's a round of ammunition that takes 10+ high capacity clips to hold it.
Or is it a round of ammunition with the shoulder thing that goes up?
my guess is the Milford news omitted the wife because they consider her "the victim". the news paper sees it as black and white: bad guy(s) and victim. Victims have rights and ethical considerations and the bad guy gets tarred, feather, and put in the stocks (mug shot online in minutes).
Your LE friend should know not to mix business and pleasure. Whatever phone and computer he used to post that photo is now part of the investigation. The defense needs to inform the DA of the situation and the DA should confiscate it all because it's evidence that was collected and needs to be disclosed. No kidding.
Similar threads
