They don't need to be in a safe if they have a trigger lock.
I know, he was just saying once they come in and 'open the safe'...my point was why would you do that unless they had a warrant to search.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
They don't need to be in a safe if they have a trigger lock.
There has to be more to this story, ATF, FBI and DHS??? If not, what a joke, all that for mags and an unsecured firearm....
Look at the indented channel on the right side of the longer AR magazines. Those look to me like 10 round magazines.
They look like 10 round Pro-Mag's. These cops may of screwed up if the AK mags are pre ban. God, if this is what sends you to jail, we NES folks are all criminals in this state...
If he didn't have a LTC-A, pre-ban vs post-ban is not relevant. You need a LTC-A to possess any high-capacity firearm.
I haven't seen anything but what I've read here, but....
If he didn't have a LTC-A, pre-ban vs post-ban is not relevant. You need a LTC-A to possess any high-capacity firearm.
The reality of this case it that it's a Fourth Amendment case, and not a Second Amendment case. If the tip came from someone who knows the difference between a ten round magazine and a thirty round magazine, and the information is otherwise deemed reliable, and all he's got is a LTC-B, he's screwed.
He apparently wasn't charged with possession of a large capacity firearm, so we can assume that he either had an LTC-A or whoever charged him didn't know about that law.
Class B can possess large capacity rifles and shotguns.
Yes, I always forget that. He could have had a B, which would make the rifles legal but the mags illegal. Methuen is pretty green though, I haven't heard of anyone getting B-rammed there.
Kenneth L?I left some. Reps to the one that figures out which are mine. lol
You can have the mag as well no? Just not for handguns I thought.
A Class B license shall entitle a holder thereof to purchase, rent, lease, borrow, possess and carry:
[SNIP]
rifles and shotguns, including large capacity rifles and shotguns, and feeding devices and ammunition therefor, for all lawful purposes; provided, however, that the licensing authority may impose such restrictions relative to the possession, use or carrying of large capacity rifles and shotguns as he deems proper.
Hmm, unclear. Chapter 140, Section 131 says:
It doesn't specify "large capacity feeding devices" by name, and those are defined specifically in section 121 and treated separately in other parts of the MGLs. I don't know.
By the time anyone who knows [STRIKE=undefined]their shit[/STRIKE] mags sees them, they'll be post-ban.
I just wonder how the Police were able to identify Pre from Post-Ban AK or AR magazines. I would wager that this charge will get dropped.
Per the post he was popped for having an unsecured firearm and 2 illegal mags.
Per the picture he had 4 'hi caps' - 2 30 round AK and 2 20 round AR. If he only got hit with 2 counts than he didn't have a B, he had an A. Looking at the pics I'm guessing 2 of them were doubtful.
The 2 "20 round" AR mags are really 10 rounders.
You can tell by the partial ridge. I have a few of those and they are soid mags.
The LGS sells them by the case. The issue has to be either his licensing level (A vs B)
Mag misidentification or a misinterpretation of the law. Or a combination of the above.
Or more likely they got a "tip", checked him out in the ATF, FBI and DHS databases, showed up at his house, couldn't find anything seriously wrong and then made stuff up in order to charge the guy. Can't wait to see if there was a lawful search warrant here. I am sh**ting in the MPD Facebook thread because I don't live in MA anymore and I have nothing at risk by criticizing them. Their post was inflammatory and sensationalist. It should have a picture of two magazines and a revolver. It should use the term "alleged" in a lot of places. They can't charge him with unlawful possession of everything else based on them yanking his permit for the two other alleged violations. If he had a Class B those rifles are verboten if I remember right...and wouldn't they have stated that in their list of charges?
If there were agents from those federal agencies at the bust...why? No federal laws were broken by all appearances. This is great police work! (he says sarcastically)