He should reach out to Judicial Watch for assistance. They certainly know their way around a lawsuit to compel compliance with a FOIA request. I believe they have a resource in Massachusetts.
-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
-
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Maura Healey refuses to disclose
- Thread starter jefsemperfi
- Start date
He should reach out to Judicial Watch for assistance. They certainly know their way around a lawsuit to compel compliance with a FOIA request. I believe they have a resource in Massachusetts.
Glockster30
NES Member
Got your point, but why should we respect a dictator?
kevin9
NES Member
The fact that the AGO released post-July20th correspondence indicates that the deliberative process is over, therefore pre-July 20th materials are no longer exempt. I hope the requester gets this into court, and finds a judge who's had a bad experience with Healey. We all have our dreams.
It's reasonable to assume the NSSF and other legal groups filed similar requests for this and anything else of interest in Healey's career. Hell, the lawyers are probably looking in places we'd never think or even dream of researching or requesting information from.
MisterHappy
NES Member
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2009
- Messages
- 28,479
- Likes
- 17,708
Because, then you can craft your opposition intelligently. It's the old Sun Tzu thing about knowing your enemy, and yourself.
Why do you think her move was a surprise? Because, the last Anti move (i.e. Linsky et al) was opposed, and mostly defeated. Get there firstest with the mostest, and don't let then know you're comin'.
Yep. It is just a stop gap measure. Like sticking your fist in the dyke.
They keep ignoring that 3 hours passed before the police went in and only focus on the gun used. The body count most likely wouldn't have been any where near what it was if the response had been quicker. Also they'll probably do like hillary and holder did. They'll submit information that has been highly redacted and or claim that the information is missing etc.
"“After Orlando I was asked by many members of the media, ‘could this weapon be purchased here in Massachusetts?’” Healey said earlier this month during an appearance on Boston Public Radio. “So I asked the team to look into it."
"“After Orlando I was asked by many members of the media, ‘could this weapon be purchased here in Massachusetts?’” Healey said earlier this month during an appearance on Boston Public Radio. “So I asked the team to look into it."
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2013
- Messages
- 565
- Likes
- 76
hillman
NES Member
Dude...
TheGreekFreak
NES Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2015
- Messages
- 2,489
- Likes
- 3,471
She can't release what doesn't exist. We all like to think that she planned this a while ago all on her own but I'd be suprised if that was true. Plus, she would have done this much earlier if she had a clue. Unfortunately, she isn't the only one to blame. The clueless public is an equal obstacle.
I bet this came about by massive amounts of emails to her office after some mass shooting, maybe Orlando, maybe something earlier. A group of hippies probably discovered the MA compliant stuff after a stealthy operation in an evil gun store as they hunted for material for their next #DisarmHate common sense gun control rally. Clueless Maura then asked her paper pushers to look into it and was told that the MA compliant stuff was real. Instantly, she sharted as she thought the AWB got rid of all the machine guns. She then came out and pretended how all this was brought about by her actually caring about the mass shootings around the nation. Add in the political timing for this to go down and directive complete.
If I was a betting man, that's how I think it went down. Hillary running and the timing was just the push she needed but no way she researched and came up with the idea on her own.
I bet this came about by massive amounts of emails to her office after some mass shooting, maybe Orlando, maybe something earlier. A group of hippies probably discovered the MA compliant stuff after a stealthy operation in an evil gun store as they hunted for material for their next #DisarmHate common sense gun control rally. Clueless Maura then asked her paper pushers to look into it and was told that the MA compliant stuff was real. Instantly, she sharted as she thought the AWB got rid of all the machine guns. She then came out and pretended how all this was brought about by her actually caring about the mass shootings around the nation. Add in the political timing for this to go down and directive complete.
If I was a betting man, that's how I think it went down. Hillary running and the timing was just the push she needed but no way she researched and came up with the idea on her own.
Individualist
NES Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2009
- Messages
- 4,663
- Likes
- 4,366
TheGreekFreak
NES Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2015
- Messages
- 2,489
- Likes
- 3,471
LOL sure there is and fine, we should be able to see them, whatever. Still, if you think that papertrail will show that this all began with her, I think you'll be suprised.
Just like we call/email our reps about fighting stupid gun laws, there are others on the opposite side who are equally passionate about calling their reps to fight against us. Assuming Maura figured this all out, put together meetings, and accomplished what she did all on her own is giving her too much credit. She's not that smart. She was tipped off about something she had no clue about and timed her response just right to gain favor from her base, simple as that.
We can dislike her all we want but she only exists because of the morons around us. The more important issue is how we move forward.
hbar26
NES Member
Exactly, there has to be some emails related to this, she would have wanted her underlings informed, of either a meeting to discuss it or what she wanted researched.
Individualist
NES Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2009
- Messages
- 4,663
- Likes
- 4,366
Private server?
This
Shocked. Shocked i tells ya!
Don't know him personally but he's in a few pro 2A facebook groups I am a part of and shared what he received as a "response" a few weeks ago. Couldn't help but think what a BS response this was when I read through the documents. Absolutely nothing showing who and what was discussed while she decided to change her "interpretation".
she went down to DC in may to talk "gun violence" back in May, she was also a speaker at some GC event, (someone posted the picture of the speaking agenda here, but I'm too lazy to find it.) Her name was in print under the headline "Taking Action"
this has been in the works for a while.
Asaltweapon
NES Member
That could take a lot longer than expected. I believe the FOIA has a time period. No? Trust me. I'd love to see any and all of the responsible parties with their balls or flaps stapled to the walls over this.
goodzilla
NES Member
this was a political action and I believe the rebukes need to be political in fashion. she should be made to look like incompetent and criminal in the virtual town square. The messages should be simple, harsh, and keep her on her heels. It's the only thing these people respond to, oh and we should take as many of her associates with her, they helped, and they're waiting in the wings, just like Healey was when Coakley's run ended. Keep the FOIA's up, I suspect they'll lead back to DC, anyway.
Like $5000/month, approximately, on an AMEX card that is obscuring legal reporting requirements.
These seem to be a badge of honor with politicians these days. It's seems like it's a game of chicken to see how much they can get away with. You can "made to look" all you want but not enough people are paying attention.
The fact that her office refuses to release anything sounds like a tacit admission that she just pulled the decision out of her ass, tongued it a little to see if it tasted good - and then went with it.
It would be great if somebody would hack her emails and find the connection back to Clinton, Soros - or Bloomberg.
Similar threads
