We need more outrage here folks.
I wish I could say I was surprised there isn't more outrage. Sadly I'm not.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
We need more outrage here folks.
No you don't - not without our help. Neither do we without your help.I am sorry but MA residents have done this to themselves. If anyone is surprised that this could happen within the peoples republic of Mass. they have been living in a cave for 15 years.
All I can say is just stay out of our state as we still have a chance.
Niemoller said:First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me.
Not very helpful...
Thankfully, we don't live under Sharia Law...
False. There was recently a case, discussed on this forum about a guy who was charged with carrying a dangerous weapon for having a collapsable baton on his person. The case was dismissed because the law does not state that a collapsable baton is a dangerous weapon.
twas a bit tongue in cheek. I promise.
exactly how many of you who live in MA posting in this thread now would be in almost identical shoes if your wife decided she didn't like you anymore?
Something that has popped up in the latter half of this thread is that the wife had some nefarious role in some grand conspiracy here. We have ZERO evidence of this. None. Nada. Maybe it's true, but there is a very plausible alternative that's far less tin folio but still very plausible. That she told some friends something who didn't mind their own business and this chief has now run with it in a modern day witch hunt. Keep your minds open that the woman here is as much a victim of hoplophobia as her husband is.
That said, is there any word about how his dangerousness hearing went?
And there you have it... another vindictive soon-to-be ex-wife trading on her husband's good name and freedoms for her own self-gain. As a licensed psychiatrist she knows how to play the game, and is playing dirty. Poor bastard.
DAMN...
I said the wife was setting him up for a divorce and she is. The restraining order is the first step.
After all these pages, I'm still not sure what he did wrong. And if he lived 50 miles north, would this thread even exist?
I wish I could say I was surprised there isn't more outrage. Sadly I'm not.
Any man who has ever gone through a divorce in MA would have known what you meant and that it was in fact a joke! Why, because if you are a man you are guilty until proven innocent!
But when you said this you had no proof it was true. Just a hunch.
While I was not married,and it has been 2 yrs and no less than 27 moddifications to my 209A...There is hope.The other day,I went in to see if the X would try to have the order extended...The Judge concluded that her 209A had to be the most conviluted order he had ever seen,and that it would expire at the end of my probation in a few months..And that I will have no criminal record..A light at the end of the tunnel...Funny how some woman try to abuse the system.I just hope he doesn't give up
After all these pages, I'm still not sure what he did wrong. And if he lived 50 miles north, would this thread even exist?
From everything the media has reported, he did nothing wrong. If he lived 50 miles to the north we wouldn't have this thread because New Hampshire doesn't harass citizens who haven't done anything wrong.
From everything the media has reported, he did nothing wrong. If he lived 50 miles to the north we wouldn't have this thread because New Hampshire doesn't harass citizens who haven't done anything wrong.
...BTW Where is GOAL?
New story on Girard, they've now put the hearing off until tomorrow. Also, note that the story is starting to change, they are still charging him with possession of items which are not illegal to possess, and now we mysteriously have "shell casings" in the attic, ."
Ok...so the guy reloads! Or saves his empty brass from the range for the time he plans to start reloading. Shots were not heard by his neighbors and therefore shell casings in the attic do NOT prove a shot was fired in the attic
Also, his philandering wife has an LTC. Do we know SHE didn't use the range? His word against hers.
Yeah, you think thats important. But how important will it be to the jury? Think of your typical neighbor, will they think "Hey, this guy seems normal, Ill just ignore the opinions of his wife the doctor, the fact that she got a restraining order because she was afraid of him, the fact that the judge thought he was too dangerous for bail, and all the scary weapons they say he had." Or will they just think, this guy's a crackpot, thats why he's here, and his word means nothing?
Yeah, except Its his (Crazy, dangerous as per hearing, "Gun Nut") word against Hers (Doctor of some type, getting a restraining order against this crazy guy, indirectly reported him for his crazy doings) After the media blitz, and the rediculousness of the courts response to him, Who are they going to believe?
Wait, isn't this a circular argument? How can a "dangerousness hearing" use his "dangerousness" as part of the argument?