I wanted to discuss a piece of the MA AWB but did not thought it deserved a new thread. Specifically about " A receiver will be treated as the same as or interchangeable with the receiver on an Enumerated Weapon if it includes or accepts two or more operating components that are the same as or interchangeable with those of an Enumerated Weapon."
We all agree that her interpretation of the federal AWB was warped, political, and counter to any precedence that was already in place. We all disagree with her unilateral interpretation. We all agree that it was not or is not her duty to legislate. That being said, I can see how some moonbat liberal who is in her position could make the irrational, political and emotional argument and interpretation she did regarding copies and duplicates (which were never defined federally). I could see how she could purposefully neglect the semi automatic feature test to define a gun as a semi automatic by just claiming that these semi autos are copies and/duplicates of assault weapons. I could see all this because there some text written in the law regarding copies, duplicates, assault weapons, semi automatics, features etc. Of course she would have to selectively cherry pick the words in the laws to achieve her agenda. I can see how people in this state may support her because the ends justifies the means.
But in no where in the federal awb or in any piece of the MA laws have I found any reference to a receiver being treated the same as an assault weapon. This goes way beyond overreach. This piece is completely made up and fabricated in delusion. I can understand her sending a threatening letter to dealers stating that she has now interpreted an existing law in a completely new way. There is no connection to include a receiver and treat it as an enumerated weapon? To extend it further, she could put anything in place of "receiver". A keyboard will now be treated the same as an enumerated weapon.
I have my reasons for bringing this up which I will disclose in due time.
We all agree that her interpretation of the federal AWB was warped, political, and counter to any precedence that was already in place. We all disagree with her unilateral interpretation. We all agree that it was not or is not her duty to legislate. That being said, I can see how some moonbat liberal who is in her position could make the irrational, political and emotional argument and interpretation she did regarding copies and duplicates (which were never defined federally). I could see how she could purposefully neglect the semi automatic feature test to define a gun as a semi automatic by just claiming that these semi autos are copies and/duplicates of assault weapons. I could see all this because there some text written in the law regarding copies, duplicates, assault weapons, semi automatics, features etc. Of course she would have to selectively cherry pick the words in the laws to achieve her agenda. I can see how people in this state may support her because the ends justifies the means.
But in no where in the federal awb or in any piece of the MA laws have I found any reference to a receiver being treated the same as an assault weapon. This goes way beyond overreach. This piece is completely made up and fabricated in delusion. I can understand her sending a threatening letter to dealers stating that she has now interpreted an existing law in a completely new way. There is no connection to include a receiver and treat it as an enumerated weapon? To extend it further, she could put anything in place of "receiver". A keyboard will now be treated the same as an enumerated weapon.
I have my reasons for bringing this up which I will disclose in due time.