As a Justice he likely wouldn;t be able to, but man - I wish he would sue her for slander and libel when this is all said and done. It's so blatantly obvious this is politically motivated.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS June Giveaway ***Keltec SUB2000***
You and George! You guys are killing me here! I will ask Anna to squeeze you in her busy schedule, but it would have to be sometimes in the winter the earliest. She will be busy in the fall educating our liberals on different types of mushrooms. By then all liberals will graduate from the Introductory Course by PhDD.Stormy.
View: https://youtu.be/hcEeQtMxcgk
As a Justice he likely wouldn;t be able to, but man - I wish he would sue her for slander and libel when this is all said and done. It's so blatantly obvious this is politically motivated.
One can only conclude that dems like Frankenstein really, truly aren't all that smart if they thought bringing Ford into the fray was a good idea.
Well, what do you know? The internet never forgets
Abject desperation makes people do unbelievable things.
I had tooIsn't it sort of a given that every single Dem will vite no?
It's really just a popularity contest among the R's, whether he is confirmed or not.
Our two party system is a joke.
Well, what do you know? The internet never forgets and never forgives.
Supposedly from Kavenaugh's accuser's (now scrubbed) yearbook:
Actually it does quite often forget.
SCOTUS nomination of kavanaugh live
But that’s OK yours was more stylish.
:emoji_tiger:
Ooops, sorry to have offended you. I'll delete mine immediatelyActually it does quite often forget.
SCOTUS nomination of kavanaugh live
But that’s OK yours was more stylish.
:emoji_tiger:
Interesting if true. I suppose that time will tell the tale.
My bet is that she will blow off Grassley's deadline for response of tomorrow........then she will show up in person on monday and expect to pull some stunt
She doesn't show up. Call the vote.
According to an email sent by Ford's lawyers and obtained by The New York Times, she would appear as long as senators provide “terms that are fair and which ensure her safety."
“As you are aware, she has been receiving death threats, which have been reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and she and her family have been forced out of their home,” the email continues. “She wishes to testify, provided that we can agree on terms that are fair and which ensure her safety.”
If she doesn't respond by Friday at 10, there will be no hearings on Monday. The only other witness would be Kavanaugh, and they won't put him out there, there's no upside to that.According to Senator Grassley, they won't even wait for her to show up or not: she has until 10 am tomorrow to notify them if she intends to show up. If she doesn't notify them by 10 am tomorrow, hearings will start Monday. And that's how it should be. Enough with the games.
Given the amount of hush money Congress has spent to play down shit like this, I'm still shocked that DiFi threw this particular Hail Mary. The party of poundmetoo really didn't think too hard before going full retard on this topic.
Apparently, this farce is in play again as Ford's attorney says she is willing to testify but only under her conditions. Naturally, she still is not able to testify on Monday. This appears to be another lame attempt to have the confirmation vote held a week from tomorrow to ensure that Kavanaugh is not confirmed prior to Oct. 1st.
Kavanaugh accuser Christine Ford opens door to testifying next week
"She wishes to testify, provided that we can agree on terms that are fair and which ensure her safety."it's all about distracting the public and destroying a man in the process while also trying to "defeat Trump" this fall.
New Peter Strozk/Page texts came out
Trump declassified FISA warrant on Carter Page. orders all of the redaction removed
"Anonymous" accusation is made against SCOTUS nominee
BOOM! What is everyone talking about? AN unsubstantiated allegation of "sexual misconduct" 35 years ago without a date or location and no evidence or anyone who can confirm it.