If you're in a gunfight on a train with an active shooter, the liberal bitch next to you , if he lives, is going to sue you anyway
that's why you use that unarmed pussy as a meat shield.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
If you're in a gunfight on a train with an active shooter, the liberal bitch next to you , if he lives, is going to sue you anyway
If you're in a gunfight on a train with an active shooter, the liberal bitch next to you , if he lives, is going to sue you anyway
To start saying "If X happens, I'll do Y" is a good way to end up getting ****ed in the end. No encounter you have with danger to your life will EVER go as you plan/fantasize/fear. Thinking like that is how you freeze up, shoot the first dude who looks at you wrong when the shit hits the fan, or move in the wrong direction because that's the way you always envisioned it happening. What you do NEED to know before something happens is how to process what you're seeing/hearing/feeling/smelling and make decisions based on that. Pavlovian responses have no place in harms way, that's how you get dead.
Right. Completely spontaneous reaction is way better. In fact, why even bother bringing a gun? I'll just MacGyver something when the time comes.
When we had a problem they had to stop and wait for the police to show up.
Appear to have been removed,sort the comments newest first...2 comments with today's date at 7:28am & 7:29am...
http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/...te/aSTz3mB9lYC0n3xyObLd5L/story.html#comments
No question. You exit by any means necessary. Your job is to protect your family and you can't do that dead.
I ride the T 2 or 3 times a year, so I don't concern myself with that much. That being said, I'm not gonna lie, I'd be very hard pressed to make that predetermination. I'm the guy who stops at car wrecks against most people's advice, and I am generally out opening roads to friends/relatives in the event of trees or other debris blocking them.
Right. Completely spontaneous reaction is way better. In fact, why even bother bringing a gun? I'll just MacGyver something when the time comes.
Not spontaneous reaction, action driven by the circumstances at hand. There is a marked difference. This is why people who actually train with their firearms ingrain the fundamentals of gun handling to the point of autonomy, but don't spend time jerking off to repeated scenario fantasies. They spend their time giving themselves mental bookmarks; that is, playing through very broad scenarios once or twice, then moving on to another, that way you have some minor context for a large variety of scenarios that may play out. If your employment of your firearm is absolutely second nature, that's one less thing to think about when the brain bandwidth is throttled down to lizard level, and you can apply some of that minimal computing power to the tactics you need to survive.
Now you're starting to sound like this dude named bceagleace. (this is not a compliment)
You don't even know if you would attempt to exit an active shooter situation, but you're comfortable lecturing on the appropriateness of someone else having formed a decision to do so (if possible) because you think it's jerking off?
Ok then.
If your range won't allow you to draw from a holster and shoot rapid fire then join a new one FUDD.
Not to put words in his mouth but I think it comes down to training. If you regularly train under stress to gtfo, then that may be an option. However, not training at all and expecting to follow a predetermined set of actions is foolhardy.
Going to the range and hitting paper at five yards with both of your feet planted is not training, just so we are clear. That does not mean you must go operator and FTX training but basic practice should include holster draw. Replicate stress as best you can by running, hyperventilate, whatever you need to get your heart rate up.
If your range won't allow you to draw from a holster and shoot rapid fire then join a new one FUDD.
I always tell myself not to read the comments because if I do they usually aggravate me. What happens? I read the comments and get aggravated.
Yeah but keep in mind that drawing from a tacticool drop leg holster isn't useful either when on the way home you're carrying IWB with a sweatshirt over it. Train with the gear you actually have with/on you outside of the range; throw a timer in for good measure too.Not to put words in his mouth but I think it comes down to training. If you regularly train under stress to gtfo, then that may be an option. However, not training at all and expecting to follow a predetermined set of actions is foolhardy.
Going to the range and hitting paper at five yards with both of your feet planted is not training, just so we are clear. That does not mean you must go operator and FTX training but basic practice should include holster draw. Replicate stress as best you can by running, hyperventilate, whatever you need to get your heart rate up.
If your range won't allow you to draw from a holster and shoot rapid fire then join a new one FUDD.
Not spontaneous reaction, action driven by the circumstances at hand. There is a marked difference. This is why people who actually train with their firearms ingrain the fundamentals of gun handling to the point of autonomy, but don't spend time jerking off to repeated scenario fantasies. They spend their time giving themselves mental bookmarks; that is, playing through very broad scenarios once or twice, then moving on to another, that way you have some minor context for a large variety of scenarios that may play out. If your employment of your firearm is absolutely second nature, that's one less thing to think about when the brain bandwidth is throttled down to lizard level, and you can apply some of that minimal computing power to the tactics you need to survive.
Guess I didn't dumb it down enough...
Meanwhile, at the legion of doom, I'm gonna nope right outta this thread so it doesn't get derailed any further, and go double up the plates on the back of my carrier for when some dudes tryin' to smoke check me from behind with his .308.
http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/...tirs-debate/589FRHadpLI2k3RQyRUpkL/story.html
Here's an interesting follow-up from the Globe. They took a sampling of the comments and pieced them together to show both sides of the debate. I spoke with a Globe editor last night and the Globe staff seems to be amazed at the response to my letter. So am I. Perhaps people will begin to view people like us in a different way- hopefully for the better.
http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/...tirs-debate/589FRHadpLI2k3RQyRUpkL/story.html
Here's an interesting follow-up from the Globe. They took a sampling of the comments and pieced them together to show both sides of the debate. I spoke with a Globe editor last night and the Globe staff seems to be amazed at the response to my letter. So am I. Perhaps people will begin to view people like us in a different way- hopefully for the better.
http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/...tirs-debate/589FRHadpLI2k3RQyRUpkL/story.html
Here's an interesting follow-up from the Globe. They took a sampling of the comments and pieced them together to show both sides of the debate. I spoke with a Globe editor last night and the Globe staff seems to be amazed at the response to my letter. So am I. Perhaps people will begin to view people like us in a different way- hopefully for the better.
5 free articles are up...can't see the link
Use the TOR browser and after 5 articles restart the browser for another 5, repeat as necessary.
On Apple- settings - privacy- clear all- done-5 free articles are up...can't see the link
5 free articles are up...can't see the link
Some news sites managed the article limit via IP address rather than cookie.in Chrome, I usually just clear the cookies
chrome://settings/cookies