amm5061
NES Member
It was may 16. No idea how long it took.
I'm guessing about 5 minutes or less.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
It was may 16. No idea how long it took.
Linked That For Everyone But You.Docket says motion of defendant for bill of particulars denied. Trial set for July 27.
There is also the blast radius danger. I believe that's what most firearms shingle holders are most concerned about. The case is the case. But the precident SET by a case impacts far more than parties in the case.This is what I'm wondering about to. No way I'd want to tackle this without a VERY experienced 2a attorney and/or Comm2a etc.
I suspect they weren't interested and if that's true, it's probably because they don't want bad case law?
Just spitballing
OP last seen May 14.It was may 16. No idea how long it took.
would be interesting to know if they got him into custody in the courtroom over all that. sad story, as any other overly stupid story like that one.OP last seen May 14.
no he's not in custody *in that case at least* according to the docketwould be interesting to know if they got him into custody in the courtroom over all that. sad story, as any other overly stupid story like that one.
Yup!Dr. Lu, are you still a free man?
where's the video of the hearing? it's you right to record it, you are recording it aren't you?I’m still free and fighting.
I have a lot of work to do,
putting some things together.
I will be keeping you posted.
God bless the people,
Long live the Republic!
Its just a digital copy of an official court document, mildly interesting reading the states opinions.Yeah, naaaawwww... I'm not downloading that.
What’s the worst thing that could happen?There is exactly one case where representing yourself makes sense - when you want to try for a win, but would rather lose than pay the legal fees.
Pretty sure the worst that could happen is he is he becomes a convicted felon, Fed PP, and Prison.What’s the worst thing that could happen?
He’s a Doctor Who makes a fortune and will not be federally prohibited from owning a gun.
His punishment is that he should never come to Massachusetts again. I feel like that’s a win in itself..
My situation is no one ever making me leave my town, my house, my city, my state.
Sometimes you just have to say no and mean it
The worst that can happen to many professionals is loss of the professional license. Of course, in the Dr's case we have to distinguish between the two professional licenses - the LTC and the LTM (license to practice medicine).Pretty sure the worst that could happen is he is he becomes a convicted felon, Fed PP, and Prison.
I wouldn't be surprised if he lost his license to practice medicine as well, but that's minor in comparison.
He doesn't have a lawyer, representing himself according to the good DR.Late to the party and I’m no lawyer but I wish the doc the best.
Hope he’s got a real 2A lawyer and not just a dude who charges $400/hr to sit and type up 9000 word legal docs nobody in MA judicial system is going to read.
Ooh boyHe doesn't have a lawyer, representing himself according to the good DR.
I think the big question is, when the Doc loses will it just be him or will it set a precedent that will harm others as well.
Wish that link worked… Probably a good readThe worst that can happen to many professionals is loss of the professional license. Of course, in the Dr's case we have to distinguish between the two professional licenses - the LTC and the LTM (license to practice medicine).
It's interesting that the MA revocation order does not make any allegation of medical errors; patient neglect and that he shows ho record (limited report issued for last 10 years) of hospital discipline or paying/settling any malpractice suits.
The system has not been kind to his dissident behavior: (from docboard.org as of 3 minutes ago) . See details on www.docboard.org
Trial courts don't create precedent. If our hero loses and appeals, it may be prudent for a 2A advocacy group to file an Amicus brief.I think the big question is, when the Doc loses will it just be him or will it set a precedent that will harm others as well.