i dont know whats worse, him wanting a house bill number for a 10 year old LAW, or you having that bill number! haha.
I'm going with choice B.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
i dont know whats worse, him wanting a house bill number for a 10 year old LAW, or you having that bill number! haha.
Geez, guys, come on. If he wants the House bill number, give it to him: H.5636 from the 1998 session.
Who cares in a year from now everything will be outlawed and we will all be criminals, thanks to Oblowma and his rumpwad of an attorney General
But I must say, this forum confuses me, it seems that everyone is pissed off at the rules this state has, but doesn't want to do anything about it. Seems happy to just comply and keep your head down so as to not cause a ruckus or become noticed because your afraid they might take something else away.
... and will join GOAL when I see that kind of headway.
Just my two cents worth on the whole pre-ban mag thing.
From what I just read, Israeli Orlite 30 round mags are pre-ban and work well in AR-15's. There has been some confusion about the so-called "date-stamp" on the side. Orlites were never dated stamped. The number on the side is a mold number and is often confused as a date. The Israeli Army used Orlites during the 1980's into the early 1990's before switching over to the current USGI mags, so if you have any Orlite mags, you are good to go as far as being in compliance with the pre-ban mag law in Massachusetts.
Great. Another freeloader.It would be nice to see the NRA and GOAL push our lawmakers to that end.
I joined the NRA a few months back and will join GOAL when I see that kind of headway.
But I must say, this forum confuses me, it seems that everyone is pissed off at the rules this state has, but doesn't want to do anything about it. Seems happy to just comply and keep your head down so as to not cause a ruckus or become noticed because your afraid they might take something else away.
That just sucks out loud, living in fear.
Well, yes, I agree, it sucks. But breaking this law isn't necessarily the way to get the law changed. I don't want this stupid "evil mag" ban any more than anybody else, but what would landing myself in prison do to change it? It certainly wouldn't help me, and I can assure you it wouldn't cause any moral outrage in the population of this fine state.
Educating people about the laws, showing them the inherent flaws, taking gun fearful people to the range, showing that lawful gun owners don't want criminal violence and our young people killing each other any more than anybody else, and supporting organizations like GOAL. These are the things that will help make a difference.
The way I've looked at this, I don't think we can forget the chilling effect discretionary licensing brings about either. Even if one was never convicted, in many towns in this state appearing in court over even the most stupid and technical firearms violation is probably a straight ticket to giving up your rights.
Even if one were to win a "test case" the fact you were a "case" might make you "unsuitable" in someone's eyes.