If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
yah, shocker, eh?Gee, Scott is on the board. Go figure.
Thanks for the support Kieth. Where support of such illegal creation of new law should be the impetus of disbarment of those very editors, it will sadly in this state fall mainly on deaf ears.
Lol oh how I love his facespace comments.
yah, shocker, eh?
I miss Scriv, though he was banned before I became an active member I read many of his posts. Bravo for his rebuttal, but I think he would be OK with the following observations, as he called out many for their grammatical indiscretions.
The criteria determining what is an “assault weapon” was
A singular verb with a plural noun?
decade; from
Comma, not semicolon
which was
Should be "that was"
affected; gun owners
Should be a colon, not a semicolon (or better no punctuation)
Seriously, though, wonderful rebuttal and I'm glad this man is on our side.
For those of us who use Farcebook - Scrivener: https://www.facebook.com/KeithG.Langer
That's a personal problem boss, worked for me.Sorry, this page isn't available
That's a personal problem boss, worked for me.
Can someone post that letter on the Gloucester Deputy Fire Chiefs FOREHEAD please.
Can someone post that letter on the Gloucester Deputy Fire Chiefs FB please.
Having done a fair amount of legal research on the issue, I don't see how any honest lawyer can conclude she's right, though of course I look at it through my lens... but still... just no.
Mike
I don't see how any honest lawyer can conclude she's right
Mike