She has silly! They clean her house, do her laundry, cook her meals, and maintain her lawns at less than minimum wage. Of course they are hired through 3rd party contractors so she can feign ignorance...
-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
-
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Cape Gun Works & Baystate Firearms File Suit v Healey
- Thread starter Mike S
- Start date
She has silly! They clean her house, do her laundry, cook her meals, and maintain her lawns at less than minimum wage. Of course they are hired through 3rd party contractors so she can feign ignorance...
CatSnoutSoup
NES Member
There is a hearing scheduled for judgment on pleadings scheduled for this Tuesday 5/19 in this lawsuit.
Superior Court standing orders indicate business is still being conducted, and that they will use video or teleconferencing. Online access to state trial court documents is limited, unlike with federal courts, so I don't have anything to post beyond this.
Edit: Found the original petition and the current motion online.
Here's the original petition: https://news.guns.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/PetitioforDeclaratoryRelief.pdf
Here's the motion: https://www.nssf.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019.10.11MotionforJudgmentonthePleadings.pdf
As a reminder, this is the NSSF-backed action that could reverse the 7/20/16 Healey enforcement notice. The federal case on this subject had a very limited cause of action and is basically over at this point without much to show for it.
Superior Court standing orders indicate business is still being conducted, and that they will use video or teleconferencing. Online access to state trial court documents is limited, unlike with federal courts, so I don't have anything to post beyond this.
Edit: Found the original petition and the current motion online.
Here's the original petition: https://news.guns.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/PetitioforDeclaratoryRelief.pdf
Here's the motion: https://www.nssf.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019.10.11MotionforJudgmentonthePleadings.pdf
As a reminder, this is the NSSF-backed action that could reverse the 7/20/16 Healey enforcement notice. The federal case on this subject had a very limited cause of action and is basically over at this point without much to show for it.
Last edited:
Glockster30
NES Member
Appears to be rescheduled due to Covid.
| 04/22/2020 | Court orders rescheduling due to State of Emergency surrounding the Covid-19 virus.: Hearing for Judgment on Pleading scheduled on: 05/19/2020 02:00 PM Has been: Rescheduled-Covid-19 emergency Hon. Sharon Donatelle, Presiding Staff: Timothy C Walsh, Assistant Clerk Magistrate |
If this is a Healey case, my prediction is they're going to move the goalposts as to what interpretation a administration can do with "best interest" at heart with the other corona virus lawsuits and then apply that here to slap down CCGW and reaffirm the ban as legal.
![[tinfoil]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/tinfoilhatsmile.gif "Tinfoil Hat [tinfoil]")
It's showing the same status it was a few days ago, so I don't think it was postponed. It was originally postponed from 4/22 to 5/19.
The MA court website is just confusing. I don't think it's normally updated in real-time.
On 4/22 they postponed the previously scheduled 5/19 hearing to an unknown future date.
That's what they've been doing to my district court cases.
Ah. Lovely. Well, I'm sure the judges and court workers are furloughed given the fact that they're not working, right?
![[rofl]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/013.gif "ROFL [rofl]")
Honestly, who cares! The enforcement notice is crap and we all know it here. 4 years not 1 arrest! Some FFL’s are given the two middle fingers to it and some are not, oh well. We’ll see if it gets picked up by SCOTUS but I doubt it...they have been punting more than my Super Foot did Back in the day. At least we have every other bay to shoot in...lol!!!!
BREWINZ
NES Member
The only reason I care is price. The illusion of a ban is a very real market externality. When I can buy a lower from any shop in the state that price moves in our favor.
Agreed. But there will always be a ban in MA. So whether you build or buy it, will still be at a premium giving everything involved. But let’s hope we get some SCOTUS relief but I’m not holding breath.
Well, the ideal weapons protection from SCOTUS would be an "in common use" test based on "text, history, and tradition". There would be no balancing tests on text, history, and tradition - this would be a flat prohibition on weapons-based prohibitions if the weapon is in common use in the country.
This is not the most likely result if SCOTUS takes a case, but I hope they at least leave the door open to tightening it to this level in future rulings.
Great point! I hope. Once “the Notice” is completely slapped out of the ball park, in any court besides MA, I feel the Legislature goes full retard and we go from a features ban to a Canadien Ban, straight passed the liberal loving Aussie ban, lol!
Glockster30
NES Member
See post #98.
Jbarila
NES Member
Don't forget walk her dog.
Dennis in MA
NES Member
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2007
- Messages
- 38,395
- Likes
- 33,325
If you ban all of them, none are in common use.
If you ban all of them, none are in common use.
.
This is why focusing on the "Common use" point too sharply might bite you in the ass. Sure it would solve our current problem but it would mean all the government has to do to stay within that guideline is ban any new thing that is invented as soon as possible. That way it never has time to be in common use.
Similar threads
