Someone replied with this
Yeah... they have no problem whatsoever bringing u the car/gun analogy, but when you play their game, and throw the shit back at them, they cream
that "it's not the same thing"...
A 16-17 year old can obtain a DL and bring their car on school grounds (guns should be the same)
An accident or minor infraction while driving may result in a ticket and fine (guns should be the same)
Issuance or suspension of a DL is not subject to the discretion or whim of the local police chief (guns should be the same... at least for may issue states).
There is no waiting or cooling off period to purchase a car (guns should be the same)
Convicted felons, drug users, spouse abusers do not loose their privilege to purchase or drive a car (the right to own a gun should be the same)
A) Should car manufacturers, dealerships be liable/held responsible for the misuse of their products?
B) Should firearms manufacturers, dealers be liable/held responsible for the misuse of their products?
If the answer to A is no, then why shouldn't the same apply to B? (yes, fortunately manufacturers and gun dealers are protected by federal law,
but, if the gun grabbers had the opportunity... they would repeal it in a heartbeat).