YouTube to Remove Non-Political Gun Content

well I hope that youtube isn't going to pull photobucket and just shitcan all the videos without giving people enough time to save them locally at least.

This is the reason commies need to be hung on every lamp post, no negotiations, no compromises, you never know when a commie goes rabbid.

it's a f***ing public company, when did shareholders decided to commit this suicide, may be yt don't have to fear shit thanks to their backers in .gov
 
well I hope that youtube isn't going to pull photobucket and just shitcan all the videos without giving people enough time to save them locally at least.

The Youtube rep I spoke with suggested that I ensure I have copies of my videos as they would be removed and I would receive strikes for each individual occurrence.

You have 29 days and 45 minutes to back up whatever you want to back up.
 
The funny part is that YT didn't really have many "risque" vids people converting shit into bad shit that would not get Dim politician in trouble. As a f*** you, I bet more people will find another platform and just post crazy shit, because we are getting sick and tired of this nonsense.
 
The funny part is that YT didn't really have many "risque" vids people converting shit into bad shit that would not get Dim politician in trouble. As a f*** you, I bet more people will find another platform and just post crazy shit, because we are getting sick and tired of this nonsense.
The issue is there is no other platform really. After Google bought Youtube in 2006, the most popular search engine on the internet started directing people to youtube videos, the website grew and grew and nothing else was made that was a serious competitor.

Before you can even compete with youtube you have to have the servers to provide the video hosting. To go from nearly nothing in data servers to youtube levels is... impossible.

Pornhub and a very few other porno websites are really the only other websites that could do it. They have the data storage and ability to deliver it with high quality. Question is whether or not Pornhub is going to bother allowing gun channels and other channels youtube purges over time.

If I were the Pornhub president, I'd be looking at diversifying to increase revenue streams and when you have Youtube channels with half a million subs coming to you, you'd be a fool to turn them away and possibly build a more legit business out of it.
 
The issue is there is no other platform really. After Google bought Youtube in 2006, the most popular search engine on the internet started directing people to youtube videos, the website grew and grew and nothing else was made that was a serious competitor.

Before you can even compete with youtube you have to have the servers to provide the video hosting. To go from nearly nothing in data servers to youtube levels is... impossible.

Pornhub and a very few other porno websites are really the only other websites that could do it. They have the data storage and ability to deliver it with high quality. Question is whether or not Pornhub is going to bother allowing gun channels and other channels youtube purges over time.

If I were the Pornhub president, I'd be looking at diversifying to increase revenue streams and when you have Youtube channels with half a million subs coming to you, you'd be a fool to turn them away and possibly build a more legit business out of it.

The problem is that the porn industry is run by the same kind of corrupt, degenerate leftist shitheads who run everything else. They will not play ball. Plus a platform that hosts degenerate things such as cuckold, race mixing and incest themed porn is unlikely to allow bandwith to be shared with channels posting gun videos and right wing political commentary. These things do not jive.
 
Just looked at InRangeTV's profile on Pornhub, here's their stats:

Website:
InRange TV
Name:
InRangeTV
Gender:
Other
Age:
43
Last Login:
7 hours ago
Relationship Status:
Open
Interested In:
Both
Country:
United States
Turn Ons:
Digital Rights
Turn Offs:
AdSense
Profile Views:
1,895
Videos Watched:
4
Joined:
3 months ago
Lol to Adsense being a "Turn Off"

But, they joined three months ago? What were they doing on Pornhub in December? Watching the Transgirl Live Cams?
 
The problem is that the porn industry is run by the same kind of corrupt, degenerate leftist shitheads who run everything else. They will not play ball. Plus a platform that hosts degenerate things such as cuckold, race mixing and incest themed porn is unlikely to allow bandwith to be shared with channels posting gun videos and right wing political commentary. These things do not jive.
Whatever the case is the only place gun videos can go now is Pornhub. It sucks, but that's the way it is.

And what makes cuck, IR, and incest porn so degenerate? That's some of the best kind porn in the world.
 
Whatever the case is the only place gun videos can go now is Pornhub. It sucks, but that's the way it is.

And what makes cuck, IR, and incest porn so degenerate? That's some of the best kind porn in the world.

..ahh i was with you, but the end I'm not so sure..
 
Like the libs, you'll need to employ social media to alert us to trailers that need reporting. One it two complaints they ignore as noise. A couple hundred or a few thousand they'll have to take seriously.

Does shittytown have anti videos with guns in them up on youtube? Time to start reporting those, too.
 
Does this mean Demanding Mom's can claim that a gun can shoot automatic, through a concrete wall and should be banned is okay; but a video refuting this claim with that very same gun would be banned?

I have JDownloader running now on TiborasaurusRex's channel now - see how it works, and how much data their is - I do have a BluRay burner.
 
It won't hurt Google at all, but I am slowly disconnecting myself from them. I started this before they decided to shut down gun-related YouTube channels and videos. YouTube is not a government service, so Google (or Alphabet) have the right to censor whatever they want, but I don't need to actively support it.

Already moved my email and cloud storage to another provider and I have made the switch to Firefox - this was difficult but I've found the new version of Firefox (v56+) less bloated and noticeably faster than Chrome. As I said, these choices of mine won't hurt Google in the least, but it makes me feel better.
 
Just looked at InRangeTV's profile on Pornhub, here's their stats:


Lol to Adsense being a "Turn Off"

But, they joined three months ago? What were they doing on Pornhub in December? Watching the Transgirl Live Cams?

I believe there was a spate of "find another platform" late last year as Youtube started demonetizing (lol all you have to do is remove the "et", there's a joke there somewhere) gun-related content.
 
LOL they already do this. You can't even use a non-monetized clip that happens to have someone elses music playing in the background.

That was enough to piss me off and cause me to buy a vimeo account.

-Mike
Nothing new. My mannequin challenge video got pulled twice off of instagram (Not a google company, but indicative of the industry) for copyright infringement. Hell, Black Beatles (rae sremmurd song) went number one and five times platinum because of that challenge. Without it, Black Beatles might not have been been the number one rae sremmurd song.

But I guess zuck thinks that those kids would have been better off without all that free coverage and airtime, and instead been paid for every clip over 10 seconds.
 
All the purpose-built websites are missing the point. Don't get me wrong, it's great for us, but generationally this aint good. Live by private industry die by private industry I guess. Pretty disgusting. I wouldn't want them censoring gun-control propaganda either. As what has become a major media source I think the responsible thing would be to be as "open" as possible (obviously not showing human exploitation). They don't give a shit about that. Just another group of useful idiots who want to push an agenda.

Mike

There's a general arc for all these large social media platforms. When they are relatively small, they often have a hands-off approach to content. They generally only ban illegal content that would get the site shut down. Sometimes they ban porn, because they don't want the site to become a dedicated porn site which often happens. Initially the costs of running a small site are quite manageable. But as the site grows, they need to rely on an income source, which is almost always ad revenue. But ad revenue always leads to content crackdown. Big companies don't want to run their ads before controversial content. So eventually, every open forum site becomes disney land. Squeeky clean, non controversial family fun that advertisers throw money at. Twitter, facebook, youtube, etc. They all have become more content restricted as they have grown in order to protect their ad revenue.

Compare youtube to liveleak. Liveleak is basically a website for stuff not allowed on youtube. Their website is garbage though, likely due to lack of ad revenue. Most of their ads are the low grade internet spam. Toyota doesn't want to run an ad before a video of a cartel member chainsawing 3 guys heads off or before a video of a skinhead explaining why Hitler was right. They also don't want to run their ad before a video explaining how to make a zip gun from Home Depot supplies.

Youtube has been gradually exerting more control over content. This anti-gun content order does not exist in a vacuum. There's no money in running a public forum. They want to be Disneyland.

Websites that stick to their guns about being an "anything goes" forum often have trouble with funding. Places like 4chan and voat are constantly under threat of closing down shop because they can't pay the server bills. Video is much, much more expensive to host.

People on this thread are raving about this crackdown being some political coup or government censorship program, which is absurd. Social media sites are first and foremost businesses. A cabal of liberals headed by George Soros didn't pull the plug, some PR manager looking at a spreadsheet of ad revenues did.
 
Last edited:
Full 30 seems great, I just checked it after reading this post and it has way more content than a month or so ago when I first saw it.

Now all they need to do is add some funny cat videos, music and movies. Does anyone have a good "youtubish" site that has stuff that's just entertainment? I can't say that I'm done with YT, unless I can find someplace to just laugh for a while sometimes.
 
I've said before, you should try the Brave browser. It is set up by default with much stronger privacy protections than Chrome, built in ad blocking, and a mechanism to actually pay sites that you browse directly instead of making them depend on ad revenue.

If people switched to it, then a company like Facebook would be forced to stop spamming people with ads, because it would be economically feasible for a competitor to be built that did not use ads and selling of your personal information as their business model.
 
The issue is there is no other platform really. After Google bought Youtube in 2006, the most popular search engine on the internet started directing people to youtube videos, the website grew and grew and nothing else was made that was a serious competitor.


The problem is that YouTube is basically a monopoly. It's damn close to a utility. But it's not regulated like either.

Imagine if AT&T (Verizon, whatever) decided it didn't want to be associated with Planned Parenthood and canceled all their phone lines. They're a private company, right? And there are alternatives, right? (like Virgin Mobil) so what's the problem? The problem is that AT&T is a monopoly when it comes to land-line service, they're basically the only option. (yes, I know that's not actually the case, but that's relatively recent. It wasn't that long ago that there was exactly one phone provider for each location)

Youtube is the same. It's so embedded in the way we all communicate there really isn't any other viable option.

Imagine if YouTube removed all videos relating to women's health.


It's modern book burning.




If I were the Pornhub president, I'd be looking at diversifying to increase revenue streams and when you have Youtube channels with half a million subs coming to you, you'd be a fool to turn them away and possibly build a more legit business out of it.


If I were the PornHub president, I'd get another domain that wouldn't freak out people and get caught by "safety" filters, and allow any non-porn to be posted on both domains. They've got the infrastructure, they could compete with YouTube. YouTube has "are you an adult" filter, it would be pretty easy to add a "are you looking for porn" filter as a subset of "adult", and the new domain would only feed what you're looking for. (or redirect to the the PornHub domain for those videos)



Does this mean Demanding Mom's can claim that a gun can shoot automatic, through a concrete wall and should be banned is okay; but a video refuting this claim with that very same gun would be banned?

Nope, because that could easily be political speech. Unless they're just lying.
 
I wonder if this will have unintended consequences for YouTube and the anti-gun crowd:

There are a lot of complacent gun owners who haven't really had to think about politics because they have the guns they want and live in sane states.

But now all their reloading videos are gone. All the resources they thought they could count on to get reviews of new bullet designs or optics or just interesting history... all gone.

It could act as a wake-up call to them, and they might realize how important it is to become politically active, and they might donate to pro-gun candidates and pro-gun organizations.

One can hope.
 
People on this thread are raving about this crackdown being some political coup or government censorship program, which is absurd. Social media sites are first and foremost businesses. A cabal of liberals headed by George Soros didn't pull the plug, some PR manager looking at a spreadsheet of ad revenues did.

That's bullshit, pure and simple.

Google has gone through many years without a cent of profit while hosting assload of expensive servers. Where did that money come from? That's right NSA scholarship fund for promising tech. No other startup could survive. Taxpayers money flow freely to a lot of these "private" companies, same with Micro$slime. These a**h***s want to suck taxpayer tit and do what they want at the same time.

I am curious, who exactly in this publicly held company made this decision. I guarantee you it's some libtard a**h*** living in a golden mansion and preaching how no one else can have guns. I bet you it's no more than a few people who made that decision. We need to find them out, out them and shun these a**h***s like the commie pariahs that they are.
 
That's bullshit, pure and simple.

Google has gone through many years without a cent of profit while hosting assload of expensive servers.

Google keeps expanding its services, even those that are expensive to run that don't have any obvious revenue stream, to keep users within the Google world that ultimately lead to viewing ads on Google. By using Gmail, google drive, android, etc, you are more likely to stay within Google services, give valuable information to Google that is used to target ads, and later see and click on such an ad.

Where are you seeing Google running at a loss? Google is one of the most profitable companies on Earth.
 
Where are you seeing Google running at a loss? Google is one of the most profitable companies on Earth.

google wasn't founded yesterday, I remember when they just came out. For many, many years they were running a very expensive operation without ANY revenue stream. Actually their revenue stream was taxpayers. Read up on goolge early days and their relationship to .gov today. They are worse than our MBTA.
 
I bet there's lots of vendors that don't know that their instructional videos are going away.

I was just talking to Dawson Precision and they had no idea.
 
If I were the PornHub president, I'd get another domain that wouldn't freak out people and get caught by "safety" filters, and allow any non-porn to be posted on both domains. They've got the infrastructure, they could compete with YouTube. YouTube has "are you an adult" filter, it would be pretty easy to add a "are you looking for porn" filter as a subset of "adult", and the new domain would only feed what you're looking for. (or redirect to the the PornHub domain for those videos)
Do we know that he's not a moonbat? I keep trying to find company information on their website but I get distracted.
 
I bet there's lots of vendors that don't know that their instructional videos are going away.

I was just talking to Dawson Precision and they had no idea.

The amazing thing is that it's a strike-based system so it won't just be instructions going away - it'll be everything - provided you don't remove the offending material in the coming 28 days.
 
Do we know that he's not a moonbat? I keep trying to find company information on their website but I get distracted.
Yes. They've said explicitly that gun related stuff is fine.

Forgotten Weapons /InRange TV have already started cross-posting their videos there.
 
Back
Top Bottom