I am so sick of D-bags in the woods, I haven't even gone hunting one day this year. Other hunters used to respect other hunters and their space etc., not so much anymore.
The thieves probably are not hunters
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
I am so sick of D-bags in the woods, I haven't even gone hunting one day this year. Other hunters used to respect other hunters and their space etc., not so much anymore.
Since I am not a hunter this may sound like a stupid question to most.
Is it ok to go onto someones private land to hunt as long as it isn't posted as no trespassing or no hunting. If so and it is posted what are the ramifications.
Just curious.
Thanks, just seems backwards. If I owned a chunk of property I would think someone would need to ask to use it or they would be trespassing.If it's not posted, you are allowed to unless you are asked to leave. If it's posted you are trespassing and could get a summons for trespassing.
Thanks, just seems backwards. If I owned a chunk of property I would think someone would need to ask to use it or they would be trespassing.
Not in New England, personally if it's like a house lot with acreage I'll try to ask permission. If it's a remote piece of woods and I'm not bothering anyone I might hunt it. Most of the woods I hunt are corporate land or "investment" land.
Not in New England, personally if it's like a house lot with acreage I'll try to ask permission. If it's a remote piece of woods and I'm not bothering anyone I might hunt it. Most of the woods I hunt are corporate land or "investment" land.
the problem with hunters and land owners is there is always a couple of guys who ruin it for everybody. I had 120 acres up in maine i was fine with people hunting on it until a couple of ahole's started smashing thier beer bottles and leaving piles of bones in my camp. so i posted no trespassing sings with my phone# asking people to check in before hunting. I only wanted to tell them to pick up after them selves so they shot up all the signs robbed and burned my camp. i had numerous conversations with maine warden service and local police dept. not much could be done so i sold the property.
I'll be honest, being from Maine I know plenty of people with that mentality. Basically, people "from away" coming up, buying all the land, inflating the prices of land then posting it to create private little hunting preserves. People that have been hunting that open land for generations get pissed when that happens. Not saying damaging someone's property is right and I always avoid posted land even if it's stuff I've hunted for decades but it is frustrating. I had a spot I've hunted for 20 years, shot the biggest buck of my life a couple years ago there. It was sold off as one of 4 pieces of a huge chunk of woods about 3 months ago. Showed up on my first day hunting and it was all posted, 160 acres gone. Now even if the other 300 acres stays open access the deer will mostly head to that 160 acres once hunting season starts.
I understand, property rights, freedom, etc. etc. But people react emotionally when something that "was theirs" in their mind gets taken away by some "foreigner".
I'll be honest, being from Maine I know plenty of people with that mentality. Basically, people "from away" coming up, buying all the land, inflating the prices of land then posting it to create private little hunting preserves. People that have been hunting that open land for generations get pissed when that happens. Not saying damaging someone's property is right and I always avoid posted land even if it's stuff I've hunted for decades but it is frustrating. I had a spot I've hunted for 20 years, shot the biggest buck of my life a couple years ago there. It was sold off as one of 4 pieces of a huge chunk of woods about 3 months ago. Showed up on my first day hunting and it was all posted, 160 acres gone. Now even if the other 300 acres stays open access the deer will mostly head to that 160 acres once hunting season starts.
I understand, property rights, freedom, etc. etc. But people react emotionally when something that "was theirs" in their mind gets taken away by some "foreigner".
thats pretty much what i figured. I never used the land for hunting just getting away from the wife in the summer. I was fine with people using it until my dog needed stitches in their feet and i spent a week picking up glass on my vacation. burning down my camp and using the property as their personal dumping grounds for trash was my last straw.
You would be surprised of how many of those that do that damage are not "From Away". Lots of those natives resent "Flat Lander" absentee land owners.
The way you think and a way others think is not the same.
I'll be honest, being from Maine I know plenty of people with that mentality. Basically, people "from away" coming up, buying all the land, inflating the prices of land then posting it to create private little hunting preserves. People that have been hunting that open land for generations get pissed when that happens. Not saying damaging someone's property is right and I always avoid posted land even if it's stuff I've hunted for decades but it is frustrating. I had a spot I've hunted for 20 years, shot the biggest buck of my life a couple years ago there. It was sold off as one of 4 pieces of a huge chunk of woods about 3 months ago. Showed up on my first day hunting and it was all posted, 160 acres gone. Now even if the other 300 acres stays open access the deer will mostly head to that 160 acres once hunting season starts.
I understand, property rights, freedom, etc. etc. But people react emotionally when something that "was theirs" in their mind gets taken away by some "foreigner".
I don't get that attitude or why people are such pricks. It's not like they can't buy the land themselves... If they don't hold a deed then it was never "theirs". They were borrowing and it was at the good grace of others. So then they trash what others are gracious enough to let them make use of - and then get pissed when it's posted as result of their ass-hat behavior. Maybe if they were just a bit respectful.
People get complacent, they have a sense of ownership about it having used the land for so long. I don't get the being *******s and ruining the land part but I can understand the feeling of somewhat ownership after respectful use of the land for decades. Also, most pieces of land that large are way outside of what most Maine people could afford in their lifetime. That's where the resentment comes in, and yes, it comes down to life choices, if they moved to MA and became a union carpenter instead of a non-union sub in Maine they might be able to afford it. However they look at it as the people "from away" bringing all their city money, buying up all the land and not allowing the locals to use it after they have been for decades. That's bound to breed some resentment, the piece I was talking about earlier that I've been hunting for over 20 years got bought by a guy from NH. He immediately posted it all and leveled like 4 acres to build his dream vacation home and private hunting preserve. It sucks, and I was disappointed, I'm not going to damage it and maybe I'll ask if he'll let me hunt the spot once he gets settled but I was pretty annoyed when I found it.
While I believe the behavior of shitting on other peoples land is indefensible you should try to understand why someone can have a mentality that they do. It helps in generating an argument against it.
Would it be sad to lose access to a piece of land... Sure. But don't resent the property owner for it. Be thankful for the time you had and move on.
You're giving your average American too much faith. You'd be shocked at what the "Woods living Locals" do to non-resident land and cabin owners in some areas. It's pretty sickening.
Sorry - can't empathize. If some of the locals don't like the "foreigners" buying land - I wonder how much they would like it when their schools go to shit and their roads aren't repaired because they lack the tax revenue. I wonder how much they would like their tax bill when their communities have to get by minus the revenue from "foreigners". I'm sorry - but I can't empathize with that level of self entitlement. Can't have your cake and eat it too... No one is entitled to access land that they don't own, didn't pay for, don't pay taxes on while yet enjoying the benefits of that tax revenue in the form of municipal services.
Would it be sad to lose access to a piece of land... Sure. But don't resent the property owner for it. Be thankful for the time you had and move on.
...I'm not trying to sound like an ass hole here. But such people with such an attitude spend far too much time resenting others for what they have when it could be better spent on improving their own lives to acquire what they want.
I'm confused. I'm on NES right? Since when did legal property owners need to justify their decision to post their land or fear the wrath and damage of now spiteful trespassers. To me it seems that some people feel way to entitled to someone else's property [posted or otherwise].That's all I'm saying, know thy opponent, arguing theory is all well and good until some pissed off townie burns your damn camp down.
ETA: Yes, it's effectively "terrorism" if we want to use modern terms, but if the choice is between being morally superior next to your burned out rubble, or working with your neighbors to have a good relationship and keep your stuff safe. Personally, I would choose to try and find a good middle ground.
You're giving your average American too much faith. You'd be shocked at what the "Woods living Locals" do to non-resident land and cabin owners in some areas. It's pretty sickening.
I sense some stories forthcoming...? Perhaps in a thread of their own?
I'm confused. I'm on NES right? Since when did legal property owners need to justify their decision to post their land or fear the wrath and damage of now spiteful trespassers. To me it seems that some people feel way to entitled to someone else's property [posted or otherwise].
Did you even read what I wrote? What I said is go ahead and be an ******* to the locals, and in their eyes posting their age old hunting spot is being an *******. But do so at your own risk, what good does being morally superior when somebody that will _NEVER_ get caught burned all your hard work to the ground? Legally you can do whatever the **** you want to your land, however being a douche bag to the locals may have severe consequences.
I'm confused. I'm on NES right? Since when did legal property owners need to justify their decision to post their land or fear the wrath and damage of now spiteful trespassers. To me it seems that some people feel way to entitled to someone else's property [posted or otherwise].