• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Update on GOAL’s Federal Court Action on License Delays

GOAL

NES Member
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
492
Likes
938
As our members know, Gun Owners’ Action League (GOAL) has been working to address the needless delays in processing firearm license applications by many cities and towns. Citing COVID as an excuse, a number of municipalities have ceased processing all together. Others may be processing them, but at a greatly exaggerated delay.

Our first case against the City of Lowell was unsuccessful. This was mainly caused by the city processing the application from the one plaintiff. As it turns out, they issued a restricted license that is now being challenged by the license holder.

The latest federal court action has begun by going after twelve different towns. They are: Stoughton, Weymouth, Brockton, Warwick, Cambridge, Hingham, Lunenburg,

Boston, Berkley, Chelsea, Danvers, and Paxton. This list may grow as the case moves on. The lawsuit specifically alleges that each defendant (city/town) has adopted a policy, custom or practice of suspending the processing of firearms license applications during the COVID-19 State of Emergency.

GOAL had been previously working on the case with Comm2A. We are also happy to inform our members that the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) has agreed to essentially take over the case. SAF has far more experience in the federal court system than GOAL and we are happy to have them on board. The NRA has also offered to financially support the effort if needed.

We also want to add that we understand the frustration of our supporters as to how long this process takes. As we often have to remind folks that bad things happen very quickly, but it can seem an eternity to make good things happen. Thank you all for your support and your patience.

United States District Court of Massachusetts Case File Number: 1:20-cv-11933-DPW
 
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Jan 27, 2015
Messages
4,338
Likes
3,696
Location
Merrimack Valley
I'm still solidly in the park that if licenses aren't a "infringe[ment] on a right protected by the Second Amendment" (Chardin v Police) but you can't get a license because "covid", and have no other avenues to lawfully obtain said license (MSP) and therefore can't exercise that right, then indeed, licensing is an infringement as it serves to undermine and limit your ability to exercise your rights.
 

StevieP

NES Member
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Messages
8,566
Likes
4,189
Location
Gone to Carolina in my mind...
Per this thread you may want to add Wareham:

 
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Jan 27, 2015
Messages
4,338
Likes
3,696
Location
Merrimack Valley
depends how many suits Wayne bought this month
"Listen man, this lawsuit is a paid intern, two gun bunnies, and a lobbying trip to the Caribbean at least, we just can't afford that right now. This is chess not checkers, you have to see the bigger boobs picture at the national level. Sometimes you gotta let the little fish get away so some of our bigger and more elaborate swinger parties lawsuits can get traction and really change the landscape"
 
Top Bottom