-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
The Time Is Now to Recommit to a National Assault Weapon Ban | Opinion
- Thread starter mikeyp
- Start date
Whutmeworry
NES Member
You named your daughter Cricket??? Ok. Since you named your daughter Cricket I'll take you seriously...
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2020
- Messages
- 111
- Likes
- 113
This probably isn't the point I should be hung-up from on the article, but how can you say tax cuts added to the deficits when federal tax revenue increased significantly after the tax cuts?
The only good thing about this is for now, this scumbags ideas are on the far side. Even in CA they didn't actually confiscate the AR's how he suggests. If they can't pass it in CA I don't see how it would even pass a vote in a Democrat controlled congress.
BUT with that said, creepy Joe wants to make our AR's (and a bunch of other stuff) fall under NFA, that would definitely be a solid step 1 in the plan for full confiscation later.
BUT with that said, creepy Joe wants to make our AR's (and a bunch of other stuff) fall under NFA, that would definitely be a solid step 1 in the plan for full confiscation later.
One detail that bugs me (less so than the whole idea of this stuff of course) is I swear for 10 years they have been telling us we own 10 to 20 million scary guns. We frequently set new records in gun buying but the numbers never really go up.
Think about all the AR rifles & pistols, all the different calibers, all the manufacturers, AK's similarly, all the PCC's and proprietary rifle designs, all the stripped lowers, ghost guns etc etc. I continue to think anyone estimating is missing ALOT of new guns in this category.
Think about all the AR rifles & pistols, all the different calibers, all the manufacturers, AK's similarly, all the PCC's and proprietary rifle designs, all the stripped lowers, ghost guns etc etc. I continue to think anyone estimating is missing ALOT of new guns in this category.
Asaltweapon
NES Member
Now is the time to recommit to buying more guns.
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2009
- Messages
- 6,515
- Likes
- 20,927
It won't matter soon. After Trump starts his second term, Commiefornia will try to secede. When that happens, all of its congresscritters and senators will no longer be members of the US Congress. Then we'll be rid of Swallwell, Pelosi, Feinstein, and the whole bunch of traitors.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2015
- Messages
- 1,732
- Likes
- 1,206
Dumb bastard never heard of Charles Whitman, who used a standard bolt-action hunting rifle and a Sears Roebuck 12 gauge shotgun to kill his many victims. No such thing as deadly weapons; only deadly men. Whitman was very well trained and expert with firearms.
not new guy
NES Member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2009
- Messages
- 36,089
- Likes
- 54,321
pewpewpew
NES Member
I always laugh a little when I read this kind of thing. It is the height of arrogance. Look at how much difficulty we have against urban/guerilla warfare from people who are basically living in the stone age in the middle east. I'm sure it will be so much easier against a larger, better-equipped, and more coordinated group at home...
That moron came into my friend's gunshop back when he still thought he was a candidate. the owner made him look like an idiot. He had no clue what he was talking about nor knew much of the laws in place. You could see he was getting pissed. He had a camera crew with him because he thought it would be a campaign piece. It never ran but he didn't know the shop recorded it and played it often.
This is the same idiot that claimed he walked blocks for a cup of coffee rather than buy one inside the Trump tower he was standing in front of. Many pointed out that there was a Starbucks a hundred yards from that spot.
To be fair, it seems Cricket's name might be Kathryn or something.
But Swalwell is still the dad who broadcast his kid's silly childhood nickname to the whole world while citing her as an example of why he needs to piss on the Constitution. What an ass.
Poor kid already had two strikes: a pornographic last name and a first-class shit for a dad.
But Swalwell is still the dad who broadcast his kid's silly childhood nickname to the whole world while citing her as an example of why he needs to piss on the Constitution. What an ass.
Poor kid already had two strikes: a pornographic last name and a first-class shit for a dad.
From Eric Swallowswell
The Time Is Now to Recommit to a National Assault Weapon Ban
The body count will keep rising if we don't act now.www.newsweek.com
It's been more than two years since I first called for a ban and national mandatory buyback of all military-style assault weapons, and the body count has only continued to rise since then.
Americans will be safer if our communities are once and for all free from weapons of war. In the synagogues of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and Poway, California, gunmen used AR-15-style semiautomatic assault rifles; 11 died and six were injured in Pittsburgh, and one died and three were injured in Poway. A gunman toting an AK-47-style rifle with a 75-round drum killed three and injured 17 at California's Gilroy Garlic Festival. The same kind of rifle was used days later to kill 23 and injure 23 during an anti-Latino murder spree in El Paso, Texas. The very next day, a man with a modified AR-15-style weapon and a 100-round drum killed nine and injured 17 outside a nightclub in Dayton, Ohio. Later that month, an AR-15-style weapon once again was used to kill seven and injure 25 in Midland and Odessa, Texas.
In August, a teenager illegally carrying an AR-15-style rifle went 20 miles, crossing a state line to play vigilante; Kyle Rittenhouse found the trouble he was looking for, killing two people and injuring another.
These are just the assault-weapon slayings that made big headlines. There are plenty more.
We don't have to live this way—so why do we choose to? No other developed nation tolerates this carnage.
Soon after a racist maniac armed with an arsenal, including two AR-15-style rifles, killed 51 and wounded 40 in two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, their government enacted an assault weapon ban and buyback. And soon after a two-day murder spree claimed 22 lives in Nova Scotia this year, Canada banned assault weapons too.
But we couldn't make it happen here after so many children died in their schools in Sandy Hook and Parkland, after worshipers died at Sutherland Springs and Pittsburgh and Poway, or after people went out for fun and were left in body bags in Orlando and Las Vegas and Dayton.
Even the wounded are never the same. The high-velocity bullet fired from a military-style, semiautomatic assault weapon moves almost three times as fast as a 9mm handgun bullet, delivering far more energy and damage. The bullets create cavities through the victim, wrecking a wider swath of tissue, organs and blood vessels. Don't take my word for it; ask a trauma surgeon, or a coroner.
Assault weapons combine that deadliness with low recoil and higher-capacity magazines, so that more shots can be fired accurately and quickly without reloading. These weapons are designed to kill as many people as possible, as fast as possible.
They belong on battlefields, not in our communities as the murder tools of choice for hateful extremists or untrained law enforcement and military wannabes.
Reinstating the federal assault weapons ban that was in effect from 1994 to 2004 isn't enough. This would prohibit manufacture and sales, but would not affect weapons already possessed. It makes no sense to ban future production yet leave millions of these weapons in our communities; it would take generations before they'd no longer be used to kill innocent Americans.
So in May 2019, I introduced the Freedom from Assault Weapons Act. My bill builds upon assault weapon bans that have been introduced previously in Congress, defining assault weapons in the same way. But it would not "grandfather in" weapons already in circulation; instead, after a period in which the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives would develop a price, ATF would buy back the banned guns from people or businesses. All guns bought back would be destroyed.
Owners would have two years in which to sell their weapons in the buyback program; after that, the possession, sale and transfer of these banned assault weapons would become illegal and subject to criminal prosecution. The bill contains exceptions for law enforcement, and allows citizens to possess these weapons at hunting/shooting clubs.
The National Rifle Association—an organization so corrupt it was looted by its own executives—wants you to believe the government would go door to door seizing guns or arresting people. That's just their usual bull; read the bill. Possession would become a crime, the same way that drug possession is a crime—if you're caught with it outside a hunting or shooting club, you go to jail. No one is going house to house looking for assault weapons.
Australia spent an estimated $230 million in U.S. dollars when it banned and bought back 643,726 rifles and shotguns at market value after a murderer used military-style weapons to kill 35 people in April 1996.
The United States will not get off as cheaply.
Based on manufacturing figures and other indirect data, there are about 17 million assault weapons out there. If we offer $200 to buy back each weapon—as many local governments have—then it would cost about $3.4 billion; at $1,000 each, the cost would be about $17 billion.
Yet our federal government is spending an estimated $6.6 trillion this year, according to the Congressional Budget Office; $17 billion would be 0.257 percent of that, and we don't even have to spend it all in one year. Meanwhile, the Trump tax cuts, which went disproportionately to the already-rich and corporations, are projected to add $1.9 trillion to deficits over a decade.
It would take a relative pittance to keep our families, friends and neighbors safer from dying in hails of gunfire—a relatively tiny investment to avoid dreadful slaughter.
An assault weapons buyback is not the entire solution to gun violence. We need truly universal background checks for every gun purchase in America. We need to do more to take guns out of domestic abusers' hands. We need a national gun registry. We need national laws so that laws can't be evaded by a short trip across a state border. And we need real solutions to root out the underlying causes of violence: poverty, lack of access to education and economic opportunity, and a lack of hope in too many of our cities. But removing these weapons of war from our streets must be a piece of the puzzle, and doing so would undoubtedly save lives.
Spare us the pearl-clutching about constitutional freedoms. We're a joke if we don't consider the right to survive supreme over any other, and we can defend our own lives and homes perfectly well without weapons designed for mass killing.
Let's be clear: Our courts haven't discerned a constitutional right to have assault weapons. In fact, when the Supreme Court held in 2008 that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote that this right "is not unlimited" and is "not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose."
And since that District of Columbia v. Heller decision, federal appeals courts repeatedly have upheld assault weapons bans. Many other firearms are available
for self-protection, they found, and the danger that assault weapons pose to society is a legitimate reason for states and localities to ban them.
All we need is the will to do it.
I mustered the will after thinking about my dad and two brothers who have risked their lives as law enforcement officers, and about my son Nelson and daughter Cricket, who shouldn't have to grow up doing active-shooter drills in school, cowering under their desks with the lights off.
I renewed that will after watching the teenagers who lived through the Parkland massacre drop their pens and textbooks and take to the streets, joined by millions, to insist that we make a lasting change.
The body count will keep rising if we don't act. What must it take for all of us to find the will?
Rep. Eric Swalwell, a Democrat from California's San Francisco Bay area, is co-chair of the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee, and serves on the House Judiciary Committee and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Follow him on Twitter: @RepSwalwell.
Im a reading the onion or is this a parody i really am serious, list the stats of gun deaths in chicago, new york, gang neighborhoods gnenerally, at mardi gras every year 20 people get shot. but hmmmm they NEVER report those as mass shootings (which is just 3/4 people shooting each other i believe. so if we go by those rules, gangs commit thousands more "mass guns hootings," educate yourself before posting on this site libtard.
Shark_Cage
NES Member
Tell that to the IRA during the troubles.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2007
- Messages
- 2,734
- Likes
- 3,219
Confused as hell. Are we passing more laws....or putting the folks who enforce those laws out of business? I'm kinda wondering.....is compliance going to be voluntary or honor system?
"In August, a teenager illegally carrying an AR-15-style rifle went 20 miles, crossing a state line to play vigilante; Kyle Rittenhouse found the trouble he was looking for, killing two people and injuring another."
I wonder if Lin Wood is aware of this?
I wonder if Lin Wood is aware of this?
Similar threads
