• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

The Time Is Now to Recommit to a National Assault Weapon Ban | Opinion

Climbnsink

NES Member
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
7,080
Likes
6,953
Just a reminder that Democrats/Politicians will remove your rights by force using men with guns.

They will never do something as bold as a buyback. They know it won’t work and there will be non-compliance. It’s death by 1000 cuts. A generation or 2 from now it will be illegal to pass down “military style” weapons to your heirs.
There is never going to be armed gun confiscation in America. Ever. There would be enough accidental discharges by fudds handing their guns over the cops would retreat thinking they were all going to die. Seriously they will make it harder to buy new ones, and try and guilt you into giving them up. Listen to the people in England and such places they don't say their guns were taken they say they stupidly gave them up. Stories like this one are part of the pysop to scare you so you turn them in when they ask. Don't be a pussy and don't even ponder their fear porn pysop for a second.
 
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Dec 16, 2015
Messages
1,732
Likes
1,199
Location
Down the rabbit hole, somewhere in Paradise.
There is no "back" to "buyback". It is a term invented to imply the guns came from the govt and you are merely rendering unto Caesar what is his.

I did not "buyback" my car or house from anyone, and anyone buying my guns (except the vendor who sold them to me) is not "buying them back".
Sounds more like "eminent domain", where developers can petition local governments to kick people out of their homes, hand them a check for "fair value", demolish the homes and build a shopping plaza.
 

Dennis in MA

NES Member
Rating - 100%
25   0   0
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
26,644
Likes
18,535
Holy crap, it's true. I missed this at the time. The gov't has nukes, therefore you have no chance resisting, therefore you don't need an AR-15.

View: https://twitter.com/RepSwalwell/status/1063527635114852352?s=20

a day later. . . .


Ummm, you've got that backwards. If the government has nukes and we believe in 2A, we have a right to a nuke. Maybe not a ICBM. But a suitcase nuke should be legal. That's the premise of 2A. To protect the citizenry from bad guys, enemies foreign and enemies domestic. Whatever the .mil has we should have.
 

wahsben

NES Life Member
NES Member
Rating - 100%
36   0   0
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
12,121
Likes
6,155
Location
Ma.
Spare the pilots, an F-15 isn't going to react well to 7.62 rounds while on the ground. Which is where they are 98% of the time.
Even if they're pilots that won't honor their oath to uphold the Constitution and they'd follow a tyrants orders?
 

Varmint

NES Member
Rating - 100%
16   0   0
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
18,342
Likes
10,696
Location
North Shore, MA
On the ground with a rifle, facing an F15 making a strafing pass? No thanks! A 6-barrel 20mm Vulcan cannon is very formidable weapon!

Is that a tanker truck? Wonder how that responds to .50 rounds. If Mass had a clue, they'd ban these.

1602081396066.jpeg

ECePB5iUwAACCIc.jpg
 

wahsben

NES Life Member
NES Member
Rating - 100%
36   0   0
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
12,121
Likes
6,155
Location
Ma.
On the ground with a rifle, facing an F15 making a strafing pass? No thanks! A 6-barrel 20mm Vulcan cannon is very formidable weapon!
My comment was a reply to Varmint who said to spare the pilots and shoot the planes on the ground thereby disabling them. Yes shooting at them especially with a small caliber arm once they're in flight in most if not all cases won't be effective.
 

wahsben

NES Life Member
NES Member
Rating - 100%
36   0   0
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
12,121
Likes
6,155
Location
Ma.
AF drops one bomb on civilians and the gloves come off. I'll believe that when I see it - the military aren't Biden cronies.
Yes you wouldn't want to shoot them before you knew what side they're on. They may not be Biden cronies but just like some government agencies have been corrupted especially at the higher levels the military seems to have been to some extent to at those higher levels.
 

Dennis in MA

NES Member
Rating - 100%
25   0   0
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
26,644
Likes
18,535
Now is the time to recommit to buying more guns.

Before this is over, I may get to recommitting myself twice daily.

bell.jpg



Dumb bastard never heard of Charles Whitman, who used a standard bolt-action hunting rifle and a Sears Roebuck 12 gauge shotgun to kill his many victims. No such thing as deadly weapons; only deadly men. Whitman was very well trained and expert with firearms.

Great. Now you'll get ALL of us banned!
 

Climbnsink

NES Member
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
7,080
Likes
6,953
On the ground with a rifle, facing an F15 making a strafing pass? No thanks! A 6-barrel 20mm Vulcan cannon is very formidable weapon!
The pilots flying those things live among us. You never go head to head with the planes and tanks. You go to their houses. You go Dorner. Theoretically.
 

wahsben

NES Life Member
NES Member
Rating - 100%
36   0   0
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
12,121
Likes
6,155
Location
Ma.
Rating - 100%
6   0   0
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
39,577
Likes
18,887
They don't know (or will admit that they know/don't know) the diff. between "rifle", "assault rifle", and "assault weapon". They will go for ALL SEMIES. Jack.
It's like physics - you look at what is happening and try to come up with a single theory that explains it all.

The only theory that explains all the gun control pushes is they want to completely disarm those not acting on behalf of the government, and will use any excuse, any time, to take any territory they can get.
 

Horrible

NES Member
Rating - 100%
16   0   0
Joined
Mar 1, 2009
Messages
12,140
Likes
4,588
Location
NOLA
Swallows well is an a-hole. I hope that they push push this hard over the next month and lose WI, MI, PA, IA and AZ as a result. Notice how the gun control issue has not been brought up AT ALL by the LSM since the primaries ended.
 

LLF

NES Member
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Messages
484
Likes
575
Location
Martyville
Swalwell can spout his nonsense... yawn. Hot air from a dopey pol with too much time on his hands.
Folks like him like to thump the table on gun control now and then just to get some attention. Look at our own MA legislature.
As far as any confiscation scheme like that fascist bitch in New Zealand perpetrated I don't see that as likely. If the gun grabbers couldn't get anything done after Sandy Hook (December 2012 when the Senate was Democrat and the House Republican with a Democrat President) then I don't see it happening now.
 

Smokewagon

NES Member
Rating - 100%
7   0   0
Joined
Mar 19, 2012
Messages
2,731
Likes
496
Location
Central, MA
There is no "back" to "buyback". It is a term invented to imply the guns came from the govt and you are merely rendering unto Caesar what is his.

I did not "buyback" my car or house from anyone, and anyone buying my guns (except the vendor who sold them to me) is not "buying them back".

The government couldn't pass a background check anyway.
 

Koolmoose

NES Member
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
1,018
Likes
497
Location
Other side of the bridges behind the iron curtain
Prime candidate for changing her name on her 18th birthday. Anything would be an improvement over Cricket Swallowswell.

Don’t moronic parents consider their choice of names,how they match with the surname, and things like middle school?
Kids calling out “C Swalwell”!
I feel badly for the daughter.
 
Top Bottom